CFD PARTICLE MODEL AND OPTIMIZATION OF THE REACTION OF SULFIDIC PELLETS WITH HYDROGEN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbchem.2026.1.05Keywords:
copper sulfide, hydrogen desulfurization, CFD multilayer particle model, process optimizationAbstract
A dynamic 2D CFD multilayer particle model was developed and simulated using COMSOL Multiphysics 6.3 to study desulfurization of copper sulfide (Cu2S) with hydrogen (H2). The model solved interstitial velocity and pressure fields in the gas phase coupled to transiently resolved species transport in both gas and solid phases, incorporating reduction kinetics and dynamic pellet porosity change. After model validation with experimental data from literature, a constricted optimization study was carried out to identify optimal conditions necessary to maximize Cu2S conversion and H2 utilization. The optimization solutions (i.e., 100% H2 and 973 K) indicated that both high inlet mole fraction of H2 and temperature improved the objective function steadily, highlighting the trade-off between maximizing conversion and minimizing H2 slip. The current work can serve as a framework for reactor-scale simulations aimed at intensification and decarbonization of primary copper production.
References
1. International Energy Agency (IEA); Global Energy Review 2025, Paris, 2025
2. M. Crippa; D. Guizzardi; F. Pagani; M. Banja; M. Muntean; GHG emissions of all world countries – 2025 Report, Luxembourg, 2025
3. The Copper Mark (TCM); Decarbonizing the Copper Sector – Discussion Topics and Considerations for a 1.5 °C-aligned Trajectory and Target-setting Methodology, 2024
4. T. Watari; S. Northey; D. Giurco; S. Hata; R. Yokoi; K. Nansai; et al.; Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 179, 106118
5. International Copper Association (ICA); Copper — The Pathway to Net Zero, 2023
6. S&P Global; The Future of Copper: Will the Looming Supply Gap Short-Circuit the Energy Transition?, 2022
7. The Copper Mark (TCM); Decarbonizing the Copper Sector – Discussion Topics and Considerations for a 1.5 °C-aligned Trajectory and Target-setting Methodology, 2024
8. International Copper Study Group (ICSG); The World Copper Factbook 2025, 2025
9. International Finance Corporation (IFC); Net Zero Roadmap for Copper and Nickel Mining – Technical Report, 2023
10. M. Chen; D. Sukhomlinov; P. Taskinen; J. Hamuyuni; M. Tiljander; M. Lindgren; et al.; Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2025, 56, 1897–1913
11. M. Li; Y. Feng; X. Chen; Metals, 2024, 14, 840
12. A. A. Solghar; M. Abdolzadeh; Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 229, 11–24
13. S. Nirmal Kumar; B. Desai; V. Tathavadkar; Y. Patel; J. Patel; A. Singh; et al.; Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 2023, 132, 49–61
14. J. Zhou; J. Zhou; Z. Chen; Y. Mao; JOM, 2014, 66, 1629–1637
15. R. Urbaniak; B. Hadała; R. Stanik; J. Konstanty; A. Olejnik; International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2024, 108284
16. Z. Zhu; P. Zhou; Z. Chen; Z. Xiao; D. Wu; S. Kuang; Powder Technology, 2024, 443, 119898
17. M. E. Schlesinger; K. C. Sole; W. G. Davenport; G. R. F. Alvear Flores; Extractive Metallurgy of Copper, 6th ed.; Elsevier, 2021, 1–573
18. V. M. Sanchez-Corrales; J. A. Valera-Gonzalez; P. Flores-Perez; M. Perez-Tello; JOM, 2004, 56, 29–32
19. H. Y. Sohn; S. Won; Metallurgical Transactions B, 1985, 16, 831–839
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
