MEN’S 100-METER FREESTYLE: A TEMPORAL AND BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Marcel RĂSĂDEAN Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, West University, Timișoara, Romania. Corresponding author: marcel.rasadean@e-uvt.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7836-6297
  • Bianca BĂLAȘ Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, West University, Timișoara, Romania
  • Dan Ionuț PÎRJOL Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, West University, Timișoara, Romania https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6250-8227

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.70.sp.iss.2.48

Keywords:

competitive swimming, elite athletes, 100-meter freestyle, comparative analysis

Abstract

Men’s 100-meter freestyle event represents a benchmark discipline in competitive swimming, marked by biomechanical complexity, intense physiological demands, and distinctive strategic dynamics. With a longstanding tradition in international competitions, this event requires an optimal combination of speed, power, technique, and recovery capacity. The main objective of this research was to analyze the biomechanical and temporal parameters of the world’s top swimmers in the 100-meter freestyle, in order to identify execution patterns that can contribute to optimizing performance. The study involved a comparative analysis of twelve elite athletes, examining indicators such as split times across the two 50-meter segments, number of stroke cycles, and stroke amplitude. Data were collected from official international competition sources and interpreted through the lens of applied biomechanics. Findings revealed that the highest-performing athletes exhibit minimal temporal and biomechanical amplitude differences between race segments. Pan Zhanle set a new world record (46.40 s), characterized by a well-balanced start and consistent speed maintenance. The analysis of stroke count highlighted the swimmers’ ability to sustain technical stability despite increased metabolic load. The research confirms the hypothesis that top performance in the 100-meter freestyle is decisively influenced by biomechanical balance and strategic effort distribution. Effective strategies are associated with minimal variation in stroke frequency and split times—critical factors in achieving elite-level results. This study provides a relevant analytical framework for coaches and high-performance swimmers, contributing to the development of evidence-based training methodologies in competitive swimming.

References

Cetin, E., Akdağ, E., & Aktop, A. (2017). Comparison of some kinematic parameters in the 100 m freestyle performances of different age groups. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 10, 92–98. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.06.10

Colwin, C. (2002). Breakthrough swimming. Human Kinetics.

López-Plaza, D., Morán-Navarro, R., Sillero-Quintana, M., & González-Badillo, J. J. (2024). Stroke steadiness as a determinant factor of performance in 100 m freestyle in young swimmers. Sports, 12(4), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12040107

Maglischo, E. W. (2003). Swimming fastest. Human Kinetics.

Morais, J. E., Silva, A. J., Barbosa, T. M., & Marinho, D. A. (2022). Race level comparison and variability analysis of 100 m freestyle sprinters competing in the 2019 European Championships. Journal of Human Kinetics, 82(1), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0067

Morais, J. E., Marinho, D. A., Barbosa, T. M., & Forte, P. (2023). Stroke frequency–stroke length combinations of junior and senior swimmers in 50 m freestyle. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 22(1), 156–162. https://www.jssm.org/volume22/iss1/cap/jssm-22-156.pdf

MySwimSplits. (n.d.). Top 100 m freestyle swim analysis. Retrieved on August 17, 2025, from https://myswimsplits.com/top-100m-freestyle-swim-analysis/

World Aquatics. (n.d.). Athletes and results. Retrieved on August 15, 2025, from https://www.worldaquatics.com/.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

How to Cite

RĂSĂDEAN, M., BĂLAȘ, B., & PÎRJOL, D. I. (2025). MEN’S 100-METER FREESTYLE: A TEMPORAL AND BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS. Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Educatio Artis Gymnasticae, 70(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.70.sp.iss.2.48

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.