COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SPRAY-DRYING AND FREEZE-DRYING ON THE SOLUBLE COFFEE PROPERTIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2017.4.26

Keywords:

soluble coffee, spray-drying, freeze-drying, physical properties, microstructure, antioxidant activity

Abstract

The paper presents a comparative study of some physical properties, microstructure and antioxidant capacity of soluble coffee obtained at laboratory scale using spray-drying (SD) and freeze-drying (FD) as dehydration techniques. SEM was used for monitoring structures and size of the coffee powder. The results of SEM show the difference in the microstructure with the used drying technique. SD dried coffee has only spherical shape, narrow distribution, with the particle mean size of about 10 mm and smooth surface. The FD dried coffee has spherical shape with the size of about 40 mm and flaky structure, non-spherical shape, with the dimensions between 10 x 20 mm and 30 x 90 mm. EPR was used for the determination of coffee antioxidant capacity. SD coffee powder shows a higher antioxidant activity in comparison with FD dried coffee.

References

GEA Process Technology for Instant Coffee, Available on http://www.gea.com/global/en/binaries/GEA_Process

P. Patel, M. P. Patel, A. M. Suthar, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2009, 2(10), 44.

G.R. Nireesha, L. Divya, C. Sowmya, N. Venkateshan, M. Niranjan Babu, V. Lavakuma, International Journal of Novel Trends in Pharmaceutical Science, 2013, 3(4), 87.

C. Ratti, Handbook of food powders: processes and properties, 2013, 57.

S. Khalloufi, J.L., Robert, C. Ratti, Journal of Food Processing Engineering, 2005, 28(2), 107.

G.A. Reineccius, Drying Technology, 2004, 22(6), 1289.

W. Suwelack, D. Kunke, Process for freeze drying coffee extract, 2002, US 6,428,833 B1.

M.C. Nicoli, M. Anese, L. Manzocco, C.R. Lerici, Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technology, 1997, 30, 292.

H. Steinhart, A. Luger, J. Piost, “Antioxidative Effect of Coffee Melanoidins. In Proceedings of the 19th International Scientific Collogue on Coffee”, Trieste, Italy, 14–18 March, 2001.

A. Farah, C.M. Donangelo, Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2006, 18, 23.

M.D. Del Castillo, J.M. Ames, M.H. Gordon, Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 2002, 50, 3698.

E. Nebesny, G. Budryn, European Food Research and Technology, 2003, 217, 157.

S. Padma Ishwarya, C. Anandharamakrishnan, Journal of Food Engineering, 2015, 149, 171.

A. Ghirişan (Miclăuş), S. Drăgan, V. Miclăuş, STUDIA Universitatis “Babeş-Bolyai”, Chemia, 2017, 62(1), 7.

G. Kaptay, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2012, 430, 253.

O.A. Caparino, J. Tang, C.I. Nindo, S.S. Sablani, J.R. Powers, J.K. Fellman, Journal of Food Engineering, 2012, 111, 135.

M.K. Krokida, Z.B. Maroulis, G.D. Saravakos, International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2001, 36, 53.

M. Richelle, I. Tavazzi, E. Offord, Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry, 2001, 49, 3438.

E. Nebesny, G. Budryn, European Food. Research and Technology, 2003, 217, 157.

J.A. Vignoli, D.G. Bassoli, M.T. Benassi, Food Chemistry, 2011, 124, 863.

A. Wilkowska, W. Ambroziak, A. Czyzovska, J. Adamiec, Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 2016, 66(1), 11.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-29

How to Cite

GHIRIŞAN (MICLĂUȘ), A. ., & MICLĂUŞ, V. . (2017). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SPRAY-DRYING AND FREEZE-DRYING ON THE SOLUBLE COFFEE PROPERTIES. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia, 62(4, Tome II), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2017.4.26

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.