INTEGRATING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN OPTIMIZING PHYSICAL TRAINING FOR U18 HANDBALL PLAYERS

Authors

  • Roxana-Nicoleta POPA University of Craiova, Doctoral School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Alexandru Ioan Cuza Street, no. 13, 200585 Craiova, Romania. *Corresponding author: roxananicoletaa1996@gmail.com
  • Alex-Paul SECIU University of Craiova, Doctoral School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Alexandru Ioan Cuza Street, no. 13, 200585 Craiova, Romania.
  • Virgil ENE-VOICULESCU Naval Tactics and Armament Department, Faculty of Marine Engineering, Mircea cel Batran Naval Academy, 900218 Constanta, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1451-207X
  • Carmen ENE-VOICULESCU Ovidius University of Constanta, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Cpt. Av. Al. Şerbănescu Street, no. 1, 900470 Constanta, Romania. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1176-1706

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.70.sp.iss.1.23

Keywords:

digital technologies, physical training, handball, performance monitoring, injury prevention

Abstract

Introduction: In contemporary sports, the integration of digital technologies into physical training has become increasingly relevant, particularly for youth athletes who are in sensitive stages of physical and functional development. For U18 handball players, the balance between maximizing performance and ensuring safe progression is crucial, making technology a valuable support for coaches and athletes. Objective: The purpose of this research was to analyse the effects of integrating digital monitoring tools into the physical preparation of U18 handball players. The hypothesis was that technology-assisted training would generate superior improvements compared to traditional approaches by enabling individualized workloads, objective feedback, and improved injury prevention strategies. Material and Methods: The study design included a sample of U18 handball players, divided into an experimental group trained with digital tools and a control group trained using conventional methods. Training was carried out over a full competitive cycle. Both groups were evaluated at baseline and after the intervention through standardized motor tests (strength, speed, agility, endurance, mobility) and physiological indicators such as heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and accelerometery. Tools employed included GPS trackers for movement and load assessment, video analysis for technique evaluation, and sensor-based devices to measure landing forces and postural stability. Results: The experimental group showed faster and more consistent improvements in explosive strength, acceleration, and endurance, while also maintaining higher levels of recovery quality as measured through HRV. Digital feedback promoted greater motivation and awareness among athletes, while objective monitoring allowed coaches to adjust workloads more precisely, reducing signs of overload. In contrast, the control group demonstrated progress, but with higher variability and limited individualization. Discussion: The results supported previous literature that highlighted the benefits of integrating digital monitoring tools into sports training. The added value lay in the objectivity of data collection and the capacity to design personalized programs while minimizing injury risk. Conclusions: The integration of digital technologies into the physical preparation of U18 handball players proved to be more effective than traditional approaches, supporting both performance enhancement and safe athletic development. This hybrid training model represents a methodological innovation and a practical necessity in the cultivation of future elite athletes.

References

Bangsbo, J., Iaia, F. M., & Krustrup, P. (2008). The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test: A useful tool for evaluation of physical performance in intermittent sports. Sports Medicine, 38(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838010-00004

Buchheit, M., & Simpson, B. M. (2017). Player-tracking technology: Half-full or half-empty glass? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(S2), S235–S241. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0499

Catapult (n.d.). Handbal video analysis software. Handball Video Analysis Software | Performance Data | Catapult

Gabbett, T. J. (2016). The training–injury prevention paradox: Should athletes be training smarter and harder? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788

Hopkins, W. G., Marshall, S. W., Batterham, A. M., & Hanin, J. (2009). Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278

Malone, J. J., Lovell, R., Varley, M. C., & Coutts, A. J. (2017). Unpacking the black box: Applications and considerations for using GPS devices in sport. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(S2), S218–S226. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0003

Paul, D. J., & Nassis, G. P. (2015). Physical fitness testing in youth soccer: Issues and considerations regarding reliability, validity and sensitivity. Pediatric Exercise Science, 27(3), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2014-0165

Raya-González, J., Castillo, D., Raya-González, B., Clemente, F. M., & Yanci, J. (2019). Validity of different GPS devices for measuring movement demands in team sports. Journal of Human Kinetics, 67, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0031

Twist, C., & Highton, J. (2013). Monitoring fatigue and recovery in rugby league players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 8(5), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.8.5.467

Varley, M. C., Fairweather, I. H., & Aughey, R. J. (2012). Validity and reliability of GPS for measuring instantaneous velocity during acceleration, deceleration, and constant motion. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.627941

Winter, E. M., Jones, A. M., Davison, R., Bromley, P., & Mercer, T. H. (2007). Sport and exercise physiology testing guidelines: Volume I – Sport testing. Routledge.

Ziv, G., & Lidor, R. (2009). Physical attributes, physiological characteristics, on-court performances and nutritional strategies of female and male basketball players. Sports Medicine, 39(7), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939070-00001

Póvoas, S. C., Seabra, A. F., Ascensão, A. A., Magalhães, J., Soares, J. M., & Rebelo, A. N. (2012). Physical and physiological demands of elite team handball. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26(12), 3365–3375. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182426f2a

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

POPA, R.-N., SECIU, A.-P., ENE-VOICULESCU, V., & ENE-VOICULESCU, C. (2025). INTEGRATING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN OPTIMIZING PHYSICAL TRAINING FOR U18 HANDBALL PLAYERS. Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Educatio Artis Gymnasticae, 70(Special Issue 1), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.70.sp.iss.1.23

Similar Articles

<< < 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.