BEYOND THE SALINITY GRADIENT ENERGY HARVESTING

Authors

  • Cristiana-Nicoleta FUICU Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnologies and Environmental Protection, University Politehnica Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1783-8416
  • Nicolae VASZILCSIN Technical Sciences Academy of Romania, Bd. Dacia 26, 010414 Bucuresti, Romania; Research Institute for Renewable Energies, University Politehnica Timisoara, Piata Victoriei 2, 300006 Timisoara, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2600-8572
  • Mircea-Laurențiu DAN Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnologies and Environmental Protection, University Politehnica Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7798-5974
  • Delia-Andrada DUCA Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnologies and Environmental Protection, University Politehnica Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania. *Corresponding author: delia.duca@upt.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7279-4784

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2026.2.10

Keywords:

diffusion potential, Henderson relationship, membrane potential, reverse electrodialysis, pressure retarded osmosis, blue energy, capacitive mixing method

Abstract

Recently, salinity gradient energy – known as blue energy – has sparked the interest of researchers in identifying a new source of renewable energy, available at the contact between river water and seawater. In this paper, which is a mini-review of the salinity gradient energy harvesting, the appreciable potential of this energy source is emphasized by calculating the thermodynamic effect of mixing a water of high salinity, which simulates seawater, with water of low salinity, characteristic of rivers. Unfortunately, this potential of salinity gradient energy is difficult to exploit due to technical limitations. In such circumstances, the seawater-river water system was approached as an electrochemical thermodynamic system, at the interface of which an electric potential difference occurs. In the simplest case, this is a diffusion potential, evaluated based on Henderson equation. The value of the diffusion potential is low (about 20 mV) because the interface between these two media is crossed by both cations and anions. If, however, the two media of different salinity are separated by an ion exchange membrane, there is a much larger potential difference between them (about 100 mV), called membrane potential, which can be capitalized using a concentration cell. Moreover, the main methods applied so far for the recovery of the salinity gradient energy are highlighted: pressure retarded osmosis, reverse electrodialysis and capacitive mixing methods.

References

1. N. Yilmaz; K. Looby; A. Atmanli; Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 150, 150133.

2. F. P. Pinheiro; D. M. Gomes; F. L. Tofoli; R. F. Sampaio; L. S. Melo; R. C. F. Gregory; D. Sgro; R. P. S. Leao; Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 97, 690–707.

3. M. Akhtaruzzaman; A. K. Banerjee; S. Boubaker; Energy Econ., 2025, 145, 108185.

4. B. Su; W. Dong; T. Jiang; Z. W. Kundzewicz; Innov., 2025, 8, 100888.

5. D. Jina; Y. Jinb; Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2023, 198, 69–80.

6. X. Y. Yuan; W. B. Zhang; A. Batol; X. Y. Liu; N. S. Zhou; J. Zhou; J. Feng; J. H. Liu; X. J. Ma; Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 519, 165103.

7. Z. Jia; B. Wang; S. Song; Y. Fan; Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2014, 31, 91–100.

8. D. Suárez-Alfonso; A. Ruiz-García; M. Khayet; Renew. Energy, 2026, 256, 124344.

9. P. Wang; Y. Liu; Y. Li; T. Tang; Q. Ren; Energy, 2024, 313, 133729.

10. K. Touati; G. Nouri; C. N. Mulligan; J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2025, 13,118490.

11. J. W. Post; C. H. Goeting; J. Valk; S. Goinga; J. Veerman; H. V. M. Hamelers; P. J. F. M. Hack; Desalin. Water Treat., 2010, 16, 182–193.

12. R. A. Tufa; S. Pawlowski; J. Veerman; K. Bouzek; E. Fontananova; G. di Profio; S. Velizarov; J. G. Crespo; K. Nijmeijer; E. Curcio; Appl. Energy, 2018, 225, 290–331.

