POLITICALLY EXPOSED PERSONS AND THE STRUCTURAL LIMITS OF ROMANIA’S AML/CFT FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Ana BĂDESCU PhD student in Political Science at the Faculty of European Studies, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca. Email: Ana.Badescu@ubbcluj.ro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2026.1.03

Keywords:

Anti-money laundering, Politically exposed persons, National Integrity Agency, MONEYVAL, Romania

Abstract

This paper examines key weaknesses in Romania’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) regulatory framework, with a particular focus on the detection and prosecution of money laundering involving politically exposed persons. The analysis begins with an original audit of the May 2025 list of important public functions maintained by Romania’s National Integrity Agency, which serves as the main reference tool for screening politically exposed persons. By cross-checking the list against the categories defined in the relevant legislation, the paper shows that this instrument is incomplete and therefore unreliable as a basis for effective compliance. The paper then identifies two additional structural vulnerabilities: the uneven supervisory coverage of obliged entities outside the banking sector and an enforcement system in which major cases frequently expire due to limitation periods or fail to be investigated at all. Taken together, these deficiencies suggest that Romania’s AML/CFT framework is not merely affected by isolated implementation gaps, but suffers from structural limitations that weaken its capacity to identify, investigate, and prosecute money laundering risks associated with politically exposed persons.

References

1. Agenția Națională de Integritate (ANI) (2025), “Lista funcțiilor publice importante”, 26 May.

2. Bag, Sauradeep (2024), “The Use of AI in Arresting Financial Crime”, ORF Issue Brief, no. 726, 1–12.

3. Biro, Atilla (2026), “Politicienii, ocoliți de analizele agenției care combate spălarea banilor," Context.ro.

4. Curtea Constituțională a României (2022), “Decizia nr. 358/2022” in Monitorul Oficial al României, partea I, nr. 565, 9 June.

5. Direcția Națională Anticorupție (DNA) (2025), “Raport de activitate 2025”, Bucharest: DNA, https://www.pna.ro.

6. Direcția Națională Anticorupție (DNA) (2024), “Raport de activitate 2024”, Bucharest: DNA, https://www.pna.ro.

7. Dumitrescu, Andrei; Rusu, Andrei (2025), “Romania”, in Brooker, Stephanie; Day, Kendall M. (eds.), International Comparative Legal Guides. Anti-Money Laundering Laws and Regulations 2025–2026, London: Global Legal Group, https://iclg.com/practice-areas/anti-money-laundering-laws-and-regulations/romania.

8. European Union (2024), “Regulation (EU) 2024/1620 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority”, OJ L, 19 June.

9. European Union (2024), “Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing”, OJ L, 19 June.

10. Greenberg, Theodore S.; Gray, Larissa; Schantz, Delphine; Gardner, Carolin; Latham, Michael (2010), “Politically Exposed Persons: Preventive Measures for the Banking Sector”, Washington, D.C.: World Bank / Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/611261468155103854/pdf/542500PUB0Expo101Official0Use0Only1.pdf.

10. Halliday, Terence C.; Levi, Michael; Reuter, Peter (2019), “Anti-Money Laundering: An Inquiry into a Disciplinary Transnational Legal Order” in UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law, vol. 4, no. 1, 1–25, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kv4t2kg.

11. Levi, Michael; Reuter, Peter (2025), “How Well Does the Money Laundering Control System Work?” in Crime and Justice, vol. 54, 1–60, DOI: 10.1086/735665.

12. MONEYVAL (2023), “Anti-money Laundering and Counter-terrorist Financing Measures – Romania”, Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation Report, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

13. MONEYVAL (2025), “Romania: 1st Enhanced Follow-up Report & Technical Compliance Re-Rating”, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

14. MONEYVAL (2024), “Anti-money Laundering and Counter-terrorist Financing Measures, Bulgaria: 1st Enhanced Follow-up Report & Technical Compliance Re-Rating”, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, May.

15. MONEYVAL (2021), “Anti-money Laundering and Counter-terrorist Financing Measures, Hungary: 4th Enhanced Follow-up Report & Technical Compliance Re-Rating”, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, May.

16. MONEYVAL (2026), “Anti-money Laundering and Counter-terrorist Financing Measures”, Slovak Republic: 4th Enhanced Follow-up Report, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

17. Oficiul Național de Prevenire și Combatere a Spălării Banilor (ONPCSB) (2025), “Raport de activitate 2024”, Bucharest: ONPCSB”.

18. Pol, Ronald F. (2020), “Anti-money Laundering: The World’s Least Effective Policy Experiment? Together, We Can Fix It” in Policy Design and Practice, vol. 3, no. 1, 73–94.

19. Romania (2019), “Law no. 129 of 11 July 2019 for preventing and combating money laundering and terrorist financing”.

20. Transparency International (2025), “Corruption Perceptions Index 2025”, Berlin: Transparency International.

21. World Justice Project (2025), “WJP Rule of Law Index 2025”, Washington D.C.: World Justice Project.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

BĂDESCU, A. (2026). POLITICALLY EXPOSED PERSONS AND THE STRUCTURAL LIMITS OF ROMANIA’S AML/CFT FRAMEWORK. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Studia Europaea, 71(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2026.1.03

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.