REPAIR CAFÉS – APPLYING THE ACTOR-NETWORK THEORY (ANT) TO UNDERSTAND REPAIR INITIATIVES AS ELEMENTS OF SOCIAL INNOVATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2025-0009Keywords:
Repairing, circular economy, social innovation, analytical framework, technology and societyAbstract
As civil society initiatives, repair cafés make an important contribution to the circular economy and to social change. With more than 3,500 worldwide, the number of repair cafés in practice is high, but the conceptual basis for their analysis is still underdeveloped. Actor-Network Theory (ANT), which emerged in the 1980s from the sociology of science and technology, is today one of the key theories of the knowledge society. It differs from other theories in its close conceptual interweaving of human and technical elements, and its focus on relationships and constellations that make an actor act. However, ANT has so far given little attention to the topic of repair. This paper explores the potential of ANT for the analysis of repair cafés as technology-related social phenomena. With its lens on changing constellations of actors that mutually influence each other, ANT is found to be a powerful analytical approach for understanding the characteristics of specific repair initiatives, their challenges and success factors. This is relevant more broadly to the relationship between technology and society, including with view to the adoption of circular economy practices across society.
References
Aka, Kadia G (2025). Actor-network theory-based applications in sustainability: A systematic literature review. Cleaner Production Letters, 8: 100084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100084.
Akrich, Madeleine (2023). Actor Network Theory, Bruno Latour, and the CSI. Social Studies of Science, 53 (2): 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127231158102.
Belliger, Andrea and Krieger, David J. (2006). Vorwort. In A. Belliger and D. J. Krieger (eds.), ANThology. Ein einführendes Handbuch zur Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 9–11.
Bertling, Jürgen and Leggewie, Claus (2016). Die Reparaturgesellschaft. Ein Beitrag zur Großen Transformation? In A. Baier, T. Hansing, C. Müller and K. Werner (eds.), Die Welt reparieren. Open Source und Selbermachen als postkapitalistische Praxis. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 275–286.
Callon, Michel (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief. London: Routledge, pp. 196–233.
Conradi, Tobias, Derwanz, Heike and Muhle, Florian (2013). Strukturentstehung durch Verflechtung – Zur Einleitung. In T. Conradi, H. Derwanz and F. Muhle (eds.), Strukturentstehung durch Verflechtung. Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie(n) und Automatismen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 9–19.
Denis, David J. (2020). Why do maintenance and repair matter? In A. Blok, I. Farias and C. Roberts (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 283–293.
European Commission (2025). Circular economy action plan. Website, https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/circular-economy-action-plan_en (accessed 06 April 2025).
Grewe, Maria (2017). Teilen, Reparieren, Mülltauchen. Kulturelle Strategien im Umgang mit Knappheit und Überfluss. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Höhne, Stefan and Umlauf, René (2014). Die Akteur-Netzwerk Theorie. Zur Vernetzung und Entgrenzung des Sozialen, In J. Oßenbrügge and A. Vogelpohl (eds), Theorien in der Raum- und Stadtforschung. Münster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot, pp. 195–214.
Jaeger-Erben, Melanie, Meißner, Magdalena, Hielscher, Sabine and Vonnahme, Marco (2019). Herausforderung soziale Teilhabe – Repair-Cafés als Orte inklusiver nachhaltiger Entwicklung? Soziologie und Nachhaltigkeit, 5 (1): 44–65.
Kannengießer, Sigrid (2018). Repair Cafés. Orte urbaner Transformation und Vergemeinschaftung der Reparaturbewegung. In A. Hepp, S. Kubitschko and I. Marszolek (eds.), Die mediatisierte Stadt. Kommunikative Figurationen des urbanen Zusammenlebens. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 211–230.
Keiller, Scott and Charter, Martin (2018). Repair cafés. Circular and social innovation. In M. Charter (ed.), Designing for the Circular Economy. London and New York: Routledge, chapter 25.
Kneer, Georg (2013). Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. In G. Kneer and M. Schroer (eds.), Handbuch Soziologische Theorien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 19–39.
