QU’EST-CE QUE LE NÉO-POPULISME? QUELQUES EXPLIQUATIONS FACTUELLES POUR UN ÉCLAIRCISSEMENT THÉORIQUE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2017.3.05Keywords:
people, populism, neopopulism, elites, representationAbstract
What is Neo-Populism? Factual Contributions for Theoretical Advancements. In defining the specificity of neo-populism, numerous theoretical attempts have been leading to rather unsatisfactory results. In this article, instead of trying to abstractly define neo-populism, by using a wide range of examples, I will propose a series of empirical delineations that will contribute to a theoretical clarification of the specificity of neo-populism in relation to its mother-concept – populism.
References
Ackeret, Matthias (2007), Le principe Blocher : manuel de direction, Schaffhouse: Meier.
Albertazzi, Daniele; O’Donnell, Duncan (2008), « Introduction » in Daniele Albertazzi et Duncan O’Donnell (dir.), Twenty-first Century Populism. The Spectre of Western European Democracy, Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan.
Arditi, Benjamin, « Populism as an Internal Periphery of Democratic Politics » in Francisco Panizza (dir.) (2005), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, London: Verso.
Betz, Hans-Georg; Immerfall, Steffan (dir.) (1998), The New Politics of the Right. Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies, Houndmilss, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Braun, Herbert (1985), The Assassination of Gaitán : Public Life and Urban Violence in Colombia, Madison, Wisconsin.
Gerber, Elisabeth R. (1999), The Populist Paradox. Interest Group Influence and the Paradox of Direct Legislation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Greskovits, Béla (1998), The Political Economy of Protest and Patience: East European and Latin American Transformations Compared, Budapest: CEU Press.
Hermet, Guy (2001), Les populismes dans le monde contemporain, Paris: Fayard.
Hermet, Guy (2007), L’hiver de la démocratie ou le nouveau régime, Paris: Armand Colin.
Ionescu, Ghiţă (1969), « Eastern Europe », in Ghiţă Ionescu, Ernst Gellner (dir.), Populism, Its Meanings and National Characteristics, London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
Laclau, Ernesto (2008), La raison populiste, Paris: Seuil.
Loewenstein, Karl (1973), Brazil Under Vargas, New York: Russell & Russell.
Mişcoiu, Sergiu (2005), Le Front National et ses répercussions sur l’échiquier politique français, Cluj-Napoca: Efes.
Mişcoiu, Sergiu (2008), « Citoyenneté et identité nationale: les limites du retour gauche-droite en France lors de l’élection présidentielle de 2007 » dans Sergiu Mişcoiu, Chantal Delsol, Bertrand Alliot (dir.), Identités politiques et dynamiques partisanes en France, Cluj: Efes.
Mişcoiu, Sergiu (2010), « Între retorica consensului şi practica rupturii. Efectele oscilaţiilor strategice asupra percepţiei publice faţă de Parlamentul României » in Sergiu Gherghina (coord.), Cine decide? Partide, reprezentanţi şi politici în Parlamentul României şi cel European, Iaşi: Institutul European.
Mişcoiu, Sergiu; Crăciun, Oana; Colopelnic, Nicoleta (2008), Radicalism, Populism, Interventionism. Three Approaches Based on Discourse Theory, Cluj: Efes.
Mişcoiu, Sergiu (2010), « Introducere » in Sergiu Gherghina, Sergiu Mişcoiu (dir.), Partide şi personalităţi populiste în România post-comunistă, Iaşi: Institutul European.
Mudde, Cas (2002), « In the Name of the Peasantry, the Proletariat, and the People: Populisms in Eastern Europe » in Yves Mény, Yves Surel (dir.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musso, Pierre (2005), « Le phénomène Berlusconi : ni populisme ni vidéocratie, mais néo-politique » in Hermès, no 42.
Pazos, Luis (1988), O rezinho populista, Sao Paolo: Ed. Inconfidentes.
Pilsudski, Joseph (1935), Du révolutionnaire au chef d’Etat: 1893-1935. Pages choisies des dix volumes des « Œuvres, discours, ordres », Paris: Société française d’éditions littéraires et techniques
Rasmussen, Scott; Schoen, Doug (2010), Mad As Hell: How the Tea Party Movement Is Fundamentally Remaking Our Two-Party System, New York: Harper.
Shafir, Michael (2008), « From Historical to 'Dialectical' Populism: The Case of Post-Communist Romania » in Canadian Slavonic Papers, vol. 50, no 3-4.
Taguieff, Pierre-André (2007), L’illusion populiste. Essai sur les démagogies à l’ère démocratique, Paris: Champs, Flammarion.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Europaea
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