13. R. E. Pattle; Nature, 1954, 174, 660.

14. K. Watanabe; Y. Akiba; H. Ishidaira; H. Shima; Desalination, 2025, 605, 118706.

15. N. Bonciocat; Electrochimie şi aplicaţii, Editura Dacia Europa Nova, Timişoara, România, 1996, pp. 87.

16. K. J. Vetter; Electrochemical Kinetics: Theoretical Aspects, Academic Press, New York, 1967, pp. 48.

17. O. A. Petrii; G. A. Tsirlina; Electrode potentials. In Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry, 1st ed.; E. Gileadi, M. Urbakh Eds.; Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2002; Volume 1, pp. 9.

18. L. Oniciu; E. Constantinescu; Electrochimie şi coroziune, Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucureşti, România, 1982.

19. D. Dobos; Electrochemical Data, Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, Olanda, 1975.

20. Y. D. Raka; R. Bock; H. Karoliussen; Ø. Wilhelmsen; O. S. Burheim; Membranes, 2021, 11, 135.

21. https://www.britannica.com/science/seawater

22. C. Gui; B. Liao; X. Zhang; Y. Wang; G. Ding; H. Huang; T. Ren; P. Liu; X. Hu; L. Huang; Chem. Eng. Sci., 2026, 320, 122605.

23. R. W. Baker; Membrane Technology and Applications, McGraw Hill, New York, USA, 2000.

24. G. Wilczek-Vera; J. H. Vera; Fluid Phase Equilib., 2005, 236, 96–110.

25. P. Ocon; M. D. Reboiras; Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg., 1987, 17, 489-501.

26. R. Stepak; Anal. Chim. Acta, 1987, 203, 79-83.

27. G. Scatchard; W. H. Orttung; J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1966, 22, 12-18.

28. S. B. B. Solberg; M. Hammer; Ø. Wilhelmsen; S. Burheim; Fluid Phase Equilib., 2024, 586, 114173.

29. G. Tan; S. Lu; J. Fan; G. Li; X. Zhu; Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 322, 134724.

30. M. Essalhi; A. H. Avci; F. Lipnizki; N. Tavajohi; Renew. Energy, 2023, 215, 118984.

31. K. Touati; G. Nouri; C. N. Mulligan; J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2025, 13, 118490.

32. X. Zhou; W. – B. Zhang; J. – J. Li; X. Bao; X. – W. Han; M. M. Theint; X. – J. Ma; Energy Convers. Manag., 2022, 255, 115315.

33. S. Loeb; F. Van Hessen; D. Shahaf; J. Membr. Sci., 1976, 1, 249-269.

34. J. Pan; W. Xu; Y. Zhang; Y. Ke; J. Dong; W. Li; L. Wang; B. Wang; B. Meng; Q. Zhou; F. Xia; Nano Energy, 2024, 132, 110412.

35. S. Lin; Z. Wang; L. Wang; M. Elimelech; Joule, 2024, 8, 334–343.

36. M. Sharma; P. P. Das; A. Chakraborty; M. K. Purkait; Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 2022, 49, 101687.

37. J. T. Arena; K. K. Reimund; J. R. McCutcheon; Desalination, 2021, 498, 114804.

38. M. Malankowska; Z. Su; K. Karlsen; M. F. Buhl; H. Guo; L. S. Pedersen; M. Pinelo; Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 297, 120221.

39. D. Suárez-Alfonso; A. Ruiz-García; M. Khayet; Renew. Energy, 2026, 256, 124344.

40. M. Sharma; P. P. Das; A. Chakraborty; M. K. Purkait; Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 2022, 49, 101687.

41. A. Altaee; A. Cipolina; Renew. Energy, 2019, 141, 139-147.

42. P. Długołecki; K. Nymeijer; S. Metz; M. Wessling; J. Membr. Sci., 2008, 319, 214–222.

43. Z. Y. Guo; W. Z. Cui; Z. Y. Ji; K. Tumba; J. Wang; L. J. Fu; Z. X. Zhang; J. Liu; Y. Y. Zhao; Z. D. Zhang; J. S. Yuan; Desalination, 2023, 566, 116900.

