ASSESSING THE LIMITS OF AI-BASED TRANSLATION: A COSERIAN PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2026.1.08Keywords:
Eugenio Coseriu, limits of translation, AI-based translation, Generative AI, ChatGPT, comicsAbstract
Assessing the Limits of AI-Based Translation: A Coserian Perspective. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the way in which AI-based conversational assistants such as ChatGPT, designed to be suitable for use in the field of translation, deal with a translation problem described and analyzed by Eugenio Coseriu in his study Alcances y límites de la traducción (1997). Based on the theoretical framework established by Eugenio Coseriu, who defines translation as: “...a particular type of speech: it is speech with a given content, through another language” (Coseriu, 1997: 168), the main objective of our research is to review the “limits” of translation from Eugenio Coseriu's perspective in order to analyse the degree to which generative artificial intelligence deals with translation difficulties, compared to human translators. To this end, we aim to investigate which translation strategies are used for the linguistic transfer of comics by generative AI. We are particularly interested in observing whether the limits of translation stated by Coseriu correlate with the limits of AI-based translation.
REZUMAT. Evaluarea limitelor traducerii bazate pe IA. O perspectivă coșeriană. Scopul prezentului articol este acela de a analiza modul în care asistenții conversaționali bazați pe IA generativă precum ChatGPT gestionează aspectele problematice ale traducerii descrise și analizate de către Eugenio Coseriu în studiul său Alcances y límites de la traducción (1997). Având ca punct de plecare cadrul teoretic stabilit de către Eugeniu Coșeriu, care definește traducerea ca: «...un tipo particular de hablar: es hablar con un contenido dado de antemano, por medio de otra lengua» (Coseriu, 1997: 168), principalul obiectiv al cercetării noastre este acela de a trece în revistă „limitele” traducerii din perspectiva coșeriană pentru a pune în evidență modul în care IA generativă rezolvă problemele de traducere față de traducătorul uman. Pentru aceasta, dorim să punem în evidență strategiile de traducere utilizare în traducerea benzilor desenate de către IA generativă. Ne vom concentra mai ales asupra observării limitelor traducerii cu care se confruntă IA generativă.
Cuvinte-cheie: Eugeniu Coșeriu, limitele traducerii, traducerea bazată pe IA, IA generativă, ChatGPT, benzi desenate
Article history: Received 09 September 2025; Revised 27 September 2025; Accepted 01 November 2025; Available online 30 March 2026; Available print 30 April 2026.
References
Altakhaineh, Abdel Rahman Mitib, Alghathian, Ghazi Ayed, Jarrah, and Mashal Mufleh. 2025. “A Comparative Study of Accuracy in Human vs. AI Translation of Legal Documents into Arabic.” JLL 14 (2025), 63-80, DOI:10.14762/jll.2025.063.
Baker, Mona. 2018. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619187.
Carrillo Rendón, Mayra Erika, and Mendoza Dueñas, Diego. 2019. "Adaptation et traduction de la bande dessinée d´astérix et cléopâtre en espagnol du mexique." https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12371/15541.
Cazalbou, Renaud. 2023. “Traduire dans les marges ou comment rendre les noms des personnages d'Astérix en espagnol ?”. Reflexos, no. 6/2023. URL: http://interfas.univ-tlse2.fr/reflexos/1337.
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1997. “Alcances y límites de la traducción”. Lexis, vol. XXI. nr. 2, p. 163–184.
Cros, Bernard. 2011. “Du village d’Astérix au village global : historique de cinquante ans de succès”. In Le tour du monde d'Astérix, edited by Richet, Bertrand, 19-38. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. DOI:10.4000/books.psn.6991.
Deilen, Silvana et al. 2023. “Using ChatGPT as a CAT tool”. Easy Language translation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.11563.
Delesse, Catherine, and Richet, Bertrand. 2009. Le coq gaulois à l'heure anglaise : analyse de la traduction anglaise d'Astérix. Arras: Artois presses université.
D'Oria, Domenico, and Conenna, Mirella. 1979. “Sémiologie d'une traduction : Astérix en italien”. Equivalences, 10-1-2, pp. 19-38, URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/equiv_0751-9532_1979_num_10_1_1024.
Fu, Linling., and Liu, Lei. 2024. “What are the differences? A comparative study of generative artificial intelligence translation and human translation of scientific texts”. Humanit Social Sciences Communications 11, 1236 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03726-7.
Gallego, Julie. 2011. “Les citations latines dans Astérix”. In Le tour du monde d'Astérix, edited by Richet, Bertrand, 111-129. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. DOI:10.4000/books.psn.7003.
