Réflexions sur l’espace comique. L’exemple du « Mariage de Figaro »

Authors

  • Patrick DANDREY Sorbonne Université, Paris IV. Patrick.Dandrey@sorbonne-universite.fr.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbdrama.2020.2.01

Keywords:

Beaumarchais, The Marriage of Figaro, comic space, dramatic techniques, armchair, tragedy, spatial beings, social beings.

Abstract

Reflections on Comic Space. The Example of The Marriage of Figaro. This study shows from the example of the Marriage of Figaro how the space defined by the dramatic text within fiction has a creative energy and a range of meaning which can be compared to that of the speech or the acting of the characters. Suzanne’s armchair is the centre of a long play of scenes in the 1st act: this inert object then constitutes the crux of the action and embodies the force of chance fighting against the Figaro industry, a bit like fate in the tragedy fights against the active will of the heroes. The corner of the park under the chestnut trees in the last act plays the same role by precipitating all the intrigue and all the characters, in favour of the night, in a game of masks, misunderstandings and deceptions which summarize the issues of the intrigue and untie it. Figaro’s monologue located at the entrance to this dramatic space gives the key to its functioning: human life is governed by Chance, which is the god of comedy. Consequently, the question of Being becomes that of being there. This awareness by Figaro opens at the heart of comic space a subjectivation by spatialization, the secret of which is that we are spatial beings, that is to say social beings, defined in everything and for everything by our relationships and by the successive situations in which we form, act and live: lucid and disillusioned awareness of our constitutive “spatiality”.

Author Biography

Patrick DANDREY, Sorbonne Université, Paris IV. Patrick.Dandrey@sorbonne-universite.fr.

Patrick Dandrey is Professor Emeritus of 17th century French literature at the Faculty of Letters of the Sorbonne. Member of the Royal Society of Canada (Academy of Arts, Letters and Human Sciences), corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences, Inscriptions and Belles-Lettres of Toulouse, he chairs the Society of Friends of Jean de La Fontaine. Specialist in 17th century French literature and culture, in particular Molière and La Fontaine, and in the ancient medicine of the soul, in particular the imaginary of melancholy, he has devoted some twenty books to them, as many of critical editions and editorial works, and just under two hundred studies and articles. Teaching guest of several foreign universities (Moscow and Saint-Petersburg, Columbia/New York and Chicago, Lausanne and Basel, Cluj-Napoca), he directs the scientific journal Le Fablier, pilots or has piloted several editorial collections (Éditions Honoré Champion, Hermann and Klincksieck) and intervenes periodically in cultural media (magazines, radio and television).

References

Barbéris, Pierre. « Un Hamlet comique : Figaro dans son monologue. » Analyses et réflexions sur Le Mariage de Figaro. Paris : Ellipses, 1985.

Billaz, André. « Voltaire traducteur de Shakespeare et de la Bible : philosophie implicite d’une pratique traductrice. » Revue d’Histoire littéraire de la France, no 3 (1997) : 372-380.

Beaumarchais. Théâtre. Éd. Jean-Pierre de Beaumarchais. Paris : Classiques Garnier, 1980.

Beaumarchais. Œuvres. Éd. Pierre et Jacqueline Larthomas. Paris : Gallimard, 1988.

Beaumarchais, Jean Pierre de. « Le Mariage de Figaro : une conquête de l’espace. » Le Siècle de Voltaire. Hommage à René Pomeau. Oxford : Voltaire Foundation, 1987, 83-88.

Dagen, Jean. « Figaro et le théâtre à effet. » Revue d’Histoire Littéraire de la France, no 4 (2000) : 1159-1169.

Dandrey, Patrick. « La comédie, espace “trivial”. À propos des Contens d’Odet de Turnèbe. » Revue d’Histoire du Théâtre, no 4 (1984) : 323-340.

Ehrard, Jean. « La société du Mariage de Figaro. » Mélanges Jean Fabre, Approches des Lumières. Paris : Klincksieck, 1974, 169-180.

Larthomas, Pierre. «La toise de Figaro ou Beaumarchais metteur en scène.» D’Eschyle à Genet : hommage à Francis Pruner. Dijon : Éditions universitaires, 1986, 219-224.

Michaud, Guy. « L’intrigue et les ressorts du comique dans Le Mariage de Figaro. » Mélanges d’esthétique et de science de l’art offerts à Étienne Souriau. Paris : Nizet, 1952, 189-203.

Nablow, Ralph A. « Beaumarchais, Figaro’s monologue and Voltaire’s Pauvre Diable. » Romance Notes, Winter (1987) : 109-114.

Pomeau, René. Beaumarchais ou la bizarre destinée. Paris : PUF, 1987.

Scherer, Jacques. La Dramaturgie de Beaumarchais. Paris : Nizet, 1954.

Turnèbe, Odet de. Les Contens. Comédie nouvelle en prose française. Texte établi, présenté et annoté par Charles Mazouer. Paris : Honoré Champion, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-30

How to Cite

DANDREY, P. (2020). Réflexions sur l’espace comique. L’exemple du « Mariage de Figaro ». Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Dramatica, 65(2), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbdrama.2020.2.01

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.