CULTURAL ASPECTS OF NEGOTIATION BETWEEN ISRAEL AND EGYPT LEADING TO CAMP DAVID ACCORDS 1979
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2025.2.01Keywords:
Interculturalism, Israel–Egypt relations, Camp David Accords, diplomacy, political leadership, religion, communication, Middle East negotiations, Abraham Accords, cultural identityAbstract
This article explores the cultural, intercultural, and interpersonal dimensions that shaped the negotiations between Israel and Egypt leading to the 1979 Camp David Accords. Drawing on theoretical frameworks in interculturalism, leadership studies, communication theory, and negotiation analysis, as well as firsthand accounts from actors involved, this study examines how cultural perceptions, religious symbolism, linguistic practices, and interpersonal relationships influenced the peace process. The study argues that while cultural and religious factors were not the direct causes of peace, they played an important enabling role, facilitating dialogue, reducing psychological distance, and helping negotiators humanize one another. Through a thematic and interpretive approach, the article situates the peace process within broader developments in Middle Eastern intercultural dynamics, including the later trajectory culminating in the Abraham Accords. It concludes that the Israel–Egypt peace negotiations demonstrate how intercultural competence, leadership vision, and personal diplomacy can reshape entrenched conflicts, creating new paradigms of regional coexistence.
References
1. Burns, J.M., (1978) Leadership, New York: Harper & Row
2. Byram, M., (1997) Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters
3. Carter, J., (1995) Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President, Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press (reprinted edition)
4. Dayan, M. (1981) Breakthrough: A Personal Account of the Egypt-Israel Peace Negotiations, New York: Alfred A. Knopf
5. Jervis, R., (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press
6. Hofstede, G., (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Los Angeles: SAGE
7. Kahenman, D., & Tversky, A., (1979) “Prospect theory: and analysis of decision under risk.” Econometrica 47:2, pp. 263-291
8. Gudykunst, W.B., (2004) Theorizing About Intercultural Communication. Los Angeles: SAGE
9. Nye Jr., J.S., (2005) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs
10. Quandt, W.B., (1986) Camp David: Peacemaking and Politics. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution
11. Said, E., (1978) Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books
12. Schelling, T., (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
13. Trompenaars, F., (1998) Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. New York: McGraw-Hill
14. Weber, M., (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Los Angeles: The Free Press
15. Karataş, I., & Uslu, N., (2022) “The Abraham Accords: can interculturalism solve grave conflicts of the Middle East?” Journal of Ecumenical Studies 57:2, pp. 297-315
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Studia Europaea

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
