DIGITAL HUMANITIES AND E-COMMERCE: CONSIDERATIONS ON DIGITAL MONOGRAPHS

Authors

  • Alessandra DI TELLA Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna. alessandra.3008@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbdigitalia.2018.1.03

Keywords:

digital monographs re-think, e-commerce, digital tools, digital-textuality layer

Abstract

“Humanities”, “Commerce” and “Monographs” are three terms that have been existed for a very long time. Nowadays, they are often conceptualized in a digital way that implies a radical paradigm shift in their main features. The aim of this article is to investigate the possibility of interaction between digital humanities and e-commerce, through their application to the genre of digital monographs. By “digital monograph” we mean born-digital, long-form, media-rich, scholarly publication, that rejects the print-based form (and so the e-book format) and takes advantage of the methods and tools of digital humanities. In particular, digital monographs re-think the traditional textuality of essays; textuality becomes “liquid” and multimodal. Because of publishing, obsolescence, discoverability, use, evaluation, etc. these products must be hosted on a publishing platform that is suitable for the scholarly needs both of the authors and of the final users. The link with e-commerce arises from the need of the publishers to sell the products of research, especially in countries where the academic publishing system is not based on University Presses but on commercial ones. This study wants to reflect on how the economic logic of profit and cultural logic can coexist in a digital publishing platform: is it possible to overcome the “monograph crisis”? What are the major problems that arise when selling an academic monograph? What business models could be the most suitable for this kind of publication? In what way can a publisher improve customer loyalty? The thesis of this article is that digital enhancement of the monograph plays a key role in its sale. The opportunities offered by the digital humanities, in fact, are not only a matter of format; they are, indeed, what makes the substantial difference in the quality of scientific communication. They enable the authors and the publishers to offer the consumer something that neither the print version, nor the e-book can do. First of all, a digital monograph allows a direct link with primary and secondary sources; secondly, it supports different layers of use and wider accessibility. Moreover, it gives both the author and the reader, the possibility to better represent and understand the complexity of the research and of the methods and tools that are used. On the other hand, this article considers the infrastructure for producing and hosting these products and its importance in the development of a cultural community based on scholarly value creation. These are some of the issues that a digital publishing project needs to consider in order to sell its products and become sustainable. After discussing these questions, this article postulates a possible functioning business model of subscription based on the concept of cultural engagement. The conclusions concern the requirement of an editorial workflow that links together all the phases of production, from the author’s composition to the reader’s purchase.

References

Anderson, Kent. “Hiding in Plain Sight – Is the Subscription Model the Optimal Business Model for the Digital Age?”, The Scholarly Kitchen, 2014, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/06/30/hiding-in-plain-sight-is-the-subscription-model-the-optimal-business-model-for-the-digital-age/.

Bollo, Alessandro. “50 Sfumature di Pubblico”, I Pubblici della Cultura. Audience Development, Audience Engagement, De Biase, Francesco (edited by), Milano, Franco Angeli, 2014.

Campbell, Robert, and Meadows, Alice. “Scholarly Journal Publishing: Where Do We Go from Here?”, Learned Publishing, 24, 2011, pp. 171–81, https://doi.org/10.1087/20110305.

Campbell, Robert, Pentz, Ed, and Borthwick, Ian (edited by). Academic and Professional Publishing, Oxford, Chandos Publishing, 2012.

Casalini, Michele. Humanities and Social Sciences Academic Content in the Era of Digital Transition, VALA Conference, february 2016.

Darnton, Robert. “The New Age of the Book”, New York Review of Book, vol.46, no. 5, 1999.

Douglas, Eyman, and Ball, Cheryl E. “Digital Humanities Scholarship and Electronic Publication”, Rhetoric and the Digital Humanities, Ridolfo, Jim, and Hart-Davidson, William (edited by), Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2015, pp. 65-79.

Finkelstein, David, and McCleery, Alistair (edited by). The Book History Reader, Oxon, Routledge, 2006.

Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy, New York, NYU Press, 2011.

Gere, Charlie. Digital Culture, London, Reaktion Books, 2009.

