A Qualitative Study of Truthful, Deceptive, and Mixed Interactions in a Daily Diary Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.2026.1.06Keywords:
daily communication, truthful information, deception, embedded lies, qualitative studyAbstract
Communication is the cornerstone of socialization. In their daily life, people share their feelings, opinions, or plans. These details can indicate the sender’s true intentions or be strategically distorted, depending on the specific conversational goals. Most research on daily communication is quantitative, with few studies examining what is being said across contexts in a qualitative approach. Additionally, research on deception tends to treat truth and lies as two separate, dichotomous yet heterogeneous categories. However, emerging data on embedded deception show that most of the time, people mix truthful and deceptive information in the message, with very rare instances of completely deceptive interactions. The current qualitative study is a partial replication and extension of the seminal DePaulo et al.’s (1996) study, aiming to provide an up-to-date look at individuals' communication patterns in daily life. Using a daily diary method, 30 participants were asked to record details about their social interactions over 2 weeks. We classified 1,307 responses based on their content and referent. Additionally, in contrast with previous research, we organized these reports as truthful, deceptive, or instances in which both truthful and deceptive details were provided. Our thematic analysis revealed that truthful and deceptive interactions contained references to feelings, actions, and explanations. They are most often related to the sender of the message, as well as objects, events, and places. We discuss the findings in relation to the available literature on daily deception.
References
Arcimowicz, B., Cantarero, K., & Soroko, E. (2015). Motivation and consequences of lying. A qualitative analysis of everyday lying. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16 (3).
Arslan, R. C., Walther, M. P., & Tata, C. S. (2020). formr: A study framework allowing for automated feedback generation and complex longitudinal experience-sampling studies using R. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 376–387. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01236-y
Arslan, R.C., & Tata, C.S. (2026). formr: A study framework allowing for automated feedback generation and complex longitudinal experience sampling studies using R. (version v0.22.0).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cacuci, S-A., & Visu-Petra, L. (2026). A scoping review of the literature on embedded truths and lies in investigative research. Cognition. Brain. Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(1), 63-103. https://doi.org/10.24193/cbb.2026.30.04
Cantarero, K., Van Tilburg, W. A., & Szarota, P. (2018). Differentiating everyday lies: A typology of lies based on beneficiary and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.013
Curtis, D. A., Levine, T. R., Hart, C. L., & Serota, K. B. (2021). Does information about the frequency of lying impact perceptions of honesty? North American Journal of Psychology, 23(2), 193-208.
Daiku, Y., Serota, K. B., & Levine, T. R. (2021). A few prolific liars in Japan: Replication and the effects of Dark Triad personality traits. PLoS One, 16(4), e0249815. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249815
DePaulo, B. M. (2009). Behind the door of deceit. Understanding the biggest liars in our lives. Author.
DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 979–995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979
Duck, S., & McMahan, D. T. (2017). Communication in everyday life: A survey of communication. Sage Publications.
Evans, A. D., Dykstra, V. W., & O’Connor, A. M. (2025). Differences in daily lie-telling patterns from adolescence to older adulthood. Applied Developmental Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2025.2486063
Gnisci, A., Caso, L., & Vrij, A. (2010). Have you made up your story? The effect of suspicion and liars' strategies on reality monitoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 762-773. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1584
Guthrie, J., & Kunkel, A. (2013). Tell me sweet (and not-so-sweet) little lies: Deception in romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 64(2), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.755637
Halevy, R., Verschuere, B., & Shalvi, S. (2014). Many liars prove honest about their dishonesty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310776111
Leins, D. A., Fisher, R. P., & Ross, S. J. (2013). Exploring liars’ strategies for creating deceptive reports. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(1), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02041.x
Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-Default Theory (TDT). Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535916
Levine, T. R. (2019). Duped: Truth-default theory and the social science of lying and deception. University Alabama Press.
Loconte, R., & Kleinberg, B. (2025). Examining embedded lies through computational text analysis. Scientific Reports, 15, 26482. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11327-w
Ma, S., Chen, E.E., & Yik, M. (2026). When honesty meets modesty: Development of evaluations on lying about achievements. Developmental Science, 29(3), e70170. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70170
Martinez, R. J., Punyanunt-Carter, N. M., Levine, T. R., & Serota, K. B. (2026). Everyday interpersonal deception among college-aged respondents: a directed content analysis. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2026.2665612
Masip, J., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2004). Defining deception. Anales de Psicologia, 20(1), 147-171. http://hdl.handle.net/10201/8026
Markowitz, D. M. (2023). Toward a deeper understanding of prolific lying: Building a profile of situation-level and individual-level characteristics. Communication Research, 50(1), 80-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221097041
McArthur, J., Jarvis, R., Bourgeois, C., & Ternes, M. (2022). Lying motivations: Exploring personality correlates of lying and motivations to lie. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 54(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000328
McCornack, S. A. (1992). Information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376245
Moldoveanu, M. G., & Visu-Petra, L. (2025). Self-deception beyond speculation: A narrative review of the empirical research on motivated false beliefs. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Psychologia-Paedagogia, 70(1). https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.2025.1.06Morrison, K., & McCornack, S. A. (2025). Can we be honest? Cognition, intention, speech production, and the future of dception research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 45(1), 122-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X251364005
Mühl, J. (2018). Human beings as social beings: Gerda Walther’s anthropological approach. In A. Calcagno (Ed.), Gerda Walther’s phenomenology of sociality, psychology, and religion. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, Vol. 2 (pp. 111–128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97592-4_6
Serota, K. B., Levine, T. R., & Boster, F. J. (2010). The prevalence of lying in America: Three studies of self reported lies. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01366.x
Serota, K. B., Levine, T. R., & Docan Morgan, T. (2022). Unpacking variation in lie prevalence: Prolific liars, bad lie days, or both? Communication Monographs, 89(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2021.1985153
Serota, K. B., Levine, T. R., Zvi, L., Markowitz, D. M., & Docan-Morgan, T. (2024). The ubiquity of long-tail lie distributions: Seven studies from five continents. Journal of Communication, 74(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqad040
Verigin, B. L., Meijer, E. H., Bogaard, G., & Vrij, A. (2019). Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars. PloS ONE, 14(12), e0225566. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225566
Visu-Petra, L., Prodan N., & Talwar, V. (2022). Children’s lies: Intersecting cognitive development, theory of mind, and socialization. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.) The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Social Development. Second Edition (pp. 668-687). Wiley-Blackwell, UK.
Weiss, B. & Feldman, R. S. (2006), Looking good and lying to do it: Deception as an impression management strategy in job interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 1070-1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00055.x
Williams, S. M., Kirmayer, M., Simon, T., & Talwar, V. (2013). Children's antisocial and prosocial lies to familiar and unfamiliar adults. Infant and Child Development, 22(4), 430-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1802
Zvi, L., Serota, K. B., & Levine, T. R. (2026). Does the dark triad influence the nature and frequency of lying? Communication Studies, 77(2), 246-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2025.2507669
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Psychologia-Paedagogia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
