THE POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIAN NOVEL – NAVIGATING THE POLITICAL AND SOCIOGRAPHIC DIMENSIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2025.3.05Keywords:
(post)communist memory, nostalgia, transition, the post-communist Romanian novel, sociographic dimensions, world-systems theoryAbstract
The Post-Communist Romanian Novel – Navigating the Political and Sociographic Dimensions. The transition from communism to capitalism in Eastern Europe has been profoundly destabilising, reshaping economic, social, political, and ideological structures. This upheaval not only amplified the uneven development of the Soviet era but also replicated its harshness through neoliberal economic shock therapy, underscoring systemic inequalities between Western centres and Eastern peripheries. Drawing on Wallerstein’s world-systems theory, this relationship symbolises an unequal structural power relationship, with the periphery’s cultural and economic output subjugated to the demands of the centre (WReC, 2015). In literature, these dynamics have triggered a significant genre shift, particularly in the Romanian novel. The memorial and biographical forms increasingly dominate, marking a dissolution of traditional novelistic structures in favour of fragmented, introspective, and hybrid narratives. These forms align with broader trends of precariousness and cultural commodification, mirroring the destabilising effects of transition (Adriana Stan, 2020). Before Romania’s 2007 EU accession, post-communist novels primarily adopted a historiographical approach to document systemic trauma (Vasile Ernu, Lucian Dan Teodorovici, Dan Lungu). Post-accession, these works shifted to a commodified exploration of (post)communist memory, with narratives addressing economic disparities and minority identities (Tatiana Țîbuleac, Liliana Nechita, Adrian Schiop). This shift reflects the master-slave dynamic of centre-periphery relations, where the West’s exoticisation of communist experiences reinforces systemic inequalities. The dissolution of the Romanian novel into memorial and biographical forms symbolises a dual response: a critique of transitional instability and a capitulation to Western frameworks of cultural consumption.
REZUMAT. Romanul postcomunist în România – reconfigurări ale politicului și paliere sociografice. Tranziția de la comunism la capitalism în Europa de Est a fost profund destabilizatoare, privitor la impactarea structurilor economice, sociale, politice și ideologice. Această bulversare de tranziție sistemică și-a replicat duritatea prin terapia de șoc neoliberală, subliniind inegalitățile dintre centrele occidentale și periferiile estice. Pornind de la teoria sistemelor-lume a lui Wallerstein, această relație simbolizează un raport de putere structural inegală, arătând cum producția culturală și economică a periferiei e subjugată cerințelor centrului (WReC, 2015). În literatura română, aceste dinamici au declanșat schimbări semnificative, în special în roman. Resuscitarea biografismului și autenticismului domină din ce în ce mai mult, marcând o disoluție a structurilor romanești tradiționale în favoarea narațiunilor fragmentate, introspective și hibride. Aceste forme se aliniază tendințelor mai largi de precaritate și comodificare culturală, reflectând efectele destabilizatoare ale tranziției (Adriana Stan, 2020). Înainte de aderarea României la UE în 2007, romanele douămiiste au adoptat în principal o direcție istoriografică pentru a documenta trauma sistemică (Vasile Ernu, Lucian Dan Teodorovici, Dan Lungu). După aderare, poate fi observată o comodificare a memoriei (post)comuniste, fiind preferate narațiuni care abordează disparitățile economice și identitățile minoritare (Tatiana Țîbuleac, Liliana Nechita, Adrian Schiop). Această schimbare reflectă dinamica stăpân-sclav a relațiilor centru-periferie, în care exotizarea de către Occident a experiențelor comuniste consolidează inegalitățile sistemice.
Cuvinte-cheie: memoria (post)comunistă, nostalgia, tranziție, romanul românesc postcomunist, dimensiuni sociografice, teoria sistemelor-lume.
Article history: Received 15 June 2025; Revised 11 August 2025; Accepted 30 August 2025; Available online 24 September 2025; Available print 30 September 2025
References
***, Enciclopedia imaginariilor din România [The Encyclopedia of Imaginaries in Romania]. Tome I, edited by Corin Braga. 2020. Iași: Polirom.
***, Post-Communist Nostalgia. Edited by Maria Todorova & Zsuzsa Gile. 2010. New York Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Appel, Hilary, and Mitchell A. Orenstein. 2016. “Why Did Neoliberalism Triumph and Endure in the Post-Communist World?”. Comparative Politics, vol. 48, no. 3: 313–331. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24886207.
Babias, Marius. 2002. Ware Subjectivität. Eine Theorie-Novelle. München: Editions Metzel.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.
Baillargeon, Mércèdes. 2019. Le personnel est politique. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.
Ban, Cornel. 2014. Dependență și dezvoltare [Dependency and Development]. Cluj-Napoca: Tact.
Bâlici, Mihnea. 2024. “The Unhappy Marriage of Care and The Global Market: ‘Soft Backsliding’ in the Narratives of Two Romanian Badanti”. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory 10.1 (2024): 12-34.
https://doi.org/10.24193/mjcst.2024.17.02.
