COMPARATIVE IN VITRO STUDY OF THE DIFFERENT ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS USING TWO ETCHING TECHNIQUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2017.4.17Keywords:
SEM, etching technique, in vitro, adhesionAbstract
Direct bonding of the bracket to the enamel is the elective procedure for the orthodontic treatment. Among various factors influencing the adhesive force at the enamel level, the etching technique seems to be the most important one. The present study aims at evaluating the influence of the storage media and the etching technique used, on the bond strength between different bracket types and dental structures. The results of this study showed that, regardless of the brackets and the immesion solution used, by working with the classic etch and rinse technique, the adhesion force is higher than by using a self-etching adhesive.
References
M. Hashimoto, H. Ohno, E. Yoshida, M. Hori, H. Sano, M. Kaga, H. Oguchi, European Journal of Oral Science, 2003,111, 447.
C. Raposo, I.L. Santana, Revista Odontologia Ciencia,2012, 27,143.
B.C. Parrish, T.R. Katona, S.C. Isikbay, K.T. Stewart, K.S. Kula, Angle Orthodontics, 2012, 82, 131.
M. Schroeder, A.C.S. Gama, A.G.V. Moares, L.C. Yamasaki, A.D. Loguercio, J. Bauer, Dental Materials, 2011, 27, 20.
P.S. Fleming, Evidence Based Dentistry, 2014, 15, 48.
A. Elkhadem, N. Orabi, Evidence Based Dentistry, 2013, 14, 52.
A. Schnebel, S. Mateer, A.L. Maganzini, K. Freeman, Journal of Orthodontics, 2012, 39, 256.
T. Lamper, N. Ilie, K. C. Huth, I. Rudzki, A. Wichelhaus, E. Paschos, Clinical Oral Investigations, 2014, 18, 313.
S.E. Elsaka, S. M. Hammad, N. F. Ibrahim, Progress in Orthodontics, 2014, 16, 33.
V. Bolaños-Carmona, B. Zein, M. Menéndez-Núñez, P. Sánchez-Sánchez, L. Ceballos-García, S. González-López, Dental Materials Journal, 2015, 34, 449.
J.A. von Fraunhofer, M. M. Rogers, General Dentistry, 2004, 52, 308.
C. Speera, D. Zimnyb, W. Hopfenmuellerc, E. Holtgrave, Angle Orthodontist, 2005, 75, 5.
J.F. Tahmassebi, M.S.Duggal, G. Malik-Kotru, M.E. Curzon, Journal of Dentistry, 2006, 34, 2.
H.H. Yip, R.W. Wong, U. Hägg, World Journal of Orthodontics, 2009, 10, 33.
J.M. Steffen, Angle Orthodontist, 1996, 66, 449.
A. Valiollah, N. Fatemeh, R. Mehdi, K. Ahmad, Mohammad S. Barati. Electron physician, 2017, 9, 3584.
F. Öztürk, M. Ersöz, S.A. Öztürk, E. Hatunoğlu, S. Malkoç. European Journal of Orthodontics, 2016, 38, 163.
K. Zarrinnia, N.M. Eid, M.J. Kehoe, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, 1995, 108, 284.
M. Fjeld, B. Øgaard, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, 2006, 130, 575.
E. İşman, E.S. Karaarslan, R. Okşayan, A.R. Tunçdemır, S. Üşümez, N. Adanir, M.A. Cebe, Dental Materials Journal, 2012, 31, 947.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
