In Vitro – In Vivo Correlation of Pentoxifylline: A Comprehensive Kinetic Analysis

Authors

  • Maria CODREANU Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca; Department of Regulatory Affairs, Antibiotice SA, Iaşi, Romania.
  • Diana IACOB Antibiotice SA, Center for Drug Evaluation, Iaşi, Romania.
  • Maria Ioana ONOFREI Sf. Parascheva Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Clinic of Infectious Diseases; "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Infectious Diseases, Iaşi, Romania.
  • Ana-Maria VLASE Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: gheldiu.ana@umfcluj.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-0777
  • Dana Maria MUNTEAN Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, ‟Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: dana.muntean@umfcluj.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0200-1280
  • Laurian VLASE Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics. Email: laurian.vlase@umfcluj.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0664-3387

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2024.4.13

Keywords:

In Vitro – In Vivo Correlations (IVIVCs), pentoxifylline, in vitro dissolution, bioequivalence, Level A Correlation

Abstract

This study presents an analysis of In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC) for pentoxifylline modified-release tablets, with a focus on deriving robust predictive models. In vitro dissolution tests were conducted in three pH media (1.2, 4.5, and 6.8) to simulate various gastrointestinal conditions. Data was collected under fed conditions from a bioequivalence (BE) study. The modeling and calculations were performed using Phoenix WinNonlin® version 8.4 software, enabling estimation of drug absorption kinetics. A Level A IVIVC model was employed for each in vivo data to establish a direct and reliable correlation between the in vitro dissolution profiles and the in vivo pharmacokinetic data. The determination coefficient (R²) exceeded 0.97, demonstrating a high degree of predictability and robustness in the established IVIVC.

References

1. N. Alimpertis; A. Simitopoulos; A.A. Tsekouras; P. Macheras; Pharm. Res., 2024, 41, 235–246.

2. M.G. Davanço; D.R. Campos; P.D.O. Carvalho; Int J Pharm, 2020, 580,119210.

3. P.K. Tuszyński; J. Szlęk; S. Polak; R. Jachowicz; A Mendyk; Dissolution. Technol., 2018, 20-24.

4. S. Jacob; A.B. Nair; Drug Development Research, 2018, 79, 97–110.

5. Y. Qiu; J.Z. Duan; Pharmaceutical Theory and Practice, 2nd ed.; Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2017, chapter 16.

6. A. Fortuna; J. Bioequiv. Availab., 2011, S3,1-12.

7. P. Kaur, X. Jiang, J. Duan, E. Stier.; AAPS J, 2015,17,1035–1039.

8. S. Suarez-Sharp, M. Li, J. Duan, H. Shah, P. Seo; AAPS J, 2016,18,1379–1390.

9. I. González-García, V. Mangas-Sanjuán, M. Merino-Sanjuán, M. Bermejo; Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 2015, 1-13.

10. J.M. Cardot, J.C. Lukas, P. Muniz; AAPS J, 2018, 20, 95.

11. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry. Waiver of In Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System, 2017 [cited 2024 Oct. 12]. Available at: https://digirepo.nlm.nih.gov/master/borndig/101720038/UCM070246.pdf

12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Draft Guidance, The Use of Physio¬logically Based Pharmacokinetic Analyses Biopharmaceutics Applications for Oral Drug Product Development, Manufacturing Changes, and Controls Guidance for Industry [cited 2024 Oct. 12]. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/142500/download

13. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), Guideline on quality of oral modified-release products, 2014 [cited 2024 Oct. 12]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-quality-oral-modified-release-products_en.pdf

14. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), Guideline on the pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation of modified-release dosage forms, 2014 [cited 2024 Oct. 12]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-pharmacokinetic-and-clinical-evaluation-modified-release-dosage-forms_en.pdf

15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry. Extended-Release Oral Dosage Forms: Development, Evaluation, and Application of In Vitro/In Vivo Correlations, 1997 [cited 2024 Oct. 12]. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/70939/download

16. Health Canada. Guidance Document: Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Guidance: New Drug Submissions (NDSs) and Abbreviated New Drug Submissions (ANDSs). 2017 [cited 2024 Oct. 12]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/applications-submissions/guidance-documents/chemical-entity-products-quality/guidance-document-quality-chemistry-manufacturing-guidance-new-drug-submissions-ndss-abbreviated-new-drug-submissions.html

17. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry: SUPAC-MR: Modified-release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Scale-Up and Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls; In Vitro Dissolution Testing and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation. 1997 [cited 2024 Oct. 12]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/supac-mr-modified-release-solid-oral-dosage-forms-scale-and-postapproval-changes-chemistry

18. N.F. Taha, L.H. Emara; AAPS Pharm.Sci.Tech., 2024, 25, 243.

19. A.R. Pawar, N.A. Shete, P.V. Jadhav, V.K. Deshmukh, J.S. Mehetre; Pharmaceut. Fronts, 2021,3, e200-e207.

20. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare, European Pharmacopoeia, Pentoxifylline monograph 0851, Ph. Eur. 11th ed., 2020.

21. M.F. McCarty, J.H. O’Keefe, J.J. DiNicolantonio; Open Heart, 2016, 3, e000365.

22. A.M. Shailendrakumar, V.M. Ghate, M. Kinra, S.A. Lewis; AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech.,2020, 21,118.

23. D.I. Pop, A. Marcovici, M. Oroian, A.M. Gheldiu, L. Vlase; Studia UBB Chemia, 2019, 64, 217-229.

24. Certara. IVIVC Toolkit™ User’s Guide Applies to: IVIVC Toolkit 8.3 for Phoenix WinNonlin® Phoenix WinNonlin 8.3 reference manual user. 2020 [cited 2024 Oct. 12]. Available from: https://onlinehelp.certara.com/phoenix/8.3/responsive_html5_!MasterPage!/IVIVC%20Toolkit%20User%27s%20Guide.pdf

25. J. Fallinborg; Dan Med Bull, 1999, 46(3), 183-196.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

CODREANU, M., IACOB, D., ONOFREI, M. I., VLASE, A.-M., MUNTEAN, D. M., & VLASE, L. (2024). In Vitro – In Vivo Correlation of Pentoxifylline: A Comprehensive Kinetic Analysis. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia, 69(4), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2024.4.13

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.