Peer Review Procedure

-Review Mode: Anonymous Reviewer/Anonymous Author [This journal uses double-blind review].
-Reviewers will not be given access to the submission file until they have agreed to review it.
-Reviewers be sent a secure link in the email invitation, which will allow them to access the review without logging in. Access to other pages requires them to log in.
Number of weeks to accept or decline a review request: 2.
-Weeks allowed to complete the review: 4.

 

Please fill the online Evaluation form/or send it by email. The comments will be made available to authors. The final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of the manuscript will be made by the Subject Editor.

 

REVIEW FORM

Title
SCORES BY CRITERIA; please check as appropriate (from 1 to 5; 1 = minimum, 5 = maximum)

1. Title (the title is clear and reflects the contents of the paper)
2. Abstract and key-words (the abstract clearly summarizes the contents of the paper, and the key-words are relevant)
3. Purpose and method (the purpose is clearly stated and the proper working method is used)
4. Relevance for the specific domain (the subject is properly approached and relevant for the specific field of study)
5. Structure (the paper is properly structured, including a relevant introduction and pertinent conclusions)
6. Coherence and rigour (the subject is consistently followed and rigorously treated)
7. Style and originality (the paper presents a personal view and introduces original analysis and interpretation)
8. Literature (the literature is carefully selected, well used, rich and recent for the
chosen subject)
9. Quotations
(references are correct and unitary, following the rules of the journal)
10. Vocabulary (the vocabulary is of academic level)

Sum of the scores

GENERAL SCORE
Strong and weak points of the paper, recommendations for improvement:
Strong points:
Weak points:
Improvement recommendations:
Conclusions (please check as appropriate):
The paper may be published in the present form
The paper may be published with minor improvements
Recommend the publication only with the suggested changes
Paper rejected

Date of review: Reviewer (name, institution, signature)

The completed report can also be sent by e-mail.