DEMAND FOR GOVERNMENT SPENDING: DO OUR BELIEFS ABOUT PUBLIC DEBT MATTER?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/subboec-2023-0001Keywords:
public spending preferences, public debt expectations, economic knowledge, CESEE, public financeAbstract
Macroeconomic expectations play a major role in predicting individual choices and behavior. This paper examines the effects of public debt expectations and knowledge on demand for government spending measured by individual preferences. Using a unique survey dataset applied in Central and Eastern Europe, the results show that the most knowledgeable citizens tend to support the increase in public spending. Debt expectations also have a significant impact on public spending preferences: citizens who have negative debt expectations are less likely to support public spending increases. The results shed light on the importance of economic knowledge and information provision for shaping public attitudes about future taxation.
JEL classification: D14, D91, H31, H53
References
Alesina, A., Favero, C., Giavazzi, F. (2019) Effects of Austerity: Expenditure- and Tax-based Approaches, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 141 - 162
Arias, E., Stasavage, D. (2019) How Large Are the Political Costs of Fiscal Austerity?, The Journal of Politics, 81, 1517–1522
Bansak, K., Bechtel, M.M., Margalit, Y. (2021) Why Austerity? The Mass Politics of a Contested Policy, American Political Science Review, 115, 486–505
Barnes, L., Hicks, T. (2022) Are Policy Analogies Persuasive? The Household Budget Analogy and Public Support for Austerity, British Journal of Political Science, 52, 1296–1314
Blanchard, O. (2019) Public Debt and Low Interest Rates, American Economic Review, 109, 1197–1229
Blinder, A.S., Krueger, A.B. (2004) What Does the Public Know about Economic Policy, and How Does It Know It?, NBER Working Paper 10787
Bojar, A., Bremer, B., Kriesi, H., Wang, C. (2022) The Effect of Austerity Packages on Government Popularity During the Great Recession, British Journal of Political Science, 52, 181–199
Bremer, B., Bürgisser, R. (2022) Do citizens care about government debt? Evidence from survey experiments on budgetary priorities, European Journal of Political Research, 62, 239 - 263
Brender, A., Drazen, A., Lach, S., Klor, E. (2008) How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries, American Economic Review, 2203–2220
Campbell, A.L. (2012) Policy Makes Mass Politics, Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333–351
de Haan, J., Klomp, J. (2013) Conditional political budget cycles: a review of recent evidence, Public Choice, 157, 387–410
Döring, T., Oehmke, R.D. (2019) About the Economic Psychology of Public Debt, Intereconomics, 297–303
Dubois, E. (2016) Political business cycles 40 years after Nordhaus, Public Choice, 166, 235–259
Eller, M., Jovanovic, B., Scheiber, T. (2021) What do people in CESEE think about public debt?, Focus on European Economic Integration, 35–58
Fetzer, T. (2019) Did Austerity Cause Brexit?, American Economic Review, 109, 3849–86
García, M.J.R. (2013) Financial Education and Behavioral Finance: New Insights into the Role of Information in Financial Decisions, Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 297–315
Giger, N., Nelson, M. (2011) The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity?: the electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment, European Journal of Political Research, 50, 1–23
Hayo, B., Neumeier, F. (2019) Public Preferences for Government Spending Priorities: Survey Evidence from Germany, German Economic Review, 20, e1–e37
Herwartz, H., Theilen, B. (2017) Ideology and redistribution through public spending, European Journal of Political Economy 46, 74–90
Hübscher, E., Sattler, T., Wagner, M. (2021) Voter Responses to Fiscal Austerity, British Journal of Political Science, 51, 1751–1760
Jacobs, A.M. (2011) Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment, Cambridge University Press
Jacques, O., Haffert, L. (2021) Are governments paying a price for austerity? Fiscal consolidations reduce government approval, European Political Science Review, 13, 189–207
Kalbhenn, A., Stracca, L. (2020) Mad about Austerity? The Effect of Fiscal Consolidation on Public Opinion, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 52, 531–548
Lin, C.-A., Bates, T.C. (2022) Smart people know how the economy works: Cognitive ability, economic knowledge and financial literacy, Intelligence 93, 101667
Mankiw, N.G., Reis, R., Wolfers, J. (2003) Disagreement about Inflation Expectations. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 18, 209–248
Montes, G.C., Oliveira, L.V., Curi, A., Nicolay, R.T.F. (2016) Effects of transparency, monetary policy signalling and clarity of central bank communication on disagreement about inflation expectations, Applied Economics 48, 590–607
Philips, A.Q. (2016) Seeing the forest through the trees: a meta-analysis of political budget cycles, Public Choice, 168, 313–341
Potrafke, N. (2011) Does government ideology influence budget composition? Empirical evidence from OECD countries, Econ Gov, 12, 101–134
Rogoff, K. (1988) NBER Working paper 44
Roth, C., Settele, S., Wohlfart, J. (2021) Beliefs about public debt and the demand for government spending, Journal of Econometrics, 231(1), 165-187
Rudolph, T.J., Evans, J. (2005) Political Trust, Ideology, and Public Support for Government Spending, American Journal of Political Science, 49, 660–671
Sargent, T.J. (2013) Rational Expectations and Inflation: Rational Expectations and Inflation, Princeton University Press, 3rd edition
Shapiro, M.D., Slemrod, J. (2009) Did the 2008 Tax Rebates Stimulate Spending?, American Economic Review, 99, 374–379
Soss, J., Schram, S.F. (2007) A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback, Am Polit Sci Rev, 101, 111–127.
Stix, H. (2013) Does the Broad Public Want to Consolidate Public Debt? - The Role of Fairness and of Policy Credibility: Does the Broad Public Want to Consolidate Public Debt?, Kyklos, 66, 102–129.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.