Greco, Albert N., Rodríguez, Clara E, and Wharton, Robert M. Culture and Commerce of Publishing in the Twenty-First Century, Palo Alto, Stanford University Press, 2006.

Gillespie, Tarleton. “The Politics of Platforms”, New Media and Society, vol. 12, no. 3, 2010, pp. 347-64.

Gordon, Linda C., Kung, David S., and Dyck, Harold. “Strategic Use of E-commerce in the Transformation of the Publishing Industry”, Communications of the IIMA, vol. 8, no. 4, 2008, pp. 65-78.

Hall, Frania. The Business of Digital Publishing. An Introduction to the Digital Book and Journal Industries, Oxon, Routledge, 2013.

Hands, Joss. “Introduction: Politics, Power and ‘Platformativity’”, Culture Machine, vol. 14, 2013, pp. 1-9.

Helmond, Anne. “The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready”, Social Media + Society, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080.

Janneke, Adema. “The Monograph Crisis Revisited”, Open Reflections, 2015,

https://openreflections.wordpress.com/2015/01/29/the-monograph-crisis-revisited/.

Lyubareva, Inna, Benghozi, Pierre-Jean, and Fidele, Teaiki. “Online Business Models in Creative Industries”, International Studies of Management & Organization, vol. 44, no. 4, 2014, pp. 43-62, http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825440403.

Magretta, Joan. “Why Business Models Matter”, Harvard Business Review, 2002, https://hbr.org/2002/05/why-business-models-matter.

Riva, Massimo. “An Emerging Scholarly Form: the Digital Monograph”, Digitcult, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 63-74, 2017,

http://dx.doi.org/10.4399/97888255099087.

Riva, Massimo. “Liquid/Cloudy/Foggy: For a Critique of Fluid Textuality”, in Humanist Studies & the Digital Age, vol. 2, no. 1, 2012,

http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/uo/hsda.2.1.3016.

Santoro, Marco. “Pubblicazioni Cartacee e Pubblicazioni Digitali: Quale Futuro per la Comunicazione Scientifica”, Memoria e Ricerca, vol. 8, 2001, http://www.sissco.it/articoli/linguaggi-e-siti-la-storia-on-line-784/pubblicazioni-cartacee-e-pubblicazioni-digitali-quale-futuro-per-la-comunicazione-scientifica-789/.

Schwartz, Andersson J. “Platform Logic: an Interdisciplinary Approach to the Platform-based Economy”, Policy and Internet, vol. 9, no. 4, 2017, pp. 374-394.

Scupola, Ada. “The Impact of Electronic Commerce on the Publishing Industry: towards a Business Value Complementarity Framework of Electronic Publishing”, Journal of Information Science, vol. 25, no. 2, 1999, pp. 133-145.

Thatcher, Stanford G. “Thinking Systematically about the Crisis in Scholarly Communication”, The Specialized Scholarly Monograph in Crisis: Or How Can I Get Tenure If You Won’t Publish My Book?, Case, Mary (edited by), Washington DC, Association of Research Libraries, 1999.

Thompson, John. Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States, Cambridge, Polity, 2005.

Watkinson, Anthony. Electronic Solutions to the problems of Monograph Publishing, The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries Research Reports, 2001, http://ciber-research.eu/download/Watkinson-Electronic_Solutions_to_the_Problems_of_Mongraph_Publishing.pdf.

Webster, James. The Marketplace of Attention: How Audiences Take Shape in a Digital Age, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2014.

Weller, Martin. The Digital Scholar, London, Bloomsbury, 2011.

Williams, Peter, Stevenson, Ian, Nicholas, David, Watkinson, Anthony, and Rowlands, Ian. “The Role and the Future of the Monograph in Arts and Humanities”, Aslib Proceedings, vol. 61, no. 1, 2009, pp. 67-82 https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910932294.

Willinsky, John. “Toward the Design of an Open Monograph Press”, Journal of Electronic Publishing, vol. 12, no. 1, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

DI TELLA, A. (2018). DIGITAL HUMANITIES AND E-COMMERCE: CONSIDERATIONS ON DIGITAL MONOGRAPHS. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Digitalia, 63(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbdigitalia.2018.1.03

Issue

Section

Articles