EFFECT OF FLUID VISCOSITY ON FLUIDIZATION HYDRODYNAMICS AN EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Nassima KECHROUD Department of Process Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Abderrahmane Mira University, Bejaia, Algeria. *Corresponding author: nassima.kechroud@univ-bejaia.dz https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9611-9206
  • Hamid TIGHZERT Department of Process Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Abderrahmane Mira University, Bejaia, Algeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2026.1.07

Keywords:

Fluidization, Newtonian fluid, hydrodynamic, effect of viscosity, expansion, minimum fluidization velocity, terminal settling velocity

Abstract

In this study, we conducted an experimental investigation of the fluidization behavior of spherical glass particles with diameters dp=2 mm and dp=4 mm, using Newtonian fluids (aqueous sugar solutions). The influence of fluid viscosity on key global hydrodynamic characteristics of fluidization was examined, including the minimum fluidization velocity, the terminal settling velocity of the particles, and bed expansion. Experiments were carried out in a cylindrical glass column with an inner diameter of D=20 mm and a height of H=1500 mm.

The minimum fluidization velocity and bed expansion were determined experimentally for different solid–liquid systems. The experimental results were compared with various correlations from the literature. It was found that the results are in good agreement with some of these correlations, particularly for bed porosity values below 0.6.

References

1. S. Ergun; Chemical Engineering Progress, 1952, 48, 89–94.

2. C. Y. Wen; Y. H. Yu; Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, 1966, 62, 100–111.

3. J. Balag; D. A. T. Franco; V. G. Miral; V. Reyes; L. J. Tongco; E. C. R. Lopez; Engineering Proceedings, 2023, 56, 62.

4. A. H. Darweesh; M. M. Weis; Advanced Mechanical and Materials Engineering, 2024, 41, 39–46.

5. Ł. Lasek; A. Zylka; J. Krzywański; D. Skrobek; K. Sztekler; W. Nowak; Energies, 2023, 16, 7311.

6. J. F. Richardson; W. N. Zaki; Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1954, 32, 35–53.

7. R. Coltters; A. L. Rivas; Powder Technology, 2004, 147, 34–48.

8. M. J. A. de Munck; E. A. J. F. Peters; J. A. M. Kuipers; Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, 62, 16687–16701.

9. H. Miura; T. Takahashi; J. Ichikawa; Y. Kawase; Powder Technology, 2001, 117, 239–246.

10. A. Kaur; A. Sobti; R. K. Wanchoo; Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, 62, 18704–18719.

11. J. P. Riba; R. Routié; J. P. Couderc; Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1978, 56, 26–30.

12. A. M. Lali; A. S. Khare; J. B. Joshi; K. D. P. Nigam; Powder Technology, 1989, 57, 39–50.

13. D. J. Zigrang; N. D. Sylvester; AIChE Journal, 1981, 27, 1043–1044.

14. E. Barnea; J. Mizrahi; Chemical Engineering Journal, 1973, 5, 171–189.

15. E. Barnea; R. L. Mednick; Chemical Engineering Journal, 1978, 15, 215–227.

16. L. D. Boset; Z. A. Debele; A. W. Koroso; Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer Research, 2025, in press.

17. J. Garside; M. R. Al-Dibouni; Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 1977, 16, 206–214.

18. S. P. Neill; M. R. Hashemi; Fundamentals of Ocean Renewable Energy, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25

How to Cite

KECHROUD, N., & TIGHZERT, H. (2026). EFFECT OF FLUID VISCOSITY ON FLUIDIZATION HYDRODYNAMICS AN EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE STUDY. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia, 71(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2026.1.07

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.