NATIONAL INDUSTRY 4.0 PLATFORMS IN THE VISEGRAD 4 COUNTRIES – A COMPARISON WITH THE FRONTRUNNER DIGITAL ECONOMIES IN EUROPE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/subboec-2021-0012Keywords:
Visegrad Four; digital transformation; digitalization; Industry 4.0Abstract
Based on the international digitization indexes, the development level of digitalization in the Visegrad Four (V4) countries is similar in many respects. The status of the recent digital developments is comparable in results and in deficits also. These economies have similar inescapable paths in the past and further development opportunities in the future. The economic success of these four countries greatly depends on the transformation of their economic structures, mainly by utilizing digitalization. This study compares the approaches, activities and initiatives of the national Industry 4.0 platforms of the V4 countries that promote and support the digital transformation on the national strategic level. The study also highlights the results that have already been achieved by the members of the European Quartet. These four countries have reached good results in digital infrastructure investments. Meanwhile, they are left behind in skillsets, education and adoption of companies, regarding their digital transformation. Beside the direct comparison of the four Industry 4.0 platforms, the study extends the research to three of the Frontrunner countries of the EU in digitalization, namely to Austria, Germany, Sweden, to understand the best practices they use and actions they take regarding the digitalization. The paper formulates guidelines for defining competitive policies and techniques for accelerating the digitalization of the V4 economies. The study lists the pain points of the V4 digitalization and makes suggestions on recoveries, mainly on the field of the potential involvement of companies and the financing of the national I40 platforms.
JEL classification: O11, O14, O23, O38, O33, D83.
References
Adamek P. (2018) A Research Agenda of Industry 4.0 from the Cech Perspective. Intech, 21-39
Blanchet M., Rinn T., Von Thaden G., de Thieulloy F. (2014) Industry 4.0: The new industrial revolution - How Europe will Succeed. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, Think Act, 3.
Buica M. (2016) New Industrial Policy or New Industrial Revolution for Increasing European Competitiveness? Journal of Business Economics and Information Technology, 2, 3, 8-19
CENFIM (2018) Map of initiatives supporting the implementation of Industry Digitalization in across the EU, European Committee
Csíki O., Horváth R., Szász L. (2019) A Study of Regional-Level Location Factors of Car Manufacturing Companies in the EU. Acta Oeconomica, Vol. 69 (S2), 13-39
DESI (2018a) Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), 2018 Country Report Czech Republic, Europeran Commission
EC (2017) DIGITISING EUROPEAN INDUSTRY, Europeran Commission
EC (2018b) Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2018 Country Report Poland, Europeran Commission
EC (2019a) Monitoring Progress in National Initiatives on Digitalising Industry, Country report: Slovakia, Europeran Commission, VVA, VIK Consult
EC (2019b), Monitoring Progress in National Initiatives on Digitalising Industry, Country report: Poland, European Commission, VVA, VIK Consult
EC (2019c) Monitoring Progress in National Initiatives on Digitalising Industry, Country report: Czech Republic, European Commission, VVA, VIK Consult
EC (2019d) Monitoring Progress in National Initiatives on Digitalising Industry, Country report: Hungary, European Commission, VVA, VIK Consult
EC (2020a) Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), 2020 Slovakia, Eureopean Commission
EC (2020c) Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2020 Czech Republic, European Commission
EC (2020d) Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2020 Hungary, European Commission
Geissbauer R., Vedso J., Schrauf S. (2016) Industry 4.0: Building the Digital Enterprise. - Global Industry 4.0 Survey, PWC
Grencíková A., Kordoš M., Berkovic V. (2020) The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Jobs Creation within the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and Family Businesses in Slovakia. Administratrive Sciences, 2020, 10, 71; 1-20
Grzyb K. (2019) Industry 4.0 Market in Poland from the International Perspective. Hradec Economic Days Vol. 9(1), 2019 February 5–6, 2019 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
Hoff P. (2016) Industry 4.0 – Challenge for the F&B industry in Greece, advantage or competitive disadvantage. Roland Berger, Greece
Ignatov A. (2019) Institutional efficiency, entrepreneurship, and the premises of economic development in the Eastern European Countries. Studia Universitas Babes-Bolyai Oeconomica, Volume 64, Issue 2, 2019, 12-32
Johanesová V., Stupavská L., Vaňová J., Čambál M. (2019)
Linking Industry 4.0 and Slovak Republic. 30th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent manufacturing and automation, B. Katalinic (Ed.), DAAAM International, Vienna, Austria, 1122-1130
