ROMANIAN SOCIAL MOVEMENT: BETWEEN REPOLITICIZATION AND REINFORCEMENT OF THE STATUS-QUO (2012-2017)

Authors

  • Victoria STOICIU MA graduate, National School of Administration and Political Sciences, Bucharest; PhD student, Faculty of European Studies, Babes Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: victoria.stoiciu@gmail.com.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2017.3.08

Keywords:

social movements, austerity, depoliticization, anti-system discourse, emancipation

Abstract

The article states that the social movement that emerged in Romania in 2012 is part of the global anti-austerity movement. It proposes the movement’s analysis in the key of Karl Polanyi’s theory of double movement, portraying it as a counter-movement opposing the third way of marketization, which involves commodification through dispossession of access to water, land, air and other free public goods. The articles shows how the movement, which started as an anti-system protest articulated a series of claims that contested the post-communist consensus and revealed some fundamental conflicts of the society, obscured and mystified by the dominant power structures. It demonstrates that the social movement’s anti-system agenda had a powerful repoliticization potential and announced a new discursive regime challenging the hegemonic discourse, which uses depoliticization tactics for maintaining the existing power structures. The article describes how in parallel to the anti-system discourse the social movement accommodated an anti-governmental narrative that became dominant in the most recent protests of 2017, diminishing the repoliticization and, thus, the emancipatory potential of the movement.

References

Badiou, Alain (2010), Communist Hypothesis, London: Verso.

Buden, Boris (2009), Zone des Übergangs (The Zone of Transition. On the End of Post-Communism), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Burawoy, Michael (2005), “Third-Wave Sociology and the End of Pure Science”, in The American Sociologist, Fall/Winter 2005

Burawoy, Michael (2013), Times of Turmoil: Emerging Visions from Three Years of Global Dialogue, Paper presented at the Third ISA Conference of the Council of National Associations, May 13-16, 2013 at Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Burnham, Peter (2001), “New Labour and the politics of depoliticisation” in The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 3: 127–149.

Della Porta, Donatella (2015), Social Movements in Times of Austerity, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Crouch, Collin (2004), Post-Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press

Cerny, Philip G. (2008), “Embedding Neoliberalism: The Evolution of a Hegemonic Paradigm”, in The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy, Vol. 2, No. 1.

Craciun, Claudiu (2017) Romania’s Second Democratic Transition, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Department for Central and Eastern Europe, 2017.

Gramsci, Antonio; Buttigieg, Joseph A, ed., (1992), Prison Notebooks, New York City: Columbia University Press.

Hay, Colin (2013), Why We Hate Politics, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Kaldor, Mary; Selchow, Sabine, eds. (2015), Subterranean Politics in Europe, Palgrave Macmillan.

Laclau, Ernesto; Mouffe, Chantal (2001), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy – Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd ed., London & New York: Verso.

Marchart, Olivier (2007), Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Margarit, Diana (2016) “The Days We Don’t Give in- the Romanian Social Movements Between 2012 and 2015”, on Eastblog, [http://eastblog.univie.ac.at/2016/01/13/the-days-we-dont-give-in-the-romanian-social-movements-between-2012-and-2015], 13 January 2016.

Mouffe, Chantal (2005), On the Political, London: Routledge.

Plavšić, Dragan (2017), The Romanian Protests. Why Have Hundreds of Thousands of Romanians Taken to the Streets this Month Against a Nominally Center-Left Government? https://www.jacobinmag.com/ 2017/02/romania-protests-corruption-psd-iohannis-austerity], 22 February 2017.

Polanyi, Karl (2001), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Press.

Rancière, Jacques (2000), Le Partage du Sensible: Esthétique et Politique, Paris: La Fabrique-Éditions.

Rancière, Jacques (2001), “Ten Theses on Politics”, in Theory and Event, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1–21.

Rancière, Jacques (2010a), Chronicles of Consensual Times, London: Continuum.

Schedler, Adreas ed., (1996), The End of Politics? Explorations into Modern Antipolitics, London and New York: Macmillan and St Martin's.

Stephan, Benjamin; Rothe, Delf; Methmann, Chrus (2014), „Third Side of the Coin: Hegemony and Governmentality in Global Climate Politics” in: Johanes Stripple and Harriet Bulkeley, eds. Governing the Climate. New Approaches to Rationality, Power and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stoica, Catalin Augustin; Mihailescu, Vintila (2012), „2012. Romania’s Winter of Discontent”, in Global Dialogue 3.1

Stoiciu, Victoria (2012), Austerity and Structural Reforms in Romania. International Policy Analysis, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

Stoiciu, Victoria (2016), „The Romanian Autumn 2013 and the Return of Politics. Protest Against Mining Projects and Fracking in Romania: Actors and Discourses”, in Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft, No. 01/2016.

Tilly, Charles; Tilly, Richard (1975) The Rebellious Century: 1830-1930, Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Touraine, Alain (1971), The Post Industrial Society, New York: Random House.

Volintiru, Clara (2012), Romania’s Recent Protests Have Become a Social Movement Calling for the Dignity of the People in the Face of an Unaccountable Government, [http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2012/03/20/romania-protests], 20 March 2012.

Wieviorka, Michel (2014) Alain Touraine and the concept of social movement, Intervention at ISA World Congress of Sociology, Yokohama, July 2014.

Wilson, Japhy; Swyngedouw, Erik (2014), The Post-Political and Its Discontents. Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Žižek, Slavoj (1991), For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor, London: Verso.

Žižek, Slavoj (1999), The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology, London: Verso.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-30

How to Cite

STOICIU, V. . (2017). ROMANIAN SOCIAL MOVEMENT: BETWEEN REPOLITICIZATION AND REINFORCEMENT OF THE STATUS-QUO (2012-2017). Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Studia Europaea, 62(3), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2017.3.08

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.