DIASPORA BELONGING BETWEEN EXCLUSIONARY ISOLATIONIST DISCOURSES AND COSMOPOLITAN IDEALS

Authors

  • Teodor STAN International Relations with the Faculty of European Studies, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. E-mail: teodorstan@gmail.com.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2024.2.14

Keywords:

belonging, long-distance nationalism, transnationalism, diaspora cultural identity, Romanian American diaspora, autobiographic narratives

Abstract

Reviewed literature on “long-distance nationalism” with its roots in methodological nationalism and more recent constructivist theoretical frameworks that allow for the fluidity of identity, intersectionality of social power dynamics and regard for the immigrant connectivity and simultaneity of virtual presences, provide us with a spectrum of analytical lenses. The mechanism that explains either isolationist, exclusivist tendencies in some migrants or their agency as envisaged promoters of cosmopolitan lifestyles, rests in the stories migrants tell about themselves and how they choose to structure emotional affinity into identity constructs of self and others. While accommodating the theoretical framework of seeing diasporas as transnational digital networks or as amorphous “imagined communities” potentially molded by political elites, this article chooses to consider diaspora affiliation as a category of social practice, fulfilling psychosocial needs of self-actualization. This theoretical framework provides the basis for semi-structured autobiographic interviews and analysis of narratives, as artefacts structuring the basis of belonging and othering within first- and second-generation of Romanian American migrants. This analysis may help examine how diaspora engagement with state actors is decoupled from the native territory’s evolution and governance. It also intends to be the basis for recommendations for further research to better understand transatlantic diasporas and to inform potential policy making with regards to engaging diaspora community entities in promoting cultural identity resilience, skills that protect and promote the positive anchoring of members.

References

1. Alinejad, Donya; Candidatu, Laura; Mevsimler, Melis; Minchilli, Claudia; Ponzanesi, Sandra; van der Vlist, Fernando (2019), “Diaspora and Mapping Methodologies: Tracing Transnational Digital Connections with ‘Mattering Maps.’” Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs 19, no. 1, 21-43.

2. Anderson, Benedict (1992), Long-distance Nationalism: World Capitalism and the Rise of Identity Politics. Berkeley, CA: Center for German and European Studies, University of California.

3. Anderson, Benedict (1998), The Spectre of Comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia, and the World. London: Verso.

4. Anderson, Benedict R. (1996 rev. ed. 2016), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso.

5. Baldassar, Loretta; Nedelcu, Mihalea; Merla, Laura; Wilding, Raelene (2016), “ICT-Based Co-Presence in Transnational Families and Communities: Challenging the Premise of Face-to-Face Proximity in Sustaining Relationships.” Global Networks 16, no. 2, 133-144.

6. Billig, Michael (1995), Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.

7. Brubaker, Rogers (2001), “The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and Its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States.” Journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies 24, no. 4: 531-548.

8. Brubaker, Rogers (2004), Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

9. Christensen, Miyase; Jansson, André (2015), “Complicit Surveillance, Interveillance, and the Question of Cosmopolitanism.” New Media & Society 17, no. 9: 1473-1491.

10. Dieckhoff, Alain (2017), “The Jewish Diaspora and Israel: Belonging at Distance?” Nations and Nationalism 23, no. 2, 271-288.

11. .Diminescu, Dana (2008), “The Connected Migrant: An Epistemological Manifesto.” Social Science Information 47, no. 4, 565-579.

12. Diminescu, Dana (2012), “Introduction: Digital Methods for the Exploration, Analysis and Mapping of e-Diasporas.” Social Science Information 51, no. 4: 451-458.

13. Edensor, Tim (2002), National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life, Oxford: Berg.

14. Fox, Jon E.; Jones, Cynthia (2013), “Migration, Everyday Life and the Ethnicity Bias.” Ethnicities, 13, no. 4, 385-400.

15. Gans, Herbert J. (2007), “Discussion Article: Acculturation, Assimilation and Mobility.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, no. 1, 152-164.

16. Ghorashi, Halleh (2004), “How Dual Is Transnational Identity? A Debate on Dual Positioning of Diaspora Organizations” in Culture and Organization, 10, no. 4, 329-340.

17. Glick Schiller, Nina (2004) “Long-Distance Nationalism” in Ember, Carol; Ember, Melvin; Skoggard, Ian (eds.) Encyclopedia of Diasporas: Immigrant and Refugee Cultures Around the World, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 570–580.

18. Glick Schiller, Nina; Fouron, Georges E. (2001), Georges Woke-up Laughing: Long-Distance Nationalism and the Search for Home, Durham and London: Duke University Press.

19. Gordon, Milton M. (1964), Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins, New York: Oxford University Press.

20. Hage, Ghassan (2010), “Migration, Food, Memory, and Home-Building,” in Radstone, Susannah; Schwarz, Bill (eds.), Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates, New York: Fordham University Press, 416-427.

21. Hall, Stuart (2000), “Who Needs ‘Identity’?” in du Gay, Paul; Evans, Jessica; Redman, Peter (eds.), Identity: A Reader, London: Sage Publications, 15-30.

22. Jansson, André (2018), Mediatization and Mobile Lives: A Critical Approach, New York, NY: Routledge.

23. Leurs, Koen; Ponzanesi, Sandra (2018), “Connected Migrants: Encapsulation and Cosmopolitanization” in Popular Communication, 16, no. 1, 4–20.

24. Levitt, Peggy (2001), “Transnational Migration: Taking Stock and Future Directions” in Global Networks, 1, no. 3, 195–216.

25. Madianou, Mirca (2014), “Polymedia Communication and Mediatized Migration” in Lundby, Knut (ed.), Mediatization of Communication, Berlin: De Gruyter, 323–348.

26. .Marino, Stefania (2015), “Making Space, Making Place: Digital Togetherness and the Redefinition of Migrant Identities Online.” Social Media + Society, 1, no. 2, 1-9.

27. McAuley, Jim (2015), “Memory and Belonging in Ulster Loyalist Identity” Irish Political Studies, 31, no. 1, 122-138.

28. Misztal, Barbara A. (2010), “Collective Memory in a Global Age: Learning How and What to Remember” Current Sociology, 58, no. 1, 24-44.

29. Skrbiš, Zlatko (1999), Long-Distance Nationalism: Diasporas, Homelands and Identities, London and New York: Routledge.

30. Triandafyllidou, Anna (2006), “Nations, Migrants and Transnational Identifications: An Interactive Approach to Nationalism” in Delanty, Gerard; Kumar, Krishan (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Nations and Nationalism, London: Sage, 285-306.

31. Triandafyllidou, Anna (2020), “Nationalism in the 21st Century: Neo-Tribal or Plural?” Nations and Nationalism, 26, no. 4, 792-806.

32. Vermeulen, Floris; Keskiner, Elif (2017), “Bonding or Bridging? Professional Network Organizations of Second-Generation Turks in the Netherlands and France,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40, no. 2, 301-320.

33. Zahra, Tara (2016), The Great Departure: Mass Migration from Eastern Europe and the Making of the Free World, New York: W. W. Norton.

34. Zerubavel, Eviatar (2003) Time Maps: Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

STAN, T. (2024). DIASPORA BELONGING BETWEEN EXCLUSIONARY ISOLATIONIST DISCOURSES AND COSMOPOLITAN IDEALS. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Studia Europaea, 69(2), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2024.2.14

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.