HOW TO LOOK AT NEOLIBERALISM. REVISITING ADORNO'S SOCIAL PHYSIOGNOMY

Authors

  • Ciprian BOGDAN PhD Lecturer, Department of International Relations and German Studies, Faculty of European Studies, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: bogdanciprian@euro.ubbcluj.ro. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6789-7196

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2017.3.10

Keywords:

ideology, critique of ideology, negation of negation, neoliberalism

Abstract

Against the widespread view that Adorno remains stuck in an antiquated way of approaching ideology as expression of social totality, the present article tries to recuperate Adorno’s dialectical legacy in the context of contemporary neoliberalism. One central point made by Adorno - though usually missed by interpreters - is that ideology operates according to the Hegelian “negation of negation”. We believe that this basic insight can be applied not only to liberal capitalism (19th century) and monopoly capitalism (20th century), but also to neoliberalism, thus shedding a new light even on contemporary phenomena like fake news or the proliferation of dystopian political scenarios as in the case of Trump or Brexit campaigns.

References

Adorno, Theodor W. (1976), “Introduction”, in Theodor W. Adorno, Hans Albert, Ralf Dahrendorf, Jürgen Habermas, Harald Pilot, Karl R. Popper (eds.), The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, London and Edinburgh: Heinemann.

Adorno, Theodor W. (2002), Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Adorno, Theodor W. (1993), Hegel. Three Studies, Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.

Adorno, Theodor W. (1997) Kulturkritik und Gesellschaft I. Ohne Leitbild. Gesammelte Schriften 10. 1, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Adorno, Theodor W. (2004), Negative Dialectics, London and New York: Routledge.

Adorno, Theodor W. (1997), Soziologische Schriften I. Gesammelte Schriften 8, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Adorno, Theodor W. (1973), The Jargon of Authenticity, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Beck, Ulrich (1992), Risk Society – Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.

Benhabib, Seyla (1994), “The Critique of Instrumental Reason”, in Slavoj Žižek (ed.), Mapping Ideology, London and New York: Verso.

Blyth, Mark (2013), Austerity. The History of a Dangerous Idea, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Bogdan, Ciprian (2015), “Politics but not too much. Neoliberalism as infra-ideology”, in Sergiu Mişcoiu, Valentin Naumescu (eds.), What is Left From the Left-Right Cleavage? A Comparative Perspective, Bucureşti: Editura Institutului de Ştiinţe Politice şi Relaţii Internaţionale.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1998), Acts of Resistance. Against the New Myths of our Time, Cambridge, Oxford: Polity Press.

“Corporate tax avoidance by multinational firms”, in Library of the European Parliament, 23/09/2013, available at [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/bibliotheque/briefing/2013/130574/LDM_BRI%282013%29130574_REV1_EN.pdf].

Foucault, Michel (2008), The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Habermas, Jürgen (1987), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures, Cambridge and Oxford: Polity Press.

Hall, Stuart, O'Shea, Alan, Common-Sense Neoliberalism, [https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/sites/default/files/s55_02hall_oshea.pdf].

Jay, Martin, Marxism and Totality. The Adventures of a Concept from Lukacs to Habermas (1984), Berkeley: University of California Press.

Jütten, Timo, “Habermas and Markets”, Constellations, vol. 20, 4, 2013, available at [http://repository.essex.ac.uk/10834/1/Habermas_and_Markets_-_Academia-libre.pdf].

Lyotard, Jean-François (1974), “Adorno as the Devil”, Telos, 19, Spring.

Postone, Moishe (2009), History and Heteronomy. Critical Essays, Tokyo: UTCP Booklet 12.

Rorty, Richard (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Buck-Morss, Susan (1977), The Origin of Negative Dialectics. Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, and the Frankfurt Institute, New York and London: The Free Press.

Wellmer, Albrecht (1985), Zur Dialektik von Moderne und Postmoderne. Vernunftkritik nach Adorno, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Wilding, Adrian (2009), “Pied Pipers and Polymaths: Adorno's Critique of Praxisism”, in John Holloway, Fernando Matamoros and Sergio Tischler (eds.), Negativity and Revolution. Adorno and Political Activism, London: Pluto Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-30

How to Cite

BOGDAN, C. . (2017). HOW TO LOOK AT NEOLIBERALISM. REVISITING ADORNO’S SOCIAL PHYSIOGNOMY. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Studia Europaea, 62(3), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2017.3.10

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.