Bennett, Janet Marie. 2014. “Cultural Marginality: Identity Issues in Global Leadership Training”. Advances in Global Leadership: 269-292. October 7, 2014.
Boyer, Dominic. 2010. “Nostalgic Eastern Europe as Postimperial Mania.” In Post-Communist Nostalgia, edited by Maria Todorova and Zsuzsa Gille, 17-29. New York Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Buden, Boris. 2020. Transition to Nowhere. Art in History after 1989. Archive Books.
Ernu, Vasile. 2020. Născut în URSS [Born in USSR]. Iași: Polirom.
Fisher, Mark. 2009. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?. Winchester & Washington: O Books.
Gefen, Alexandre. 2017. Réparer le monde. Paris: Éditions Corti.
Goldiș, Alex. “Traumă și memorie în literatura română postdecembristă” [Trauma and Memory in Post-December Romanian Literature]. In Enciclopedia imaginariilor din România [The Encyclopedia of Imaginaries in Romania]. Tome I edited by Corin Braga, 377-392. Iași: Polirom.
Iovănel, Mihai. 2021. Istoria literaturii române contemporane (1990-2020) [The History of Contemporary Romanian Literature (1990–2020)]. Iași: Polirom.
Jameson, Fredric. 2002. The Political Unconscious. London & New York: Routledge Classics.
IDEM. 2008. “Imaginary and Symbolic in Lacan” (1978). In The Ideologies of Theory, 77-124. London & New York: Verso, 2008.
IDEM. 2008. The Ideologies Of Theory. London & New York: Verso.
IDEM. 2009. Valences of the Dialectic. London: Verso.
Johnson, Juliet. 2001. “Path Contingency in Postcommunist Transformations.” In Comparative Politics, vol. 33, no. 3: 253-274. https://doi.org/10.2307/422403.
Kornbluh, Anna. 2019. The Order of Forms. Realism, Formalism and Social Space. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lungu, Dan. 2012. Raiul găinilor [The Paradise of The Chickens]. Iași: Polirom.
Mironescu, Andreea. 2016. “Finding Bessarabian Literature on the Maps of Eastern Europe. Notes on a Case of Triangular Cultural Transfer”. Transilvania, no. 12: 19-24. https://revistatransilvania.ro/finding-bessarabian-literature-on-the-maps-of-eastern-europe-notes-on-a-case-of-triangular-cultural-transfer/.
Murgescu, Bogdan. România și Europa. Acumularea decalajelor economice (1500-2010) [Romania and Europe. The Accumulation of Economic Gaps (1500-2010)]. Iași: Polirom.
Nechita, Liliana. 2019. Cireșe amare [Bitter Cherries]. București: Humanitas.
Pasti, Vladimir. 2006. Noul capitalism românesc [The New Romanian Capitalism]. Iași: Polirom.
Poenaru, Florin. 2017. Locuri comune. Clasă, anticomunism, stânga [Commonplaces: Class, Anti-Communism, and the Left]. Cluj-Napoca: Tact.
Pop-Eleches, Grigore and Joshua A. Tucker. 2011. “Communism’s Shadow: Postcommunist Legacies, Values, and Behavior.” In Comparative Politics, vol. 43, no. 4: 379-399. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23040635.
Rancière, Jacques. 2000. Le partage du sensible. Paris: La Fabrique éditions.
Schiop, Adrian. 2017. Soldații. Poveste din Ferentari [Soldiers: A Story from Ferentari]. Iași: Polirom.
Stan, Adriana. 2020. “Autenticitate și ideologii în literatura douămiistă” [Authenticity and Ideologies in The Literary of The 2000s]. Transilvania, no. 8: 1-6. https://revistatransilvania.ro/autenticitate-si-ideologii-in-literatura-douamiista/.
IDEM. 2021. “Post-Socialist Realism. Authenticity and Political Conscience in the Romanian Literature of the 2000s”. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, April 9, 2021: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2021.1908946.
Teodorovici, Lucian Dan. 2020. Circul nostru vă prezintă: [Our Circus presents:]. Iași: Polirom.
Todorova, Maria. 2010. “Introduction: From Utopia to Propaganda and Back.” In Post-Communist Nostalgia, edited by Maria Todorova & Zsuzsa Gile, 1-17. New York Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2010.
Țîbuleac, Tatiana. 2022. Grădina de sticlă [The Glass Garden]. București: Cartier Popular.
Vancea, Mihaela. 2017. “Proza douămiistă – detabuizarea cuplului homosexual” [The Prose of the Generation 2000. The Detabooization of the Homosexual Couple]. Transilvania, no. 6: 25-31. https://revistatransilvania.ro/proza-douamiista-detabuizarea-cuplului-homosexual/.
Vîrban, Iulia-Maria. 2024. “Literatura română și basarabeană în dialog interperiferic: circulația modelului literar basarabean” [Romanian and Bessarabian Literature in Interperipheral Dialog: The Circulation of the Bessarabian Literary Model]. Transilvania, no. 6-7: 110-120.
Wachtel, Andrew Baruch. 2006. Remaining Relevant After Communism. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
WReC. 2015. Combined and Uneven Development. Towards a New Theory of World-Literature. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.