Developing Environmental Awareness and Stewardship by Multimodal Exploration of the Natural World with the Means of Digital Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.2025.2.05Keywords:
environmental awareness, environmental stewardship, multimodal exploration, digital technologies, environmental educationAbstract
Current and acute environmental problems highlight the need to develop educational approaches that can foster both environmental awareness and stewardship. Although environmental education has advanced in recent years and is increasingly supported by policy and legislation, literature continues to point to a gap in terms of transferring knowledge into practice. Considering this gap, the purpose of this article is to propose a conceptual model for developing environmental awareness and stewardship in lower secondary education through the multimodal exploration of the natural world supported by digital technologies. The model, constructed through a systematic synthesis of literature, is based on raising environmental awareness and stewardship through the development of scientific, environmental, and digital competences, along with strengthening the connection with the environment through multimodal and digital exploration. To illustrate the model’s applicability, the article presents an example of a practical activity combining multisensory field exploration with digital tools for documenting, identifying, and interpreting environmental phenomena. This example shows how multimodal experiences, supported by technology and structured classroom reflection, can create meaningful contexts for developing competences relevant to environmental responsibility. The article argues that such competence-based, experiential, and digitally enriched approaches offer promising directions for strengthening environmental awareness and stewardship in everyday-school practice.
References
Akrofi, M. M., Antwi, S. H., & Gumbo, J. R. (2019). Students in climate action: A study of some influential factors and implications of knowledge gaps in Africa. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6020012
Auer, M. R. (2008). Sensory perception, rationalism and outdoor environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 17(1), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.2167/irgee225.0
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
Barbaro, N., & Pickett, S. M. (2016). Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.026
Barreda, A. B. (2018). Assessing the level of awareness on climate change and sustainable development among students of Partido State University, Camarines Sur, Philippines. The Journal of Sustainability Education.
Beames, S., Higgins, P., & Nicol, R. (2012). Learning outside the classroom: Theory and guidelines for practice. Routledge.
Beery, T. H. (2013). Nordic in nature: Friluftsliv and environmental connectedness. Environmental Education Research, 19(1), 94–117.* https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.688799
Beery, T., & Jørgensen, K. A. (2018). Children in nature: sensory engagement and the experience of biodiversity. Environmental Education Research, 24(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1250149
Bennett, N. J., Whitty, T. S., Finkbeiner, E., Pittman, J., Bassett, H., Gelcich, S., & Allison, E. H. (2018). Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management, 61(4), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., & Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2022). GreenComp: The European sustainability competence framework (JRC128040). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/13286
Boncu, Ș., Candel, O. S., & Popa, N. L. (2022). Gameful green: a systematic review on the use of serious computer games and gamified mobile apps to foster pro-environmental information, attitudes and behaviors. Sustainability, 14(16), 10400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610400
Brügger, A., Kaiser, F. G., & Roczen, N. (2011). Connectedness to nature, inclusion of nature, environmental identity, and implicit association with nature. European Psychologist, 16(4), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000032
Capaldi, C. A., Passmore, H.-A., Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Dopko, R. L. (2015). Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i4.449
Corral-Verdugo, V. (2002). A structural model of proenvironmental competency. Environment & Behavior, 34, 531–549.
Council of the European Union. (2018). Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (2018/C 189/01). Official Journal of the European Union, C 189, 1–13.
Doychinova, K. (2024). A competency-bazed approach in the environmental education of the students-future biology teachers. Acta Scientifica Naturalis, 11(1).
Enqvist, J. P., West, S., Masterson, V. A., Haider, L. J., Svedin, U., & Tengö, M. (2018). Stewardship as a boundary object for sustainability research: Linking care, knowledge and agency. Landscape and Urban Planning, 179, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.07.005
European Commission. (2019). The European Digital Competence Framework for Citizens (DigComp 2.1): Understanding and developing digital competence. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
European Commission. (2023). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive) (COM(2023) 166 final). https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/green-claims-directive_en
Fadel, C., & Lemke, C. (2008). Multimodal learning through media: What the research says (pp. 1–24). San Jose, CA: Cisco Systems.
Foss, A. W., & Ko, Y. (2019). Barriers and opportunities for climate change education: The case of Dallas–Fort Worth in Texas. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(3), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1604479
Freije, A. M., Hussain, T., & Salman, E. A. (2017). Global warming awareness among the University of Bahrain science students. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Sciences, 22, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaubas.2016.02.002
Frick, J., Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1597–1613.
Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
Grasel, C. (2001). Ökologische Kompetenz: Analyse und Förderung [Ecological competence: Analysis and promotion] (Unpublished habilitation thesis). Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Greenwood, D., & Hougham, R. J. (2015). Mitigation and adaptation: Critical perspectives toward digital technologies in place-conscious environmental education. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210314566732
Hajj-Hassan, M., Chaker, R., & Cederqvist, A. M. (2024). Environmental education: A systematic review on the use of digital tools for fostering sustainability awareness. Sustainability, 16(9), 3733. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093733
Hazel Mae, L. C. (2024). Carbon Footprint and Climate Change Awareness Implications for Climate Change Education in a Junior High School. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 8(3), 1077-1095.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
Jensen, B. B. (2002). Knowledge, action and pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145474
Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2003). Ecological behavior’s dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 598–613.
Kenyeres, M., Albulescu, I., & Pop-Păcurar, I. (2022). Exploring the development of procedural knowledge and related competencies through study of Biology in middle and high schools in Romania. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Psychologia-Paedagogia, 67(2).
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Kuo, M., Barnes, M., & Jordan, C. (2019). Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00305
Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin books.
Luo, H. (2023). Advances in multimodal learning: pedagogies, technologies, and analytics. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1286092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1286092
Markowitz, D. M., Laha, R., Perone, B. P., Pea, R. D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2018). Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 421569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02364
Martin, L., White, M. P., Hunt, A., Richardson, M., Pahl, S., & Burt, J. (2020). Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of environmental psychology, 68, 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389
Marucci, M., Di Flumeri, G., Borghini, G., Sciaraffa, N., Scandola, M., Pavone, E. F., Babiloni, F., & Aricò, P. (2021). The impact of multisensory integration and perceptual load in virtual reality settings on performance, workload, and presence. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 4831. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84196-8
McNeal, K. S., Petcovic, H. L., & Reeves, P. M. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of climate change in the United States: Science, policy, and the need for climate education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 593–603.
Ministry of National Education. (2017). Biology syllabus for lower secondary education (Grades 5–8). Bucharest: Ministry of National Education.
NASA. (2022). The effects of climate change. NASA Science. https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/effects/
National Centers for Environmental Information. (2025). Monthly Climate Reports: Global – January/February 2024 (Report no. 202413). Retrieved November 8, 2025, from https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202413
Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Global environmental change, 47, 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009
Parliament of Romania. (2023). National Education Law No. 198/2023. Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, No. 618.
Pensini, P., Otto, S., & Kaiser, F. G. (2016). Nature experiences and adults' self-reported pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01055
Roczen, N., Kaiser, F. G., Bogner, F. X., & Wilson, M. (2014). A competence model for environmental education. Environment and Behavior, 46(8), 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513492416
Romaniuk, R., Antonova, O., Sorochynska, O., Tsurul, O., & Sidorovich, M. (2021). The essence and mechanisms of environmental competence formation in students of natural science departments. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 280, p. 09004). EDP Sciences.
Șăitan, T., Olteanu, S., Afrim, C., Tanur, I., Miricel, F., Manea, C., Neagu, A., Divoiu, M., & Mihai, A. (2017). Training guide for biology teachers: Tenure, definitive (Ghid de pregătire pentru profesorii de biologie. Titularizare, Definitivat). Didactica Publishing House.
Schlosberg, D., Collins, L. B., & Niemeyer, S. (2019). Adaptation policy and community discourse: Risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. Environmental Politics, 28(5), 835–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1513837
Somerville, M., & Green, M. (2012). Place and Sustainability Literacy in Schools and Teacher Education. Australian Association for Research in Education (NJ1).
Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., & Bradshaw, A. (2016). How climate change beliefs among US teachers do and do not translate to students. PloS one, 11(9), e0161462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161462
Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Bondell, H. D., Mertig, A. G., & Moore, S. E. (2013). Environmental, institutional, and demographic predictors of environmental literacy among middle school children. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59519. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059519
UNESCO. (1976). The Belgrade Charter: A global framework for environmental education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000017772
UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
UNESCO-UNEP. (1978). The Tbilisi Declaration: Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000032763
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Whitburn, J., Linklater, W. L., & Milfont, T. L. (2019). Exposure to urban nature and tree planting are related to pro-environmental behavior via connection to nature, the use of nature for psychological restoration, and environmental attitudes. Environment and behavior, 51(7), 787-810. 10.1177/0013916517751009
Worrell, R., & Appleby, M. C. (2000). Stewardship of natural resources: Definition, ethical and practical aspects. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009534214698.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Psychologia-Paedagogia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
