The Clash between the Utopian World of the Witches and the Dystopian Society of Humankind in “The Witch” and “Macbeth”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbdrama.2020.1.04Keywords:
The Witch, Thomas Middleton, Macbeth, William Shakespeare, Renaissance drama, Witchcraft, female sexuality, female utopian world.Abstract
Witchcraft has been present in cultural and intellectual history of various societies, and inescapably the representation of witchcraft and a witch figure have been one of the shared interests in numerous literary works. Particularly, witchcraft as a theme was very popular among the famous dramatists of the Renaissance period in England. For instance, both The Witch by Thomas Middleton and Macbeth by William Shakespeare have thick layer of witchcraft in their corpora. Accordingly, the present research is an attempt to highlight that, in contrast to the contemporary firm beliefs in and accusations against “witches,” these plays present the closed witch community as an almost a utopia through providing a stark contrast between the enigmatic yet egalitarian and free society of the witches and the hypocritical norms of the plays’ societies specifically related to sexuality and freedom of an individual.
References
Primary Sources:
Middleton, Thomas. The Witch. Edited by Elizabeth Schafer. London: A&C Black Limited, 1994.
Shakespeare, William, Macbeth. Edited by Nicholas Brooke. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1990.
Secondary Sources:
Aughterson, Kate. Renaissance Woman: Constructions of Femininity in England. London: Routledge, 1995.
Bever, Edward. “Witchcraft, Female Agression, and Power in the Early Modern Community.” Journal of Social History 35, no. 4 (2002): 955-88. doi: www.jstor.org/stable/3790618.
Brauner, Sigrid. Fearless Wives and Frightened Shrews: The Construction of the Witch in Early Modern Germany. Edited by Robert H. Brown. Massachusetts: Massachusetts UP, 1995.
Braunmuller, A. R. Introduction to Macbeth. Edited by A. R. Braunmuller, 1-93. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997.
Chakravorty, Swapan. Society and Politics in the Plays of Thomas Middleton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
Eagleton, Terry. “‘The witches are the heroines of the piece.’” In Macbeth: Contemporary Critical Essays, edited by Alan Sinfield, 46-52. Basingstoke & London: Macmillan Education, 1992.
Garrett, Julia M. “Witchcraft and Sexual Knowledge in Early Modern England.” Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 13, no. 1 (2013): 32-72. doi:10.1353/jem.2013.0002.
Greenblatt, Stephen. “Shakespeare Bewitched.” In William Shakespeare’s Macbeth: A Sourcebook, edited by Alexander Leggatt, 83-5. London & New York: Routledge, 2006.
Holmes, David. The Art of Thomas Middleton: A Critical Study. Oxford: Clarendon, 1970.
Johnstone, Nathan. “The Protestant Devil: The Experience of Temptation in Early Modern England.” Journal of British Studies 43, no. 2 (2004): 173-205. doi:10.1086/380949.
Karlsen, Carol. The Devil in the Shape of a Woman. New York: W. W. Norton, 1998.
Leggatt, Alexander. William Shakespeare’s Macbeth: A Sourcebook. Oxon: Routledge, 2006.
O’Connor, Marion. “The Witch.” Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works. Edited by Gary Taylor and John Lavagnino, 1124-28. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010.
Purkiss, Diane. The Witch in History: Early Modern and Twentieth-Century Representations. London: Routledge, 1996.
Rosenberg, Marvin, The Masks of Macbeth. Delaware: Delaware UP, 1993 [1978].
Schafer, Elizabeth. Introduction to The Witch, by Thomas Middleton, ix-xxix. London: A&C Black, 1994.
Schoenbaum, Samuel. “Middleton’s Tragicomedies.” Modern Philology 54, no. 1 (1956): 7-19. doi: www.jstor.org/stable/435153.
Sharpe, James. Instruments of Darkness. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania UP, 1997.
Stallybrass, Peter. “Macbeth and Witchcraft.” In Macbeth: Contemporary Critical Essays, edited by Alan Sinfield, 25-38. London: Macmillan Education, 1992.
Steinbach, Susie. Women in England 1760-1914: A Social History. London: Phoenix, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Dramatica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
