TWO REPORTS ON ETHNO MUSICOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Authors

  • Tudor FERARU ‘Gh. Dima’ Academy of Music, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Contact: tudorfer@hotmail.com

Keywords:

Ethnomusicology, folklore, culture, anthropology, tradition, song, tune, composition, repertoire

Abstract

The two reports attempt to clarify several terminological and classification issues related to the study of folk song. From an ethnomusicologist’s point of view, the concepts of composition, improvisation, authorship, paternity or similarity are not as clear-cut as might be generally understood. Several writings by prominent scholars Bruno Nettl, Alan P. Merriam and Stephen Erdely are used as a base for the debate over these concepts.

The first report focuses on the problem of what exactly constitutes music and musical creation, a question that seems to receive distinct answers in different cultural contexts around the world. The second report presents and compares various methods of classification applied to folk tunes and tune families.

References

Erdely, Stephen, Methods and Principles of Hungarian Ethnomusicology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1965.

Merriam, Alan P., The Anthropology of Music. North-Western University Press, Evanston, 1964.

Nettl, Bruno, The Study of Ethnomusicology: Twenty-Nine Issues and Concepts. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1983.

Downloads

Published

2009-12-30

How to Cite

FERARU, T. (2009). TWO REPORTS ON ETHNO MUSICOLOGICAL RESEARCH. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Musica, 54(2), 127–134. Retrieved from https://studia.reviste.ubbcluj.ro/index.php/subbmusica/article/view/9027

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.