INVESTIGATION, SIMULATION AND COMPARISON OF VARIOUS ROUTES FOR BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION

Authors

  • Letitia PETRESCU Department of Chemical Engineering, Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: letitiapetrescu@chem.ubbcluj.ro. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-0561
  • Ana-Maria POSA Department of Chemical Engineering, Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: letitiapetrescu@chem.ubbcluj.ro.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2020.3.09

Keywords:

Bioethanol production, process modelling and simulation, technical comparison

Abstract

Bioethanol has proven its value as an alternative fuel to gasoline, in fact, more as an adding than a competitor. Bioethanol has attracted a lot of interest due to its biodegradable nature, low cost, low toxicity and safety. The present work is focused on process modelling and simulation of bioethanol production using biomass and / or CO2 and H2 as raw-materials. The first scenario investigated considers the biomass fermentation, the second scenario considers the thermo-catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 while the combination of the previously methods was assumed in the third scenario. The main advantages of these routes are the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the production of one valuable chemical, bioethanol. A productivity of 30,000 tones/year of bioethanol is set for all three cases. Purities, higher than 90% for the main product, are obtained. The technical comparison of the three scenarios leads to the conclusion that the best option to obtain bioethanol is from cellulosic biomass. In this first case, the energy consumption is 0.08 kW / kg bioethanol and the carbon dioxide emissions are 0.96 kg CO2 / kg bioethanol being much lower than in the other two considered cases.

References

G. Whitten. Air Quality and Ethanol in Gasoline, Smog Reyes, December, 2004.

M. Arshadi, H. Grundberg H. Biochemical production of bioethanol. Handbook of Biofuels Production, 2011, 199 – 220.

Renewable Fuels Association, http://www.ethanolrfa.org (Accessed in June 2020).

Natural Resources Defense Council, Unlocking the Promise of Ethanol, February 2006.

M. Balat, H. Balat, C. Öz. Progr. Energ. Combust. Sci., 2008, 551 – 73.

H.J. Arpe, K. Weissermel K. Industrial Organic Chemistry, 2010, Vol.8, 393, 7. https://epure.org (Accessed in February 2020).

U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Biomass Program, Feedstock Types, 2012.

P.C. Badger. Ethanol from cellulose: A general review, 2002, 17 – 21.

V.S. Sikarwara, M. Zhaoa, P.S. Fennelld, N. Shahd, J.A. Edward. Progr. Energ. Combust. Sci., 2017, 189 – 248.

S. Clarke, F, Preto, Biomass densification for energy production, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food factsheet, 2011 (Accessed March 2020).

S. Brethauer, M. H. Studer. Int. J. Chem., 2015, 572 – 581.

C.E. Wyman C.E. Handbook on bioethanol. Production and utilization. Washington, DC, 1996.

D. Pimentel, T.W. Patzek T.W. Nat. Resour. Res., 2005, 65 – 70.

M. Arshadi, H. Grundberg. Processes and Technologies. Biochemical production of bioethanol, Handbook of Biofuels Production, 2011.

http://www.bioethanol.prosim.net/E10_BioethanolPlant.pdf (Accessed in March 2020).

K. Atsonios, K.D. Panopoulos, E. Kakaras. Int. J. Hydrog. Energ., 2016, 792 – 80.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

PETRESCU, L. ., & POSA, A.-M. . (2020). INVESTIGATION, SIMULATION AND COMPARISON OF VARIOUS ROUTES FOR BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia, 65(3), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2020.3.09

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.