Writing Effective Learning Outcomes: Bridging Research and Classroom Practice

Authors

  • Adina GLAVA Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babeș-BolyaiUniversity, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9818-3420
  • Dana OPRE Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babeș-BolyaiUniversity, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0534-7911
  • Adrian OPRE Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babeș-BolyaiUniversity, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Corresponding author: adrianopre@psychology.ro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4041-0659

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.FOHE.8

Keywords:

learning outcomes, competencies, deep learning, Daggett framework

Abstract

This paper examines the role of learning outcomes in the design of higher education curricula, focusing on the Romanian context and the broader European policy framework. Over the past two decades, higher education has shifted from a content-centered model toward a student-centered paradigm that emphasizes what graduates are able to demonstrate in terms of knowledge, skills, autonomy, and responsibility. Although learning outcomes were introduced within the Bologna Process to support transparency, comparability, and employability, their implementation often remains formal rather than transformative. Drawing on insights from the learning sciences, the paper highlights the importance of formulating outcomes that support deep understanding, knowledge transfer, and progression from novice to expert. It also discusses the distinction between knowledge, understanding, and skills, as well as the need to embed autonomy and responsibility within outcome statements. Finally, the study proposes the Rigour/Relevance Framework as a practical instrument for designing learning outcomes that integrate cognitive demand with authentic application contexts, thereby strengthening alignment between curriculum design, teaching, assessment, and the development of professional expertise.

References

Anderson, L. W. & D. R. Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Pearson Education Group, 2001)

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Train-the-trainers: Implementing outcomes-based teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 1-19.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn (Vol. 11). Washington, DC: National academy press.

CEDEFOP (2017) Defining, Writing and Applying Learning Outcomes: A European Handbook. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Council of the European Union (2017). Council Recommendation of 22 May 2017 on the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning and repealing the recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, C 189/15.

Creţu, D. M. (2019). Designing rigorous and relevant learning experiences for future teachers. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 290, p. 13002). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929013002

Daggett, B. (2014b). Addressing Current and Future Challenges in Education, ICLE. Retrived from https://cdnsm5-ss14.sharpschool.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_976073/File/About%20Us/strategic-planning/orientation/2-AddressingCurrentandFutureChallenges.pdf

Daggett, W. R. (2014a). Rigor/Relevance Framework®. International Center for Leadership in Education. Retrived from http://nyctecenter.org/images/files/Publications/Rigor_Relevance_Framework_2014.pdf

European Commission (2017). European Qualifications Framework (EQF). https://europass.europa.eu/en/european-qualifications-framework-eqf

Finch, D., Falkenberg, L., McLaren, P. G., Rondeau, K. V., & O’Reilly, N. (2018). The rigour–relevance gap in professional programmes: Bridging the ‘unbridgeable’between higher education and practice. Industry and Higher Education, 32(3), 152-168.

Finch, D., Falkenberg, L., McLaren, P. G., Rondeau, K. V., & O’Reilly, N. (2018). The rigour–relevance gap in professional programmes: Bridging the ‘unbridgeable’between higher education and practice. Industry and Higher Education, 32(3), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222187682

International Center for Leadership in Education (2012). Rigor and Relevance for All Students and Instructional Strategies for Each Quadrant. Retrived from: http://s3.amazonaws.com/scschoolfiles/121/rigorrelevance_activity_pack.pdf

Kennedy, D., Hyland, A. & Ryan, N. (2007) Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: A Practical Guide. Cork: University College Cork.

Purvis, Alison, and Bridget Winwood. “A guide to writing learning outcomes in higher education” (2023). https://doi.org/10.25416/NTR.23559972.v1

Schoepp, K. (2019). The state of course learning outcomes at leading universities. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 615-627.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

GLAVA, A., OPRE, D., & OPRE, A. (2026). Writing Effective Learning Outcomes: Bridging Research and Classroom Practice. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Psychologia-Paedagogia, 71(Special Issue), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbpsyped.FOHE.8

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.