Once More on Mk 16.9-20
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/sacrascripta.2021.01Keywords:
Galilee, resurrection, Hellenism, diaspora, Mark’s long endingAbstract
For the diaspora and the first pagan Christians, Galilee was not an authoritative centre of the Hellenistic era, therefore, in the accounts of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, this event is either simply transferred to Jerusalem (Luke) or separated from the main text by a colophon (John) or questioned in parts of the manuscript tradition (Mark), which influences the modern criticism.
References
BLACK D. A. and D. BOCK, K. ELLIOTT, M. ROBINSON, D. WALLACE. Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: 4 views. Ed. by D. A. BLACK. Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee, 2008.
CULPEPPER R. A. Mark. Smyth & Helwys Publishing, 2007.
HENGEL M. The ‘Hellenization’ of Judaea in the First Century after Christ. In collaboration with Christoph Markschies. London; Philadelphia, 1989.
LUNN N. P. The Original Ending of Mark: A New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9-20, Cambridge: James Clarke & Co, 2015.
SCHOEPS H. J. Paul: The Theology of the Apostle in the Light of Jewish Religious History. London, 1961.
TAYLOR V. The Gospel According to St. Mark. London, 1966.
TCHERIKOVER V. Hellenistic Civilization and the Jews. Translated by S. APPLEBAUM. Philadelphia; Jerusalem, 1959.
TELFORD W. R. The Theology of the Gospel of Mark. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Sacra Scripta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
