STUDY ON THE SOCIOLOGICAL AND MOTIVATIONAL PROFILE OF FITNESS CENTER USERS IN RESITA MUNICIPALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.70.sp.iss.1.06Keywords:
physical activity, fitness centers, training, motivation, physical exercises, social implicationsAbstract
Introduction: The insufficient level of physical activity among the population is a public health problem worldwide. According to the World Health Organization, over 27% of adults and approximately 80% of adolescents do not reach the minimum recommended levels of physical activity to maintain health. Technological development influences contemporary lifestyles, favoring inactivity. Regular physical activity is a viable alternative for maintaining optimal health, as well as for improving the quality of life. Group physical exercises are one of the more effective options for reducing stress and increasing the quality of life, compared to individual training. Fitness is an effective form of movement, helping us to be in shape both physically and mentally. Objective: To create a sociological and motivational profile of users of fitness centers in Reșița, Romania - demographic data, motivations, training preferences and social participation. Materials and methods: A 30-item cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to 87 clients of fitness centers (October 2024 - June 2025). Descriptive statistics and qualitative analyses were applied. Results: Respondents were mostly urban (90%) and male (68%), aged between 14 and 60 years and older (mostly 25-35 years). Over half had university degrees and full-time jobs. Most trained 3-5 times/week (71%) for 1-2 hours/session; For 71%, the gym was the only place where they practiced physical activity. Traditional resistance training (powerlifting/hypertrophy) predominated, with fewer choosing functional training or CrossFit. The main motivation was health and well-being (~30%), followed by relaxation (22%); 9% of respondents cited medical reasons. Discussion: Users are young - middle-aged, educated and health-oriented - consistent with the known benefits of exercise (e.g., reducing anxiety, improving self-esteem), but with gaps in diet adherence (~30%) and in proactively seeking professional guidance, despite high informational interest (78%). Personality preferences may influence choices regarding fitness modalities. Conclusions: Fitness centers in Reșița attract a socially active and health-conscious clientele; Expanding instructor-led education and inclusive offerings (e.g., beginner support, group activity formats) could broaden participation and maximize health impact, strengthening the evidence that physical exercise combined with social activities improves outcomes.
References
American Institute of Stress. (2023). 80% of employees report ‘productivity anxiety’ and lower well-being in new study. https://www.stress.org/news/80-of-employees-report-productivity-anxiety-and-lower-well-being-in-new-study/.
Bailey, R., Hillman, C., Arent, S., & Petitpas, A. (2013). Physical Activity: An Underestimated Investment in Human Capital? Journal of Physical Activity and Health,10(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.10.3.289
Bowman Z. S., Cole T. S., Dodsworth J., Fenzi D. L., & Burns S. (2014). Aerobic exercise effects on self-esteem in subjects with sedentary lifestyles. International Journal of Exercise Science: Conference Proceedings, 11(2)
Dives, G. (2024) Analysing the socioeconomic barriers to sports participation in urban areas, IJSEPE 2024; 6(1), 80 – 82, DOI: 10.33545/26647281.2024.v6.i1b.79
Featherstone M., (2010). Body, Image and Affect in Consumer Culture, Body & Society Journal, Volume 16, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X09354357
Gershon, R., Cruder, C., & Milkman, K. (2024). Friends with Health Benefits: A Field Experiment, Management Science, 71(1), 584-594. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01401
Holland, J. L.(1997). Making vocational choices: a theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Janssen, I, & Leblanc, A. G. (2010). Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 40(7), DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-40.
Michalos, M. C.(2023). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, Springer.
Moyle, P., & Hackston, J. (2018). Personality assessment for employee development: Ivory tower or real world? Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(5), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1481078
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (2018). 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.
World Health Organization (2020), WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour, Geneva: World Health Organization, http://www.who.int./publications/i/item/9789240015128
Yorks, D., Frothingham C A., & Schuenke Mark D (2017) American Osteopathic Association). Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 117(11), e17-e25, DOI: 10.7556/jaoa.2017.140.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Educatio Artis Gymnasticae

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
