The Meaning of Kant’s Attitude Towards the Technical Instruments of Science in the Atmosphere of Enlightenment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2024.3.01Keywords:
Kant, technical instruments of science, technic/technology, technophilia and technophobia, moral lawAbstract
I mention the main, technophile and technophobe, positions towards technology in the Western 18th century, as the criterion of this paper. Then I show that, however unexpected would this be, the concept of technics – opening the problem of technics – was explicitly present within the transcendental philosophy. From its multiple meanings outlined in the logic of this philosophy, I focus on the technical instruments of science. Kant considered them optimistically, but insisted that they are only means subordinated to the capability of reason that alone is able to give knowledge. And the vault key of knowledge is the moral law (the moral telos) given by the human reason. Thus, answering to Rousseau, Kant indicates that the progress of knowledge is ultimately determined by this moral, and not by the enrichment of cognisance as a result of technical instruments. If we consider them as a model for the treatment of the technical objects in the broad sense of this term, Kant introduced the criticism of the technophile reductionism, while creating the frame of the positivist science and the humanistic philosophy of the 19th century.
References
The English translations of Kant have corresponding volume and pagination in the Academy Edition (Akademie Textausgabe, AA), all online
MSI De Mundi Sensibilis atque Intelligibilis Forma et Principiis / Kant’s Inaugural Dissertation
NTH Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels / Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens
FM/Lose Blätter Bemerkungen zu den Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen/Remarks on the observations on the feeling of the beautiful and the sublime
KrV Kritik der reinen Vernunft / Critique of Pure Reason
WA Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung? / An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment
GMS Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten / Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
KpV Kritik der praktischen Vernunft / Critique of Practical Reason
KU Kritik der Urteilskraft / Critique of Judgment
ZeF Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf / Toward Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch
Anth Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht / Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View
OP Opus Postumum
Aigner, Franziska (2020). Kant and technics: From the Critique of Pure Reason to the Opus Postumum. Kingston University London, Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy (CRMEP), Kingston University, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy, June, from https://www.academia.edu/98700872/Kant_and_technics_from_the_Critique_of_Pure_Reason_to_theOpus_Postumum.
Bazac, Ana (2010). The Machine Motif in Descartes. Noesis, XXXV, 71-87.
Carnino, Guillaume et Liliane Hilaire-Pérez (2017). Qu’est-ce que la technologie? Jalons pour l’histoire longue d’un concept oublié. In (sous la dir.), Guillaume Carnino, Liliane Hilaire-Pérez, Jochen Hoock, La Technologie générale : Johann Beckmann, Entwurf der algemeinen Technologie / Projet de technologie générale (1806). Presses universitaires de Rennes, 13-36, from https://books.openedition.org/pur/154362.
de Tocqueville, Alexis (1866). L'Ancien Régime et la Révolution. In Œuvres complètes, volume 4, Éditions Lévy, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k39207q.
de Vries, Jan (1976). The Economy of Europe in an Age of Crisis, 1600–1750. Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, Michael (2024). Leibniz and the Stocking Frame: Computation, Weaving and Knitting in the 17th Century, Journal for Artificial Intelligence. Volume 34. Minds and Machines (Suppl 1), 11–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-023-09623-3.
Garner, Guillaume (2017). Johann Beckmann et les sciences camérales du XVIIIe siècle. In (sous la dir.), Guillaume Carnino, Liliane Hilaire-Pérez, Jochen Hoock, La Technologie générale : Johann Beckmann, Entwurf der algemeinen Technologie / Projet de technologie générale (1806). Presses universitaires de Rennes, 123-138, from https://books.openedition.org/pur/154362.
Hoock, Jochen (2017). Johann Beckmann et la place du discours technologique dans la pensée économique de la deuxième moitié du XVIIIe siècle. In (sous la dir.), Guillaume Carnino, Liliane Hilaire-Pérez, Jochen Hoock, La Technologie générale, 105-111, from https://books.openedition.org/pur/154362.
Horst, Gerfried (2020). The Friends of Kant Society, https://www.freunde-kants.com/the-friends-of-kant-society.
Jones, Matthew L. (2016). Reckoning with Matter: Calculating Machines, Innovation, and Thinking about Thinking from Pascal to Babbage. Chicago University Press.
