COMPARISON OF REACTION SPEED IN JUNIOR ATHLETES AGED 12 TO 16 YEARS ACROSS HANDBALL, VOLLEYBALL, AND TENNIS: A FOCUS ON MANUAL ACTION DOMINANCE

Authors

  • Ștefan CIOBANU Doctoral School in Sports Science and Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Iași, Romania. *Corresponding author: stefanmciobanu16@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5983-3894
  • Marian-Petre PRĂJESCU Doctoral School in Sports Science and Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Iași, Romania, e-mail: marian.prajescu2402@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5516-5750
  • Beatrice-Aurelia ABALAȘEI Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Iași, Romania, e-mail: beatrice.abalasei@uaic.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5464-7323

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.70.sp.iss.1.07

Keywords:

Reaction speed, Manual reaction, Junior athletes, Hand-eye coordination

Abstract

Reaction speed is a critical component of athletic performance, particularly in sports requiring rapid responses to unpredictable stimuli. This study investigated manual reaction speed in junior athletes (aged 12–16) practicing volleyball, handball, and tennis. A total of 150 participants (50 per sport) completed a four-button reaction task, comprising 40 touches per trial, with two repetitions of the test per participant, each trial assessing both left and right hands. Descriptive statistics indicated that tennis players exhibited the fastest mean reaction times (Left: 486.90 ± 52.74 ms; Right: 500.20 ± 49.82 ms), compared with handball (Left: 580.68 ± 62.89 ms; Right: 614.96 ± 60.71 ms) and volleyball athletes (Left: 581.34 ± 64.20 ms; Right: 616.24 ± 58.15 ms). Normality assessments (Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests) suggested deviations from normal distribution; consequently, robust Welch ANOVA was employed. Results revealed significant differences across sports for both left-hand (F(2,93.231) = 7.978, p = 0.001) and right-hand reaction times (F(2,94.777) = 9.701, p < 0.001). Post-hoc Games–Howell analyses indicated that tennis athletes outperformed handball and volleyball players, whereas differences between handball and volleyball were negligible. Effect size measures (η² and Cohen’s d) confirmed moderate to large effects for tennis relative to other sports. These findings substantiate the proposition that tennis training enhances manual reaction speed, likely due to sport-specific demands including visuo-motor anticipation, hand-eye coordination, and rapid responses to unpredictable stimuli. The study underscores the relevance of incorporating reaction speed development in youth sports programs, particularly for disciplines necessitating swift decision-making and precise motor execution.

References

Atan, T., & Akyol, P. (2014). Reaction times of different branch athletes and correlation between reaction time parameters. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2886–2889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.674.

Badau, D., Badau, A., Joksimović, M., Manescu, C. O., Manescu, D. C., Dinciu, C. C., Margarit, I. R., Tudor, V., Mujea, A. M., Neofit, A., & Teodor, D. F. (2024). Identifying the Level of Symmetrization of Reaction Time According to Manual Lateralization between Team Sports Athletes, Individual Sports Athletes, and Non-Athletes. Symmetry, 16(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16010028

Badau, D., Baydil, B., & Badau, A. (2018). Differences among Three Measures of Reaction Time Based on Hand Laterality in Individual Sports. Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 6(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6020045

Badau, D., Stoica, A., & Badau, A. (2023). The impact of peripheral vision on manual reaction time using FitLight technology for handball, basketball, and volleyball players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(11), 6012. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060697

Buscemi, A., Mondelli, F., Biagini, I., Gueli, S., D'Agostino, A., & Coco, M. (2024). Role of Sport Vision in Performance: Systematic Review. Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 9(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9020092

Cano, L. A., Gerez, G. D., García, M. S., Albarracín, A. L., Farfán, F. D., & Fernández-Jover, E. (2024). Decision-Making Time Analysis for Assessing Processing Speed in Athletes during Motor Reaction Tasks. Sports, 12(6), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12060151

Dexheimer, B., Przybyla, A., Murphy, T. E., Akpinar, S., & Sainburg, R. (2022). Reaction time asymmetries provide insight into mechanisms underlying dominant and non-dominant hand selection. Experimental brain research, 240(10), 2791–2802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06451-2

Flôres, F. S., Lourenço, J., Phan, L., Jacobs, S., Willig, R. M., Marconcin, P. E. P., Casanova, N., Soares, D., Clemente, F. M., & Silva, A. F. (2023). Evaluation of Reaction Time during the One-Leg Balance Activity in Young Soccer Players: A Pilot Study. Children (Basel, Switzerland), 10(4), 743. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040743

Forni, F., Farinini, E., Leardi, R., & Rinaldo, A. (2022). Effects of visual training on motor performance in young tennis players using FitLight trainer. The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness, 62(4), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12145-0

Günay, Ahmet & Ceylan, Halil & Çolakoğolu, Fatma & Ozcan, Saygin & Mugla, & Halil, Ibrahim & Ceylan, Research & Assistant, (2019). Comparison of Coinciding Anticipation Timing and Reaction Time Performances of Adolescent Female Volleyball Players in Different Playing Positions.

