NUTRIENT AND ORGANIC MATTER REMOVAL FROM CHICKEN MANURE LEACHATE USING CHLORELLA SPP.

Authors

  • Zamfira DINCĂ INCDO-INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-6525
  • Maria-Alexandra HOAGHIA INCDO-INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Anamaria Iulia TÖRÖK INCDO-INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-6525
  • Eniko KOVACS INCDO-INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 3-5 Calea Manastur Street, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-6525
  • Oana CADAR INCDO-INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-6525
  • Emilia NEAG INCDO-INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-6525
  • Cecilia ROMAN INCDO-INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-6525

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2021.2.18

Keywords:

biomass, chicken manure, microalgae.

Abstract

In the present study, the use of chicken manure leachate (CML) as a nutrient source for the cultivation of Chlorella spp. at laboratory scale was investigated. The concentration of total organic carbon (TOC) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) was monitored during 15 days of cultivation in CML. The changes of pH, conductivity, Cl-, PO43-, SO42-, NO2- and NO3- concentrations were measured during the growth period. The BOD and TOC reduction was 96.4% and 86.1%, respectively after 15 days of cultivation in CML. The Chlorella spp. biomass cultured in CML had a high protein content compared to the biomass grown in the BG-11 medium. The obtained results suggest the potential use of CML as a nutrient source for the growth of Chlorella spp.

References

FAO, 2018 http://www.fao.org/3/I8153EN/i8153en.pdf

Eurostat, 2020 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Agricultural_production_-_livestock_and_meat&oldid=470510#Poultry

X.T. Han; N. Rusconi; P. Ali; K. Pagkatipunan; F. Chen; Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2017, 7, 101-113

H.M. Singh; V.V. Tyagi; R. Kothari; R. Azam; P.S. Slathia; B. Singh; Bioresour. Technol., 2020, 316, 123850

P. Smith et al. How much land‐based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?, In Global Change Biology, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2013, Volume 19, Issue 8, pp. 2285-2302

Y. Alba Reyes; E.L. Barrera; K.-k. Cheng; J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2021, 9, 104695

G. Markou; F. Monlau; Nutrient recycling for sustainable production of algal biofuels, in Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals, Biofuels from Algae (Second Edition), A. Pandey, J.-S. Chang, C.R. Soccol, D.-J. Lee, Y. Chisti Eds.; Elsevier, 2019, Chapter 6, pp. 109-133

A.J. Ashworth; J.P. Chastain; P.A. Moore Jr.; Nutrient Characteristics of Poultry Manure and Litter, in Animal Manure: Production, Characteristics, Environmental Concerns, and Management, Volume 67, H.M. Waldrip, P.H. Pagliari, Z. He Eds.; American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., 2020, pp. 63-87

M.M. Amanullah; S. Sekar; P. Muthukrishnan; Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2010, 9, 172-182

R. Li; N. Duan; Y. Zhang; Z. Liu; B. Li; D. Zhang; H. Lu; T. Dong; Waste Manage., 2017, 70, 247-254,

T. Moungmoon; C. Chaichana; C. Pumas; W. Pathom-aree; K. Ruangrit; J. Pekkoh; Sci. Total Environ., 2020, 714, 136577

R. Malolan; R.S.Jayaraman; S. Adithya; J. Arun; K.P. Gopinath; P.S. Sundar Rajan; O. Nasif; W. Kim; M. Govarthanan; Chemosphere, 2021, 266,128963

M. Altunoz; O. Pirrotta; L. Forti; G. Allesina; S. Pedrazzi; O. Obali; P. Tartarini; L. Arru; Bioresour. Technol., 2017, 244, Part 2, 1261-1268

S.S.M. Mostafa; E.A. Shalaby; G.I. Mahmoud, Not. Sci. Biol., 2012, 4(1), 56-65

S. Zhu; L. Qin; P. Feng; C. Shang; Z. Wang; Z. Yuan; Bioresour. Technol., 2019, 274, 313-320.

G. Vargas; A. Donoso-Bravo; C. Vergara; G. Ruiz-Filippi, Electron. J. Biotechnol., 2016, 23, 63-68.

A. Kumar; S. Bera, Bioresour. Technol. Rep., 2020, 12, 100584.

M. Holtappels; G. Lavik; M.M. Jensen; M.M.M. Kuypers; 15N-Labeling Experiments to Dissect the Contributions of Heterotrophic Denitrification and Anammox to Nitrogen Removal in the OMZ Waters of the Ocean, in Methods in Enzymology; M. G. Klotz Ed.; Academic Press, 2011, Chapter 10, Volume 486, pp. 223-251

A. Sánchez-Bayo; V. Morales; R. Rodríguez; G. Vicente Crespo; L. F. Bautista; Preprints, 2019, 110108, doi: 10.20944/preprints201911.0108.v1.

U.D. Enyidi; Fishes, 2017, 2, 17.

T. Bito; E. Okumura; M. Fujishima; F. Watanabe; Nutrients., 2020, 12, 2524.

L. Rendón-Castrillón; M. Ramírez-Carmona; C. Ocampo-López; R. Giraldo-Aristizabal, Braz. J. Biol., 2021, 81(1), 202-209.

STUDIA UBB CHEMIA, Volume 66 (LXVI), No. 2, June 2021

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

DINCĂ, Z., HOAGHIA, M.-A., TÖRÖK, A. I., KOVACS, E., CADAR, O., NEAG, E., & ROMAN, C. (2021). NUTRIENT AND ORGANIC MATTER REMOVAL FROM CHICKEN MANURE LEACHATE USING CHLORELLA SPP . Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia, 66(2), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2021.2.18

Issue

Volume 66, No. 2, 2021

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.