IDEOLOGIZED IDENTITIES IN THE ROMANIAN E-NEWS. A CULTURAL SOCIOLINGUISTIC QUERY OF CONVERGED MEDIA TEXTS ON THE 2022 RUSSIA-UKRAINE CONFLICT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2022.4.04Keywords:
Cultural Sociolinguistics, Ethnography of Netspeak, ideologized identity, digital cultural practices, textual interpretation, e-Press, Social Networked SitesAbstract
Ideologized Identities in the Romanian e-News. A Cultural Sociolinguistic Query of Converged Media Texts on the 2022 Russia-Ukraine Conflict. The design for this paper is to provide a qualitative analysis of how positioning towards the two parties directly involved in the 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict has been the catalyst of the textual morphing of two ideologized identities in some of the Romanian e-Press. The focus was on the locus of convergence of two types of mediated texts: the production of professional press editors and journalists, and of Social Networked Sites users and prosumers. With this intent, the Romanian HotNews.ro website was scrutinized, and a number of e-news items were singled out thematically and structurally. The presumption is that the mediation process has been conducive to foregrounding two ballpark antithetic identities as underpinned by correspondent ideologies. An interdisciplinary perspective was opted for, one that joins Cultural Sociolinguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis (Agha 2007; Androutsopoulous 2006; Blommaert 2017; Herring 2013; Silverstein 2004; Thurlow 2017; Wodak 2022) with the Ethnography of Netspeak (Kozinets 2010; Markham 2016, 2020; Zappavigna 2011) and focuses on collective identities in order to diagnose how the mediated text, as part of the semiotic architecture of the said e-Press inputs, pairs up antithetic ideology-determined identities in times of crisis.
Article history: Received 15 August 2022; Revised 26 October 2022; Accepted 8 November 2022;
Available online 20 December 2022; Available print 30 December 2022.
REZUMAT. Identități ideologizante în presa electronică din România. O investigație de factură sociolingvistică și culturală a unor texte mediatice convergente pe tema conflictului ruso-ucrainean din 2022. Intenția lucrării de față este de a furniza o analiză calitativă a modului în care poziționarea față de cele două părți direct implicate în conflictul ruso-ucranean a catalizat alcătuirea în textele unei părți a presei electronice românești a două identități ideologizante. Accentul cade asupra locului de convergență a două tipuri de texte mediatice, și anume produsele editorilor și jurnaliștilor de presă și cele ale utilizatorilor și prozumatorilor de pe siturile de socializare în rețea. S-au identificat din punct de vedere tematic și structural un număr de articole de știri electronice de pe platforma românească de știri HotNews.ro. S-a presupus că procesul de mediatizare facilitează evidențierea, în mare, a două identități antitetice, întemeiate pe ideologiile aferente. S-a optat pentru utilizarea unei perspective intersdisciplinare, ce reunește Sociolingvistica culturală și Analiza critică a discursului (Agha 2007; Androutsopoulous 2006; Blommaert 2017; Herring 2013; Thurlow 2017; Silverstein 2004; Wodak 2022) și Etnografia dialogului pe Internet (Kozinets 2010; Markham 2016, 2020; Zappavigna 2011) cu accent pe identitățile colective, cu scopul de a diagnostica modul în care textul mediatic, parte a arhitecturii semiotice a tipului de presă menționat, alătură identități antitetice în baza curentului ideologic căruia îi subscriu în momente de criză.
Cuvinte-cheie: Sociolingvistică culturală, Etnografia dialogului pe Internet, identitate ideologizantă, practici culturale digitale, interpretare de text, presă electronică, situri ale rețelelor de socializare
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2006. “Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Sociolinguistics. 10(4). 419-38.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2008. “Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography.” Language@Internet. 5, article 8. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2013. Participatory Culture and Metalinguistic Discourse German Dialects on YouTube. Retrieved from
Androutsopoulos, Jannis and Jana Tereick. 2016. "YouTube Language and Discourse Practices in Participatory Culture.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication edited by Georgakopoulou, Alexandra and Spilioti Tereza. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 354-371.
Blommaert, Jan. 2018. Durkheim and the Internet: Sociolinguistics and the Sociological Imagination. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Accessed June 22, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350055223
Crystal, David. 2011. Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. New York: Routledge.
Danet, Brenda and Susan C Herring. 2007. The Multilingual Internet. Language, Culture, and Communication Online. Oxford University Press.
Herring, Susan. 2013. “Discourse in Web 2.0: familiar, reconfigured, and emergent.” In Discourse 2.0. Language and New Media edited by Deborah Tannen and Anna Marie Trester. Georgetown University Press, 1-25.
Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York and London: New York University Press.
Jenkins, Richard. 2014. Social Identity. (4th ed.). Routledge.
Joseph, John E. 2004. Language and Identity. National, Ethnic, Religious. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kozinets, Robert. 2010. Netnography. Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage.
Markham, Annette. 2016. Ethnography in the Digital Internet Era. From fields to flows, from description to interventions. Accessed August 5, 2022, ttps://www.academia.edu/20828448/Ethnography_in_the_Digital_Internet_Era_final_draft_jan_20_2016_published_2017.
Markham, Annette. 2020. Qualitative Inquiry in the Digital Era. Manuscript submitted for publication. August 5, 2022. https://www.academia.edu/43155021/QUALITATIVE_RESEARCH_IN_THE_DIGITAL_AGE.
Martin, Allan. 2008. “Digital Literacy and the ‘Digital Society’.” In Digital Literacies. Concepts. Policies and Practices, edited by Colin Lankshear and Michele Knobel, 151-176. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. London and New York: McGraw-Hill. Accessed August 5, 2022,
https://designopendata.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/understanding-media-mcluhan.pdf.
Papacharissi, Zizi. (ed.). 2011. Networked Self. Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Networked Sites. New York and London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Silverstein, Michael. 2004. “‘Cultural’ concepts and the language-culture nexus.” Current Anthropology 45, 621–652.
Tannen, Deborah, and Anna Marie Trester. 2013. Discourse 2.0. Language and New Media. Georgetown University Press, 1-26.
Thurlow, Crispin. 2017. “Digital discourse: Locating language in new/social media.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, edited by J. Burgess, T. Poell & A. Marwick. New York: Sage.
Van Dijk, Teun. 2006. The Network Society. Social Aspects of the New Media. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Wodak, Ruth. 2022. “Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual, edited by J. Verschueren & J. Östman. 2nd ed., vol. 24, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 426-443. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.cri1.
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and social media [how we use language to create affiliation on the web]. New York, London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2.
Webography:
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