Kagermann H., Anderl R., Gausemeier J., Schuh G. Wahlster W. (2016) Industrie 4.0 in a Global Context - Strategies for Cooperating with International Partners. acatech STUDY, Munich, Germany
Kagermann H., Wahlster W., Helbig J. (2013) Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Secretariat of the Platform Industrie 4.0, Germany
Klitou D., Conrads J., Rasmussen M., Probst L., Pedersen B. (2017c) Key lessons from national industry 4.0 policy initiatives in Europe. Digital Transformation Monitor, PwC, CARSA, European Commission, EU
Klitou D., Conrads J., Rasmussen M., Probst L., Pedersen B., Lefebvre V. (2017a) Czech Republic: Průmysl 4.0. Digital Transformation Monitor (DTM), European Commission, Directorate-General Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs; Directorate F: Innovation and Advanced Manufacturing; Unit F/3 KETs, Digital Manufacturing and Interoperability
Klitou D., Conrads J., Rasmussen M., Probst L., Pedersen B., Lefebvre V. (2017b) Poland: “Initiative for Polish Industry 4.0 – The Future Industry Platform”. Digital Transformation Monitor (DTM), European Commission, Directorate-General Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs; Directorate F: Innovation and Advanced Manufacturing; Unit F/3 KETs, Digital Manufacturing and Interoperability
Klitou D., Conrads J., Rasmussen M., Probst L., Pedersen B., Lefebvre, V. (2018a) Hungary: “IPAR 4.0 National Technology Platform”. Digital Transformation Monitor (DTM), European Commission, Directorate-General Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs; Directorate F: Innovation and Advanced Manufacturing; Unit F/3 KETs, Digital Manufacturing and Interoperability
Klitou D., Conrads J., Rasmussen M., Probst L., Pedersen B., Lefebvre, V. (2018b) Slovakia: Smart Industry. Digital Transformation Monitor (DTM), European Commission, Directorate-General Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs; Directorate F: Innovation and Advanced Manufacturing; Unit F/3 KETs, Digital Manufacturing and Interoperability
Losonci D., Takács O., Demeter K. (2019) Az ipar 4.0 hatásainak nyomában – a magyarországi járműipar elemzése. Közgazdasági Szemle, LXVI. évf., 2019. február, 185-218
Mattauch W. (2017) Digitising European Industries -Member States Profile: Poland, European Committee
Moroz M. (2017) The level of development of digital economy in Poland and selected European Countries: a comparative analysis. Foundations of Management, Vol. 9 (2017), 175-190
Morrar R., Arman H., Mousa S. (2017) The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review November 2017 (Volume 7, Issue 11) 11-20
Nick G., Gallina V., Szaller Á., Várgedő T., Schumacher A. (2019a) Industry 4.0 in Germany, Austria and Hungary: interpretation, strategies and readiness models. 16th IMEKO TC10 Conference, Berlin, Germany, on September 3-4, 2019
Nick G., Gyimesi Á., Radács E. (2019b) Az Ipar 4.0 keretrendszerének bemutatása három élenjáró európai ország – Németország, Svédország és Ausztria – stratégiái alapján. Tér-Gazdaság-Ember, 2019 VII. 1-2, 31-52
Nick G., Váncza J., Várgedő T. (2017) AZ IPAR 4.0 Nemzeti Technológiaiplatform - Kérdőív Projekt. Ipar 4.0 Nemzeti Technológiai Platform Szövetség
Novak J., Purta M., Marciniak T., Ignatowicz K., Rozenbaum K., Yearwood K., Svoboda D., Skalsky M., Sarkanova H. (2018a) The Rise of Digital Challenges - Perspecitve on Slovakia. McKinsey & Company
Novak J., Purta M., Marciniak T., Ignatowicz K., Rozenbaum K., Yearwood K.; Svoboda D., Karalokev T., Skalsky M. (2018b) The Rise of Digital Challenges - Perspecitve on Czech Republic. McKinsey & Company
Novak J., Purta M., Marciniak T., Ignatowicz K., Rozenbaum K., Yearwood K. (2018c) The Rise of Digital Challenges - Perspecitve on Poland. McKinsey & Company
Papula J., Kohnová L., Papulová Z., Suchoba M. (2019) Industry 4.0: Preparation of Slovak Companies, the Comparative Study. Smart Technology Trends in Industrial and Business Management., Springer, 103-114
Probst L., Pedersen B., Lonkeu O-K., Martinez-Diaz C., Novelle Araujo L., Klitou, D., Conrads J., Rasmussen M. (2017) Evidence of positive outcomes and current opportunities for EU businesses. Digital Transformation Scoreboard, European Commission, European Union
Ulewicz R., Novy F. Sethanan K. (2019) The challenges of industry 4.0 for small and medium enterprises in Poland and Slokvakia. Quality Production Improvement, Volume 1, issue 1, 147-154
Vrchota J., Pech M. (2019) Readiness of Enterprises in Czech Republic to Implement Industry 4.0: Index of Industry 4.0. Applied Sciences 2019, 9, 1-25
Weresa M. A., Kowalski A. M. (2019) Poland competitiveness report 2019., International Competitiveness in the Context of Development of Industry 4.0., Collegium of World Economy, The World Economy Research Institute’s International Seminar of Manufacturing and Services and International Competitiveness: National and Regional Perspectives, 11 October 2019, Warsaw, Poland
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.