From instinct to experience: understanding feeding behaviour in Python regius (Shaw, 1802)

Authors

  • Octavian CRAIOVEANU Academic Cultural Heritage Department – Vivarium, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Vlad STOICESCU Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty for Biology and Geology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Cristina CRAIOVEANU Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty for Biology and Geology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Sociobiology and Insect Ecology Lab, Centre 3 B, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. ✉Corresponding author, E-mail: cristina.craioveanu@ubbcluj.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3683-2015

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbbiol.2025.2.09

Keywords:

Ball pythons, feeding behaviour, feeding efficiency, snake learning, time budget

Abstract

Research on the cognitive abilities and behaviour of reptiles is quite limited, largely due to the challenges in accurately quantifying and interpreting observations made in both natural and controlled settings. This limitation is particularly notable in the study of snakes, where investigations into the cognitive skills of this suborder are scarce. In this study, we focused on the feeding behaviour of young Python regius specimens to explore whether these behaviours are purely instinctual or if they involve learning and/or using previously acquired knowledge. We observed eight naive juvenile individuals to analyse their feeding behaviour. Our hypothesis proposed that as these snakes gained experience in the first month of their lives, their feeding efficiency would improve. We recorded and analysed the time allocated to various stages of their feeding behaviours during their initial four feedings. The findings we obtained were unexpected and partially contradicted our initial assumptions. Ultimately, we concluded that the feeding efficiency in these reptiles presents a complex interplay of instinct, past experiences, and certain factors that remain challenging to explain within the framework of existing specialised literature.

Article history: Received 08 September 2025; Revised 18 December 2025;
Accepted 18 December 2025; Available online 20 December 2025

References

Arnold, S.J. (1978). Some effects of early experience on feeding responses in the common garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. Anim. Behav. 26 (2), 455-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(78)90062-3

Bealor, M.T. & Saviola, A.J. (2007). Behavioural complexity and prey-handling ability in snakes: Gauging the benefits of constriction. Behav. 144(8), 907–929. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853907781492690

Brockmann, H.J. (1994). Measuring behaviour: Ethograms, kinematic diagrams, and time budgets. Technical document, Department of Biology, University of Florida, USA.

Burghardt, G.M. (1973). Instinct and innate behavior: Toward an ethological psychology. In J. A. Nevin & G. S. Reynolds, The study of behavior: Learning, motivation, emotion, and instinct. Scott, Foresman.

Burghardt, G.M. (1977). Learning processes in reptiles. In: Biology of the Reptilia: Ecology and behaviour (Gans, C. & Tinkle, D.W., eds). Academic Press, London. 555-681.

Burghardt, G.M. (2013). Environmental enrichment and cognitive complexity in reptiles and amphibians: concepts, review, and implications for captive populations. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 147, 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.04.013

D'Cruze, N., Harrington, L.A., Assou, D., Green, J., Macdonald, D.W., Ronfot, D., Segniagbeto, G.H. & Auliya, M. (2020). Betting the farm: A review of ball python and other reptile trade from Togo, West Africa. Nat. Conserv. 40, 65–91. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.40.48046

De Meester, G. & Baeckens, S. (2021). Reinstating reptiles: from clueless creatures to esteemed models of cognitive biology. Behaviour. 158(12-13), 1057-1076. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003718

Fuchs, J.L. & Burghardt, G.M. (1971). Effects of early feeding experience on the responses of garter snakes to food chemicals. Learn. Motivat. 2, 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(71)90027-0

Garland, T. & Arnold, S.J. (1983). Effects of full stomach on locomotory performance of juvenile garter snakes (Thamnophis elegans). Copeia. 4, 1092-1096. https://doi.org/10.2307/1445117

Goetz, S.M., Godwin, J.C., Hoffman, M., Antonio, F. & Steen, D.A. (2018). Eastern indigo snakes exhibit an innate response to pit viper scent and an ontogenetic shift in their response to mouse scent. Herpetologica 74(2), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-17-00070.1

Jerison, H.J. (1973). Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Academic Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4137.677

MacLean, P.D. (1985). Brain evolution relating to family, play and the separation call. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 42, 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790270095011

Matsubara, S., Deeming, D.C. & Wilkinson, A. (2017). Cold-blooded cognition: New directions in reptile cognition. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 16, 126-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.06.006

Mehta, R.S. (2009). Early experience shapes the development of behavioral repertoires of hatchling snakes. J. Ethol. 27, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0097-9

Moon, B. (2000). The mechanics and muscular control of constriction in gopher snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus) and a king snake (Lampropeltis getula). J. Zool. 252, 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00823.x

Mori, A. (1993). Does feeding experience with different size of prey influence the subsequent prey-handling behavior in Elaphe climacophora? J. Ethol. 11, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350050

Nafus, M.G., Xiong P. X., Paxton, E.H., Yackel Adams A.A. & Goetz, S. M. (2021). Foraging behavior in a generalist snake (brown treesnake, Boiga irregularis) with implications for avian reintroduction and recovery. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 243, 0168-1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105450

Ogle, D.H., Doll, J.C, Wheeler, A.P. & Dinno, A. (2025). FSA: Simple fisheries stock assessment methods. R package version 0.10.0, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FSA

RStudio Team. (2025). RStudio, 2025.05.1+513 "Mariposa Orchid" Release (ab7c1bc795c7dcff8f26215b832a3649a19fc16c, 2025-06-01) for windows

Ryerson, W.G., (2020) Ontogeny of strike performance in ball pythons (Python regius): A three-year longitudinal study. Zool., 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2020.125780

Sagan, C. (1977). The dragons of Eden: Speculations on the evolution of human intelligence. Random House, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330500115

Suboski, M.D. (1992). Releaser-induced recognition learning by amphibians and reptiles. Animal L&B 20, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199947

Szabo, B., Noble, D.W.A. & Whiting, M.J. (2021). Learning in non-avian reptiles 40 years on: advances and promising new directions. Biol. Rev. 96, 331-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12658

Turner, C.H. (1892). A few characteristics of the avian brain. Science 19, 16-17. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-19.466.16

Westhoff, G. (2005). Expert report on the suitability of Geo Rack I systems (manufacturer: Lanzo Herp Cages) for species-appropriate husbandry and rearing of the ball python (Python regius). https://www.lanzo-herp.de/Gutachten/Expertises

Whiting, M.J. & Noble, D.W.A. (2018). Lizards - measuring cognition: practical challenges and the influence of ecology and social behaviour. In: Field and laboratory methods in animal cognition (eds N. Bueno-Guerra and F. Amici). 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333191.014

Wilkinson, A. & Huber, L. (2012). Cold-blooded cognition: reptilian cognitive abilities. In: The Oxford handbook of comparative evolutionary psychology (eds J. Vonk and T. K. Shackelford). 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738182.013.0008

World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA). (2023). WAZA Code of Ethics [PDF document]. WAZA | World Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

CRAIOVEANU, O., STOICESCU, V., & CRAIOVEANU, C. (2025). From instinct to experience: understanding feeding behaviour in Python regius (Shaw, 1802). Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Biologia, 70(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbbiol.2025.2.09

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.