Gao, Yuan, Wang, Ruili, and Hou, Feng. 2023. “Unleashing the power of ChatGPT for translation: An empirical study”. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02182.
Grammenidis, Simos. 2011. “L’aventure de l’élément culturel dans les traductions d’Astérix en grec”. In Le tour du monde d'Astérix, edited by Richet, Bertrand, 219-233. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. DOI:10.4000/books.psn.7020.
Hatim, Basil, Munday, Jeremy. 2004. Translation: An Advanced Resource Book. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203501887.
He, Zhiwei et al. 2024. “Exploring Human-Like Translation Strategy with Large Language Models”. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 12, 229–246, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00642.
Hendrycks, Dan et al. 2020. “Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding”. ArXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.03300.
Hendy, Amr et al. 2023. How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.09210.
Jiao, W., Wang, W., Huang, J., Wang, X., & Tu, Z. (2023). Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.08745
Keromnes, Yvon. 2013. “Astérix en traduction: les enjeux du figement”. Pratiques: linguistique, littérature, didactique, 159/160, 147-163. https://hal.science/hal-00932857/document.
Lee, Tong King. 2024. “Artificial intelligence and posthumanist translation: ChatGPT versus the translator” Applied Linguistics Review, vol. 15, no. 6, 2024, pp. 2351-2372. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2023-0122.
Lipani-Vaissade, Marie-Christine. 2011. “Les femmes dans Astérix : uniquement des emmerdeuses ?” In Le tour du monde d'Astérix, edited by Richet, Bertrand, 131-148. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. DOI:10.4000/books.psn.7005.
Manolache, Simona-Aida. 2007. “Sur la traduction de la bande dessinée en Roumanie”. In Atelier de Traduction, edited by Steiciuc, Elena-Brândșa, and Manolache, Simona-Aida, n° 8, 265-278. Suceava: Editura Universității Suceava.
Mateiu, Iulia. 2024. “La traduction des noms propres d'Astérix en roumain”, Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Philologica, 1/2024, 275-304, Alba-Iulia: Universitatea „1 Decembrie 1918" din Alba-Iulia.
Rahman, Mostafize, and Watanobe, Yutaka. 2023. “ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies.” Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783.
Richet, Bertrand. (ed.). 2011. Le tour du monde d'Astérix. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle, DOI:10.4000/books.psn.6982.
Richet, Bertrand. 2004. „« On connaît la chanson » – Aspects de la traduction des chansons dans la bande dessinée Astérix .” In Les Cahiers de l’ILCEA, edited by Lavault-Olléon, Élisabeth, no 6, 151-179, Grenoble: Universite Grenoble Alpes.
Sahari, Yousef, Al-Kadi, Abdu M. Talib, and Ali, Jamal Kaid Mohammed. 2023. “A cross sectional study of ChatGPT in translation: Magnitude of use, attitudes, and uncertainties”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(6), 2937–2954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-10031-y.
Shuster, Kurt et al. 2021. “Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation.” arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.07567.
Silva, da Adriano Clayton. 2017. “On Jakobson’s Intersemiotic Translations in Asterix Comics”. Comparatismi, no. 2, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.14672/20171233.
Sinagra, Nathalie. 2011. “Traduire Astérix : atouts et contraintes”. In Le tour du monde d'Astérix, edited by Richet, Bertrand, 181-191. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. DOI:10.4000/books.psn.7014.
Tengler, Karin, Brandhofer, Gerhard. 2025. “Exploring the difference and quality of AI-generated versus human-written texts.” Discov Educ 4, 113 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00529-z.
Touillier-Feyrabend, Henriette. 1998. “Une traduction du comique est-elle possible ? Compte rendu de la table ronde des journées d’étude de la Société d’Ethnologie française consacrées à L’univers d’Astérix (Paris, 24-25 février 1997)”, Ethnologie Française, 28(3), 375–377, URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40990083.
Varga, Cristina. 2010. „Emplois « non canoniques » des signes linguistiques dans les dessins animés”, RIELMA, nr. 3/2010, pp. 95–110. URL: https://lett.ubbcluj.ro/rielma/RIELMA_no3_2010.pdf.
Varga, Cristina. 2022. „Eugeniu Coșeriu – Utilizări „necanonice” ale limbii în benzile desenate și traducerea acestora în română”. Caietele Sextil Pușcariu. Actele Conferinței Internaționale „Zilele Sextil Pușcariu”, Ediția a VI-a, edited by Gabriela Adam et al. Cluj-Napoca, 528-544, Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
