APPARENT BIOACCESSIBILITY OF PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS AND LYCOPENE FROM TOMATO POMACE DURING STATIC IN VITRO DIGESTION

Authors

  • Vanda Liliana BĂBĂLĂU FUSS National Institute for Research and Development for Optoelectronics INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Str., RO-400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6930-7081
  • Oana CADAR National Institute for Research and Development for Optoelectronics INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Str., RO-400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0879-9211
  • Ancuța IVAN National Institute for Research and Development for Optoelectronics INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Str., RO-400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0941-5226
  • Cristina BĂLGĂRĂDEAN National Institute for Research and Development for Optoelectronics INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Str., RO-400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6119-0108
  • Lucian CUIBUS Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372, Cluj-Napoca, Romania https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-5143
  • Anca BECZE National Institute for Research and Development for Optoelectronics INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Str., RO-400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. *Corresponding author: anca.naghiu@icia.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1418-689X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2026.2.05

Keywords:

Tomato pomace, phenolic compounds, lycopene, in vitro gastrointestinal digestion, bioaccessibility, food by-products

Abstract

Tomato pomace, a major by-product of industrial tomato processing composed mainly of peels and seeds, represents a valuable source of bioactive compounds with potential nutraceutical applications. This study comparatively evaluated the apparent bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds and lycopene from tomato pomace using two distinct in vitro gastrointestinal digestion approaches: sequential phase sampling (R1) and cumulative digestion sampling (R2). A static digestion model including oral, gastric, and intestinal phases was applied to assess the release of bioactive compounds into digestive fluids. Total phenolic content was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method and expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE), while lycopene was quantified by UHPLC-DAD. Phenolic compounds showed the highest concentration in the oral phase (332.65±29.67 mg GAE L⁻¹), followed by the intestinal phase ((234.73±21.45 mg GAE L⁻¹), with the lowest value observed in the gastric phase (171.78±14.73 mg GAE L⁻¹). Lycopene bioaccessibility increased progressively during digestion, reaching 8.61% in the oral phase, 16.47% in the gastric phase, and 29.07% in the intestinal phase. The cumulative digestion fraction was lower (22.1%), suggesting partial degradation of lycopene and retention of carotenoids within the insoluble fiber fraction of the tomato pomace matrix. These results indicate that digestion conditions and matrix interactions significantly influence the release and apparent bioaccessibility of tomato-derived bioactive compounds.

References

1. M. Knoblich; B. Anderson; D. Latshaw; J. Food Sci., 2005, 70, C495–C500

2. N. Mirabella; V. Castellani; S. Sala; J. Clean. Prod., 2014, 65, 28–41

3. A. Raiola; M. M. Rigano; R. Calafiore; L. Frusciante; A. Barone; Mediators Inflamm., 2014, 139873.

4. E. Giovannucci; Exp. Biol. Med., 2002, 227, 852–859

5. I. F. Strati; V. Oreopoulou; Int. J. Food Eng., 2011, 7, 1–16

6. E. Reboul; Nutrients, 2013, 5, 3563–3581

7. D. Tagliazucchi; E. Verzelloni; D. Bertolini; A. Conte; Food Chem., 2010, 120, 599–606

8. E. Fernández-García; I. Carvajal-Lérida; M. Jarén-Galán; J. Garrido-Fernández; A. Pérez-Gálvez; D. Hornero-Méndez; Food Res. Int., 2012, 46, 438–450

9. F. Saura-Calixto; J. Agric. Food Chem., 2011, 59, 43–49

10. C. H. M. Versantvoort; A. G. Oomen; E. Van de Kamp; C. J. M. Rompelberg; A. J. A. M. Sips; Food Chem. Toxicol., 2005, 43, 31–40

11. M. S. Brewer; Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 2011, 10, 221–247

12. M. Minekus; M. Alminger; P. Alvito; S. Ballance; T. Bohn; C. Bourlieu; F. Carrière; R. Boutrou; M. Corredig; D. Dupont; C. Dufour; L. Egger; M. Golding; S. Karakaya; B. Kirkhus; S. Le Feunteun; U. Lesmes; A. MacIerzanka; A. MacKie; et al.; Food Funct., 2014, 5, 1113–1124

13. A. Brodkorb; L. Egger; M. Alminger; P. Alvito; R. Assunção; S. Ballance; T. Bohn; C. Bourlieu-Lacanal; R. Boutrou; F. Carrière; A. Clemente; M. Corredig; D. Dupont; C. Dufour; C. Edwards; M. Golding; S. Karakaya; B. Kirkhus; S. Le Feunteun; U. Lesmes; A. Macierzanka; A. R. Mackie; C. Martins; S. Marze; D. J. McClements; O. Ménard; M. Minekus; R. Portmann; C. N. Santos; I. Souchon; R. P. Singh; G. E. Vegarud; M. S. J. Wickham; W. Weitschies; I. Recio; Nat. Protoc., 2019, 14, 991–1014

