La Coupure et la paranoïa de l’acte meurtrier. Entre Altman et Buñuel

Authors

  • Flaviu-Victor CÂMPEAN Département de Philosophie, Université Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Roumanie; Centre de Philosophie Appliquée, Université Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Roumanie; Membre et Président du Forum du Champ Lacanien Roumanie. Email: flaviucampean@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbdrama.2021.1.04

Keywords:

cut, act, paranoia, killing, Altman, Buñuel.

Abstract

The Cut and the Paranoia of the Killing Act. Between Altman and Buñuel. This paper aims to explore the psychoanalytic roots and affinities in Robert Altman and Luis Buñuel with respect to the mechanisms of the constitution of the subject. More specifically, I approach the function of the cut as both a mark of the subject and within a so-called paranoid act. Thus, in a Lacanian interpretation, the cut involves topology, the relation with the object, separation and alienation and, ultimately, the pure loss.

Author Biography

Flaviu-Victor CÂMPEAN, Département de Philosophie, Université Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Roumanie; Centre de Philosophie Appliquée, Université Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Roumanie; Membre et Président du Forum du Champ Lacanien Roumanie. Email: flaviucampean@gmail.com

Flaviu-Victor Câmpean (b. 1984) is philosopher and the president of the Forum of the Lacanian Field, Romania. He taught Modern and Contemporary Philosophy and Philosophy of Law at Babeș-Bolyai University in Cluj-Napoca. He holds a PhD in Philosophy with a thesis entitled The Melancholy Identity in Søren Kierkegaard, published as a book at Școala Ardeleană & Eikon Publishing House Cluj-Napoca in 2020. He accomplished research trips in Lyon and Copenhagen. His interests include Modern and Contemporary Continental Philosophy with an emphasis on the 19th and 20th centuries, Classical and Contemporary Theology, Psychoanalysis, French Phenomenology, Political Philosophy, the Philosophical and Psychoanalytical approaches of Cinema and Literature.

References

Altman on Altman. Edited by David Thompson. Introd. by Paul Thomas Anderson. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006.

Bruno, Pierre. Une psychanalyse : du rébus au rebut. Toulouse : Eres, 2013.

Dahan, Patricia. « Institution, destitution ». Mensuel EPFCL 132, avril (2019) : 6-10.

Deleuze, Gilles. Cinéma 1. L’Image-mouvement. Paris : Les Éditions de Minuit, 1983.

Izcovich, Luis. « L’être de jouissance ». L’en-je lacanien 11, no. 2 (2008) : 35-46.

Izcovich, Luis. Les paranoïaques et la psychanalyse. Stilus, Collection Nouages, 2017.

Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris : Seuil, 1966.

Lacan, Jacques. L’Etourdit. http://staferla.free.fr/Lacan/letourdit.htm

Lacan, Jacques. Séminaire. Livre XI. Fondements. http://staferla.free.fr/S11/S11.htm

Lacan, Jacques. Séminaire XX. Encore. http://staferla.free.fr/S20/S20.htm

Lacan, Jacques. Télévision. http://staferla.free.fr/Lacan/television.htm

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Le cinéma et la nouvelle psychologie. Paris : Gallimard, 2009.

Miller, Jacques-Alain. Lacan regarde le cinéma, le cinéma regarde Lacan. Huysmans, 2011.

STUDIA UBB DRAMATICA, Volume 66 (LXVI), No. 1, March 2021

Downloads

Published

2021-03-30

How to Cite

CÂMPEAN, F.-V. (2021). La Coupure et la paranoïa de l’acte meurtrier. Entre Altman et Buñuel. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Dramatica, 66(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbdrama.2021.1.04

Issue

Volume 66, No. 1, March 2021

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Dramatica

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.