Sinnbilder in der Sintflutgeschichte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/sacrascripta.2023.02Keywords:
Biblical prehistory, the flood, Noah, natural catastrophe, symbols, interpretation of symbolsAbstract
The author of the history of flood would like to answer the old question of humanity about the connection between the natural catastrophe and God`s will. He tries to give an answer by means of a narrative or by the help of symbols, respectively. The task of the interpreter consists in clarifying the truth that generated the symbols. Our starting point in our analysis is that one cannot study the story isolated from the whole biblical text. By visualizing the narrative the author intends to express the theological thinking that the natural catastrophe cannot be looked upon as a fateful happening, but as upon God`s instrument to express his own creative will in Salvation History.
References
ARNETH, M., Art. “Sintflut”: RGG 4. Bd. VII, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2004, 1345.
BAUMGART, N.C., Art. “Sintflut”: Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche IX, Herder 2006, 626–627.
CALVIN, J., Genesis. Translated by John KING M. A., The Banner of Truth Trust, Edinburgh, Reprinted 1992, 257–258.
CLEMENS, von Rom. Apostoli Atyák. Szerk. VANYÓ László, Szent István Társulat, Budapest 1988.
COLLINS, C. John, “Noah, Deucalion, and the New Testament.” In: Biblica (Commentarii Periodici Pontificii Instituti Biblici. Vol. 93. Fasc. 3.) 2012, 403–426.
DIDYME, L'AVEUGLE, Sur la Genèse II, Sources Chrétiennes, Paris: Ed. Du Cerf. 1978.
EBACH, Jürgen, Art. “Naturerfahrung”: Sozialgeschichtliches Wörterbuch zur Bibel, Frank CRÜSEMANN, Kristian HUNGAR, Claudia JANSSEN et alii (Hrsg.), Gütersloher Verlagshaus 2009.
FIEDROWICZ, M., Theologie der Kirchenväter. Grundlagen frühchristlicher Glaubensreflexion, Freiburg – Basel – Wien.
FISCHER, G., Genesis 1–11, Freiburg – Basel – Wien: Herder 2018.
GERÉB, Zs., A Kolosséiakhoz és a Filemonhoz írt levél magyarázata, Kolozsvár 2010.
GERÉB, Zs., Péter első levelének magyarázata, Kolozsvár 2015.
GIES, Kathrin, Art. “Noah”: http.www.bibelwissenschaft.de./ Stichwort 29356, Aug. 2012.
GUNKEL, H., Genesis 1–11, 1922.
KELLER, C. A., Art. “Sintflut”: RGG 3. Bd. VI, Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 50–52.1957–61.
LENKEYNÉ SEMSEY, Klára, Péter második levelének és Júdás levelének magyarázata, Budapest: Kálvin Kiadó 2012.
MIRCEA, Ioan A., Epistola Întîi a Sfîntului Apostol Petru. Introducere și comentariu. Teza de doctorat, București 1973.
ORIGÈNE, Homélies sur la Genèse, Sources Chrétiennes, Paris: Ed. Cerf 1976.
PARROT, A., Déluge et Arche de Noé, Cahiers d’archéologie biblique, 1955.
PETIT LAROUSSE, Des Symboles, Paris 2006.
RAD, G. von, Das erste Buch Mose Kap. 1–12,9, ATD, Göttingen 1955.
SELMS, van A., Genesis deel I. De Prediking van het Oude Testament, Nijkerk: Callenbach 1967.
SIMIAN-YOFRE, Horacio, Art. “Nam (Reue)”: Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Alten Testament. Bd. V, Stuttgart – Berlin – Köln: Kohlhammer 1986, 366.
TERTULLIEN, De idol., 24.
TILLICH, P., Rendszeres Teológia, Budapest: Osiris 1996.
TÓTH, Kálmán, Mózes első könyve. Jubileumi Kommentár, Budapest 1982.
WALLIS, G., Art. “Sintflut”: Biblisch-Historisches Handwörterbuch. Bd. 3, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1966, 1801–1803.
WESTERMANN, C., Genesis I/I. Biblischer Kommentar AT I/1, Neukirchen-Vluyn 1976.
ZIMMERLI, W., 1. Mose 1–11: Die Urgeschichte, Zürich: Theologischer Verlag 1967.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Sacra Scripta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