Günay, M., Ceylan, H. İ., Çolakoğlu, T., & Saygın, Ö. (2018). Comparison of coinciding anticipation timing and reaction time performances of adolescent female volleyball players in different playing positions. The Sport Journal.

Hülsdünker, T., Ostermann, M., & Mierau, A. (2019). Standardised computer-based reaction tests predict the sport-specific visuomotor speed and performance of young elite table tennis athletes. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 19(6), 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2019.1688071

Janicijevic, D., & Garcia-Ramos, A. (2022). Feasibility of Volitional Reaction Time Tests in Athletes: A Systematic Review. Motor Control, 26(2), 291-314. Retrieved Oct 10, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1123/mc.2021-0139

Koppelaar, H., Kordestani Moghadam, P., Khan, K., Kouhkani, S., Segers, G., & Warmerdam, M. V. (2019). Reaction Time Improvements by Neural Bistability. Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 9(3), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9030028

Lochhead, L., Feng, J., Laby, D. M., & Appelbaum, L. G. (2024). Training vision in athletes to improve sports performance: a systematic review of the literature. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2024.2437385

Luo, Y., Cao, Y., Pan, X. et al. Effects of stroboscopic visual training on reaction time and movement accuracy in collegiate athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 15, 25151 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10393-4

Mancini, N., Di Padova, M., Polito, R., Mancini, S., Dipace, A., Basta, A., Colella, D., Limone, P., Messina, G., Monda, M., Monda, A., Guerriero, M. A., Messina, A., & Moscatelli, F. (2024). The Impact of Perception–Action Training Devices on Quickness and Reaction Time in Female Volleyball Players. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 9(3), 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9030147

Nuri, L., Shadmehr, A., Ghotbi, N., & Attarbashi Moghadam, B. (2012). Reaction time and anticipatory skill of athletes in open and closed skill-dominated sport. European Journal of Sport Science, 13(5), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2012.738712

Pojskic, H., Pagaduan, J., Uzicanin, E., Separovic, V., Spasic, M., Foretic, N., & Sekulic, D. (2019). Reliability, Validity and Usefulness of a New Response Time Test for Agility-Based Sports: A Simple vs. Complex Motor Task. Journal of sports science & medicine, 18(4), 623–635.

Popowczak, M., Domaradzki, J., Rokita, A., Zwierko, M., & Zwierko, T. (2020). Predicting Visual-Motor Performance in a Reactive Agility Task from Selected Demographic, Training, Anthropometric, and Functional Variables in Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5322. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155322

Popowczak, M., Domaradzki, J., Rokita, A., Zwierko, M., & Zwierko, T. (2020). Predicting Visual-Motor Performance in a Reactive Agility Task from Selected Demographic, Training, Anthropometric, and Functional Variables in Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5322. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155322

Priyanka, G., Senthil Kumar, J., & Prasha Meena, M. (2025). DHMDL: Dynamically Hashed Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Racket Video Summarization Using Audio and Visual Markers. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2025.2462382

Spieszny, M., Kamys, Z., Kasicki, K., Wąsacz, W., Ambroży, T., Jaszczur-Nowicki, J., & Rydzik, Ł. (2024). The Impact of Coordination Training on Psychomotor Abilities in Adolescent Handball Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Applied Sciences, 14(17), 7974. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177974

Wang, C., Yan, A., Deng, W., & Qi, C. (2022). Effect of Tennis Expertise on Motion-in-Depth Perception at Different Speeds: An Event-Related Potential Study. Brain sciences, 12(9), 1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091160

Wang, Y., Luo, Z., Zhang, T. et al. Sport-specific impacts of ball games on adolescent brain function: a network meta-analysis of executive cognitive tasks. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil17, 215 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01268-2

Yıldırım, N., & Kızılet, A. (2020). The effects of visual coordination training on reaction time and performance in adolescent tennis players. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 8(10), 25–31. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1280872.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

CIOBANU, Ștefan, PRĂJESCU, M.-P., & ABALAȘEI, B.-A. (2025). COMPARISON OF REACTION SPEED IN JUNIOR ATHLETES AGED 12 TO 16 YEARS ACROSS HANDBALL, VOLLEYBALL, AND TENNIS: A FOCUS ON MANUAL ACTION DOMINANCE. Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Educatio Artis Gymnasticae, 70(Special Issue 1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.70.sp.iss.1.07

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.