44. J. Veerman; M. Saakes; S. J. Metz; G. J. Harmsen; J. Membr. Sci., 2009, 327, 136–144.

45. R. A. Tufa; S. Pawlowski; J. Veerman; K. Bouzek; E. Fontananova; G. di Profio; S. Velizarov; J. G. Crespo; K. Nijmeijer; E. Curcio; Appl. Energy, 2018, 225, 290–331.

46. J. Janga; Y. Kanga; J. H. Hanb; K. Janga; C. M. Kima; I. S. Kima, Desalination, 2020, 491, 114540.

47. Z. Wang; L. Wang; M. Elimelech; Engineering, 2022, 9, 51–60.

48. A. Siria; P. Poncharal; A. L. Biance; R. Fulcrand; X. Blasé; S. T. Purcell; L. Bocquet; Nature, 2013, 494, 455–458.

49. J. Wang; C. S. Law; K. N. Vu; S. Gunenthiran; K. Nielsch; A. D. Abell; A. Santos; Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 515, 163453.

50. L. Wang; Z. Wang; S. K. Patel; S. Lin; M. Elimelech; ACS Nano, 2021, 15, 4093–4107.

51. M. Macha; S. Marion; V. V. R. Nandigana; A. Radenovic; Nat. Rev. Mater., 2019, 4, 588.

52. M. Tsutsui; K. Yokota; I. W. Leong; Y. He; T. Kawai; Cell Rep. Phys. Sci., 2022, 3, 101065.

53. K. Yazda; K. Bleau; Y. Zhang; X. Capaldi; T. St-Denis; P. Grutter; W. W. Reisner; Nano Lett., 2021, 21, 4152–4159.

54. D. Brogioli; R. Ziano; R. A. Rica; D. Salerno; F. Mantegazza; J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2013, 407, 457–466.

55. G. R. Iglesias ; S. Ahualli ; M. M. Fernandez ; M. L. Jimenez ; A. V. Delgado J. Power Sources, 2016, 318, 283–290.

56. M. Marino; L. Misuri; M. L. Jiménez; S. Ahualli; O. Kozynchenko; S. Tennison; M. Bryjak; D. Brogioli; J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2014, 436,146–153.

57. B. E. Conway, Electrochemical Supercapacitors, Kluver Academic, New York, 1999.

58. B. B. Sales; M. Saakes; J. W. Post; C. J. N. Buisman; P. M. Biesheuvel; H. V. M. Hamelers; Environ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 44, 5661–5665.

59. D. Lee; J. Choi; U. Paik; T. Song; Y. G. Jung; S. Yang; Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 525, 170452.

60. Z. Zou; L. Liu; S. Meng; X. Bian; Energy Rep., 2022, 8, 7325–7335.

61. K. Smolinska-Kempisty; A. Siekierka; M. Bryjak; Desalination, 2020, 482,114384.

62. H. Choi; D. Kim; D. G. Kim; Y. Kim; J. G. Park; M. G. Kim; Y. G. Jung; J. Yoo; J. Baek; S. Kang; B. Kim; J. H. Bang; D. Lee; B. G. Kim; S. Yang; Desalination, 2024, 581, 117591.

63. H. Zhu; W. Xu; G. Tan; E. Whiddon; Y. Wang; C. G. Arges; X. Zhu; Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 294, 240-248.

64. S. Sarp; Z. Li; J. Saththasivama; Desalination, 2016, 389, 2-14.

65. https://www.power-technology.com/projects/statkraft-osmotic/ (accesat 15.05.2026)

66. https://www.renewableinstitute.org/japans-first-osmotic-power-plant-what-it-means-for-clean-energy/ (accesat 15.05.2026)

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

FUICU, C.-N., VASZILCSIN, N., DAN, M.-L., & DUCA, D.-A. (2026). BEYOND THE SALINITY GRADIENT ENERGY HARVESTING. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia, 71(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2026.2.10

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.