Jones, Matthew L. (2018). Calculating Machine. In Maria-Rosa Antognazza (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Leibniz. Oxford University Press, 509-525.
Kant, Immanuel (2012). Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens or An Essay on the Constitution and the Mechanical Origin of the Entire Structure of the Universe Based on Newtonian Principles (1755), pp. 182-308. In: Immanuel Kant, Natural Science, Edited by Eric Watkins, Cambridge University Press. NTH
Kant, Immanuel (1992). On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World [Inaugural Dissertation] 1770. In: Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770, Translated and Edited by David Walford in collaboration with Ralf Meerbote, Cambridge University Press, 1992. MSI
Kant, Immanuel (1998). Critique of Pure Reason, (1781/1787). Translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge University Press. KrV
Kant, Immanuel (2006a). “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment”, (1784). In Kant, Towards Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. Edited and with an Introduction by Pauline Kleingeld, Translated by David L. Colclasure, with essays by Jeremy Waldron, Michael W. Doyle, Allen W. Wood. Yale University Press. WA
Kant, Immanuel (1997). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785). Translated and edited by Mary Gregor, with an Introduction by Christine M. Korsgaard. Cambridge University Press. GMS
Kant, Immanuel (2015). Critique of Practical Reason (1788). Translated and edited by Mary Gregor, With a revised Introduction by Andrews Reath. Cambridge University Press. KpV
Kant, Immanuel (1987). Critique of Judgment (1790). Translated, with an Introduction, by Werner S. Pluhar, With a Foreword by Mary J. Gregor. Hackett Publishing Company. KU
Kant, Immanuel (2006b). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1798). Translated and edited by Robert B. Louden, with an Introduction by Manfred Kuehn. Cambridge University Press. Anth
Kant, Immanuel (1993). Opus Postumum. Edited with an Introduction and Notes by Eckart Forster, Translated by Eckart Forster and Michael Rosen, Cambridge University Press. OP
Kryluk, Michael (2023), “Reflection 6593: Kant’s Rousseau and the Vocation of the Human Being”, Kant Studien, 114(4),728–758.
Leibniz (2012). Dissertatio exoterica de usu geometriae, et statu praesenti, ac novissimis ejus incrementis (1676). In Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Matematische Schriften, Sechster Band 1673-1676, Arithmetische Kreisquadratur. Akademie Verlag, 483-513.
Maar, Juergen Heinrich (2023). Johann Beckmann (1739-1811) and Modern Chemical Technology, Substantia. 7(1), 79-92.
Möhsen, Johann Karl Wilhelm (1996). What Is to Be Done Towards the Enlightenment of Citizens? In James Schmidt (ed.), What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions. University of California Press, 49-52.
Munzel, G. Felicitas. (2012). Kant's Conception of Pedagogy: Toward Education for Freedom. Northwestern University Press.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (MDCCCLVI). Discours qui a remporté le prix de l’Académie de Dijon, en l’année 1750 : Si le rétablissement des sciences et des arts a contribué à épurer les mœurs ? In Œuvres complètes de J.J. Rousseau, avec des notes historiques, Tome premier (Les confessions, Discours, Politique). Chez Firmin Didot Frères, Libraires, Imprimeurs de l’Institut de France, 465-476.
Schönecker, Dieter (2022), “Kant’s Argument from Moral Feelings: Why Practical Reason Cannot Be Artificial”, in Kant and Artificial Intelligence, Edited by Hyeongjoo Kim and Dieter Schönecker, Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 169-188.
Secord, James A. (2004). “Knowledge in transit”. Isis, Volume 95(4), 654–672.
Stiegler, Bernard (1998). Technics and Time 1: The Fault of Epimetheus (1994). Trans. Richard Beardsworth and George Collins, Stanford University Press.
Wakefield, Andre (2017). Beckmann in Göttingen. In (sous la dir.), Guillaume Carnino, Liliane Hilaire-Pérez, Jochen Hoock, La Technologie générale, 113-121, from https://books.openedition.org/pur/154362.
Christiano Wolfio (MDCCXXXV). Philosophia naturalis sive Logica, Methodo scientifica pertractata, ad usum scientiarum…, Editio terzia emendatior, Veronae, Ex typographia Dionysii Ramanzini, Superiorum permissu.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
