Media Discourse and Political Polarization in the Coverage of the Valencia DANA. A Comparative Analysis of Público and Okdiario
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeph.2025.04Keywords:
framing, media polarization, crisis communicationAbstract
This study examines how ideological bias in digital media contributes to political polarization through comparative analysis of news coverage by comparing the headlines published by Público (left-leaning) and Okdiario (right-leaning), two major Spanish online newspapers, regarding the Valencia DANA disaster that occurred in October 2024. Using content analysis, we analyzed 177 political mentions in the media outlets, examining both manifest content (frequency of political figures and parties mentioned) and latent content (tone and framing). The findings reveal significant differences in how the outlets framed the same crisis event: Público predominantly criticized the Partido Popular and regional government, while Okdiario focused criticism on the PSOE and central government. The results show that media outlets do not merely report events neutrally but actively construct polarized narratives reflecting their editorial stances, amplifying political divisions, particularly during crises, through selective framing and emphasis.
References
Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Bias in the media: How mainstream news coverage reflects corporate interests. Global Environmental Change, 14(3), 205–214.
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017). Is the internet causing political polarization? Evidence from demographics (No. w23258). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Cho, S. H., & Gower, K. K. (2009). How do the news media frame crises? A content analysis of crisis news coverage. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 107–112.
Coombs, W. T. (2015). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Entman, R. M. (2010). Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of Campaign 2008. Journalism, 11(4), 389-408.
Happer, C., & Philo, G. (2013). “The Role of the Media in the Construction of Public Belief and Social Change.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 321–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.96 jspp.psychopen.eu
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.
Monroy-Trujillo, A., & Padilla-Castillo, G. (2025). Media Bias in Immigration Reporting: A Comparative Study of Spanish Newspapers’ Source Usage. Journalism and Media, 6(4), 160.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
Sampedro, V. (2020). Dominating strategy: Spain's media system in a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(3), 389–407.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.
Schweiger, W. (2019). Digital erosion: Rethinking the internet in the age of algorithmic distortions. Springer.
Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news and political participation: How consuming intentionally and unintentionally political news affects civic engagement. Journalism, 12(3), 311–327.
Tandoc Jr, E. C., & Vos, T. P. (2016). The journalist is a citizen now: Social media and journalistic norms. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 904–923.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Ephemerides
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