Krebs, Stefan, Schabacher, Gabriele and Weber, Heike (2018). Kulturen des Reparierens und die Lebensdauer der Dinge. In S. Krebs, G. Schabacher and H. Weber (eds.), Kulturen des Reparierens. Dinge, Wissen, Praktiken. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 9–46.
Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (1999). Pandora’s hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the Social – An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, Bruno (2006). Über technische Vermittlung: Philosophie, Soziologie und Genealogie. In A. Belliger and D. J. Krieger (eds.), ANThology. Ein einführendes Handbuch zur Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 483–528.
Law, John (2013). Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie und materiale Semiotik. In T. Conradi, H. Derwanz and F. Muhle (eds.), Strukturentstehung durch Verflechtung. Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie(n) und Automatismen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 21–48.
Lazzarin, Lorianna and Kusch, Sigrid (2025). E-waste management framework and the importance of producer responsibility and proactive hackerspaces. In Proceedings EIIC 2015 – The 4th Electronic International Interdisciplinary Conference, 10–14 Aug 2015. Slovak Republic: University of Zilina, pp. 188–192.
Lundberg, Piia, Vainio, Annukka, Viholainen, Noora and Korsunova, Angelina (2024). Consumers and self-repair: What do they repair, what skills do they have and what are they willing to learn? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 206: 107647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107647.
Luukkonen, Roosa and van den Broek, Karlijn L. (2024). Exploring the drivers behind visiting repair cafés: Insights from mental models. Cleaner Production Letters, 7: 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100070.
Madon, Julie (2021). Free repair against the consumer society: How repair cafés socialize people to a new relationship to objects. Journal of Consumer Culture, 22 (2): 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521990871.
Moalem, Rikke M. and Mosgaard, Mette A. (2021). A critical review of the role of repair cafés in a sustainable circular transition. Sustainability, 13 (22): 12351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212351.
Pesch, Udo, Spekkink, Wouter and Quist, Jaco (2019). Local sustainability initiatives: innovation and civic engagement in societal experiments. European Planning Studies, 27 (2): 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1464549.
Peuker, Birgit (2010). Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie (ANT). In C. Stegbauer and R. Häußling (eds.), Handbuch Netzwerkforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 325–335.
Philipp, Tobias (2017). Netzwerkforschung zwischen Physik und Soziologie. Perspektiven der Netzwerkforschung mit Bruno Latour und Harrison White. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Rabadjieva, Maria and Butzin, Anna (2020). Emergence and diffusion of social innovation through practice fields. European Planning Studies, 28 (5): 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1577362.
Repair Café International (2024). Repair Café – Fix your broken item. Website, https://www.repaircafe.org/en/ (accessed 06 April 2025).
Röhle, Theo (2013). Strategien ohne Strategen. Intentionalität als „Strukturentstehung durch Verflechtung“? In T. Conradi, H. Derwanz and F. Muhle (eds.), Strukturentstehung durch Verflechtung. Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie(n) und Automatismen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 173–192.
Schimank, Uwe (2000). Die unmögliche Trennung von Natur und Gesellschaft. Bruno Latours Diagnose der Selbsttäuschung der Moderne. In U. Schimank and E. Volkmann (eds.), Soziologische Gegenwartsdiagnosen I. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 157–169.
Schmidgen, Henning (2011). Bruno Latour. Zur Einführung. Third Edition. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo (2000a). Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie: zur Koevolution von Gesellschaft, Natur und Technik. In J. Weyer (ed.), Soziale Netzwerke. Konzepte und Methoden der sozialwissenschaftlichen Netzwerkforschung. Munich: Oldenbourg Verlag, pp. 187–210.
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo (2000b). Sozialtheorie der Technik. Frankfurt a. M. and New York: Campus Verlag.
Schroer, Markus (2017). Soziologische Theorien. Von den Klassikern bis zur Gegenwart. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Wieser, Matthias (2012). Das Netzwerk von Bruno Latour. Die Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie zwischen Science & Technology Studies und poststrukturalistischer Soziologie. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Sociologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
