AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY STORAGE USING THE RESTORE CONCEPT: ANALYSIS OF THE GMUNDEN CEMENT PLANT

Authors

  • Alessandra-Diana SELEJAN-CIUBANCAN Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Letitia PETRESCU Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: letitia.petrescu@ubbcluj.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-0561
  • Stefan Cristian GALUSNYAK Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0585-7623
  • Calin-Cristian CORMOS Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-1167

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2025.3.16

Keywords:

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Thermochemical Energy Storage (TCES), Heat Pump (HP), Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), District Heating and Cooling (DHC)

Abstract

The RESTORE initiative explores an innovative method of energy storage based on the thermochemical cycling of copper sulphate. During periods of surplus renewable electricity, such as for example solar-rich summer months, the system stores energy through the dehydration of copper sulphate. The stored energy is subsequently recovered during colder periods, such as winter, when energy demand increases and renewable availability declines, via the rehydration of the material. The current investigation focuses on the industrial RESTORE application at the Gmunden cement plant in Austria, proposing the integration of Thermochemical Energy Storage (TCES) with an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and a Heat Pump (HP). The sustainability of the system was evaluated through a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), conducted in accordance with the standard LCA framework, using version 10.8 of the LCA for Experts software. Environmental performance was quantified based on eleven key indicators derived from the ReCiPe 2016 assessment method. The functional unit for this study was set as the generation of 1 kWh of thermal energy, enabling a consistent comparison between the two construction alternatives of storage tanks, relevant to the industrial use case: carbon steel against high-density polyethylene (HDPE). The system boundaries were established to encompass the complete life cycle, segmented into three primary stages: i) Upstream activities; ii) Core operational processes; iii) Downstream operations. The use of HDPE outperformed carbon steel in key impact categories, cutting global warming potential (GWP) by over 55%, while significantly lowering other indicators. However, increased impacts in terms of fossil depletion and freshwater ecotoxicity potential are registered, likely due to the petroleum-based nature of HDPE. Several discussions and interpretations of the most relevant environmental key performance indicators are provided, underlining the effectiveness of the proposed concepts.

References

1. E. C. Okonkwo; A. AlNouss; M. Shahbaz; T. Al-Ansari, Energy Convers. Manage., 2023, 296, 117687.

2. Causes of climate change - European Commission. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/climate-change/causes-climate-change_en (accessed June 23, 2025).

3. Global and European temperatures 2025. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/global-and-european-temperatures (accessed June 23, 2025).

4. Q. Bian, Environ. Syst. Res., 2020, 9, 8.

5. Y. Hao; I. Khan, Energy, 2025, 324, 135863.

6. K. I. Vatalis; G. Avlogiaris; T. A. Tsalis, J. Environ. Manage., 2022, 309, 114713.

7. P. Kalita; D. Kashyap; U. Bordoloi, Thermal Energy Storage Systems for Cooling and Heating Applications. In Energy Storage; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: 2021; pp 149–199.

8. M. Eyidogan; F. Canka Kilic; D. Kaya; V. Coban; S. Cagman, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2016, 58, 885–895.

9. Luis, H2020 RESTORE Project. https://www.restore-dhc.eu/about-us/h2020-restore-project/ (accessed June 23, 2025).

10. O. Jolliet; S. Shaked; A. Jolliet; P. Crettaz; M. Saadé, Environmental Life Cycle Assessment; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2016.

11. H.-J. Klüppel, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 2005, 10, 165–165.

12. S. C. Galusnyak; L. Petrescu; D. A. Chisalita; C.-C. Cormos, Energy, 2022, 259, 124784.

13. E. Perz; S. Kysela; M. Perz, 2025, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15341167.

14. L. Schmieder; S. Kuloglija; K. Ilyina-Brunner; S. Jezernik; F. Winter, Appl. Therm. Eng., 2025, 258, 124557.

15. M. A. J. Huijbregts; Z. J. N. Steinmann; P. M. F. Elshout; G. Stam; F. Verones; M. Vieira; et al., Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 2017, 22, 138–147.

16. SimTech GmbH, IPSE GO — The Future of Process Simulation. IPSE GO 2022. https://about.ipsego.app/ (accessed August 11, 2025).

17. IPSE GO — Mass and Energy Balance Process Simulation Online. https://ipsego.app (accessed August 11, 2025).

18. M. Botejara-Antúnez; J. González-Domínguez; F. J. Rebollo-Castillo; J. García-Sanz-Calcedo, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 2025, 74, 104188.

19. S. Katz; A. S. Lindner, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 2003, 53, 469–477.

20. LCA for Experts (GaBi) Software; Sphera™: 2024.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-24

How to Cite

SELEJAN-CIUBANCAN, A.-D., PETRESCU, L., GALUSNYAK, S. C., & CORMOS, C.-C. (2025). AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY STORAGE USING THE RESTORE CONCEPT: ANALYSIS OF THE GMUNDEN CEMENT PLANT. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia, 70(3), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2025.3.16

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.