14. J. Bouayed; L. Hoffmann; T. Bohn; Food Chem., 2011, 128, 14–21

15. J. Pérez-Jiménez; F. Saura-Calixto; Food Res. Int., 2015, 74, 315–323

16. G. C. Carvalho; B. A. F. de Camargo; J. T. C. de Araújo; M. Chorilli; Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2021, 118, 447–458

17. G. Knockaert; S. K. Pulissery; I. Colle; S. Van Buggenhout; M. Hendrickx; A. V. Loey; Food Chem., 2012, 135, 1290–1297

18. D. Dupont; M. Alric; S. Blanquet-Diot; et al.; Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 2019, 59, 1546–1562

19. L. Egger; O. Ménard; C. Delgado-Andrade; et al.; Food Res. Int., 2022, 154, 110962

20. V. Athanasiadis; T. Chatzimitakos; K. Kotsou; D. Kalompatsios; E. Bozinou; S. I. Lalas; Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2023, 24, 15914

21. M. Morzel; F. Canon; S. Guyot; J. Agric. Food Chem., 2022, 70, 6317–6327

22. S. Kamiloglu; A. A. Pasli; B. Ozcelik; J. Van Camp; E. Capanoglu; Food Chem., 2015, 186, 74–82

23. F. Saura-Calixto; J. Pérez-Jiménez; Curr. Opin. Food Sci., 2021, 42, 168–175

24. C. Wang; H. Wu; Z. Liu; C. J. Barrow; F. Dunshea; H. A. R. Suleria; Food Funct., 2022, 13, 4954-4966

25. L. Egger; O. Ménard; C. Delgado-Andrade; P. Alvito; R. Assunção; et al.; Food Res. Int., 2016, 88, 217–225

26. J. M. Carbonell-Capella; M. Buniowska; F. J. Barba; M. J. Esteve; A. Frígola; Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 2014, 13, 155–171

27. S. Kamiloglu; A. A. Pasli; B. Ozcelik; et al.; LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 2015, 64, 1305–1312

28. J. Pérez-Jiménez; F. Saura-Calixto; Food Res. Int., 2015, 74, 315–323

29. A. Sridhar; M. Ponnuchamy; P. S. Kumar; A. Kapoor; D. N. Vo; S. Prabhakar; Environ. Chem. Lett., 2021, 19, 3409–3443

30. J. Bouayed; L. Hoffmann; T. Bohn; Food Chem., 2011, 128, 14–21

31. C. Le Bourvellec; C. M. G. C. Renard; Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 2012, 52, 213–248

32. L. Jakobek; M. Matošić; Foods, 2019, 8, 633

33. M. Pellegrini; R. Lucas-Gonzalez; E. Sayas-Barberá; et al.; Food Res. Int., 2021, 147, 110546

34. I. Fernández-Jalao; C. Sánchez-Moreno; B. De Ancos; Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 2022, 62, 4892–4908

35. M. Elleuch; D. Bedigian; O. Roiseux; et al.; Food Chem., 2011, 124, 411–421

36. F. Saura-Calixto; J. Agric. Food Chem., 2011, 59, 43–49

37. E. Reboul; P. Borel; Prog. Lipid Res., 2011, 50, 388–402

38. E. Fernández-García; I. Carvajal-Lérida; M. Jaren-Galan; et al.; Food Res. Int., 2012, 46, 438–450

39. P. Borel; C. Desmarchelier; U. Dumont; et al.; Br. J. Nutr., 2016, 115, 1701–1711

40. J. Corte-Real; E. Richling; L. Hoffmann; Food Funct., 2016, 7, 3235–3244

41. M. J. Brown; M. G. Ferruzzi; M. L. Nguyen; et al.; Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 2004, 80, 396–403

42. A. J. Roodenburg; R. Leenen; H. van Berg; et al.; Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 2000, 71, 1187–1193

43. W. W. Fish; P. Perkins-Veazie; J. K. Collins; J. Food Compos. Anal., 2002, 15, 309-317

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

BĂBĂLĂU FUSS, V. L., CADAR, O., IVAN, A., BĂLGĂRĂDEAN, C., CUIBUS, L., & BECZE, A. (2026). APPARENT BIOACCESSIBILITY OF PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS AND LYCOPENE FROM TOMATO POMACE DURING STATIC IN VITRO DIGESTION. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia, 71(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2026.2.05

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.