Revisiting Marx’s Critique of Religion in the Post-Secular Age: A Critical Philosophical Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2026.2.13Keywords:
Karl Marx, post-secularism, ideology, alienation, liberation theologyAbstract
The article revisits the critique of religion by Karl Marx in a critical philosophical perspective by both addressing the traditional understandings and current post-secular discourse. Though Marx is often characterized as having described religion as the opium of the people, this paper will point to the fact that, a more nuanced interpretation of his corpus, however, demonstrates that his dialectic is more nuanced than either the crude atheism or the political theology that he is said to have identified is able to offer. Relying on recent work by Hammer (2025), Vizcaiando (2024) and others, I would argue that the materialist critique of religion by Marx cannot be detached and disassociated with his larger social change agenda. But I also see a lot of philosophical contradictions in the stand of Marx, especially his inability to explain the existence of religious phenomena even in the post-revolutionary situations. This paper explores the need to supplement but not abandon the critique developed by Marx based on recent work by Habermas (2008), Žižek (2012), and Eagleton (2016). I suggest that religion is also ideological mystification and a reservoir of utopian wish a duality that, Marx acknowledged but not theorized. The paper concludes that a re-formed Marxist perspective on religion needs to drop any teleological notions concerning secularization and preserve the materialist emphasis on seeking to map religious consciousness into its socio-economic origins.
References
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays (B. Brewster, Trans.). Monthly Review Press.
Ambrosio, G. M. (2024). Society and alienation from Rousseau to Marx: The historical-political roots of a pathology. Orbis Idearum: European Journal of the History of Ideas, 12(1), 1-30.
Baumeister, A. (2011). The use of "public reason" by religious and secular citizens: Limitations of Habermas' conception of the role of religion in the public realm. Constellations, 18(2), 222-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2011.00635.x
Berger, P. L. (2014). The many altars of modernity: Toward a paradigm for religion in a pluralist age. De Gruyter.
Casanova, J. (2011). Public religions in the modern world. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1994)
Eagleton, T. (2016). Culture and the death of God. Yale University Press.
Feuerbach, L. (1957). The essence of Christianity (G. Eliot, Trans.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1841)
Gutierrez, G. (1988). A theology of liberation: History, politics, and salvation (C. Inda & J. Eagleson, Trans.). Orbis Books. (Original work published 1973)
Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on a post-secular society. In Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays (C. Cronin, Trans., pp. 114-147). Polity Press.
Hammer, E. (2025). A social critique of religion: Feuerbach and Marx. In After the death of God: Secularization as a philosophical challenge from Kant to Nietzsche (pp. 112-149). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226838519.003.0005
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1807)
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781)
Marx, K. (1975). Contribution to the critique of Hegel's philosophy of right. In Marx/Engels collected works (Vol. 3, pp. 175-187). International Publishers. (Original work published 1844)
Marx, K. (1975). The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Marx/Engels collected works (Vol. 11, pp. 99-197). International Publishers. (Original work published 1852)
Marx, K. (1977). Preface to a contribution to the critique of political economy. In D. McLellan (Ed.), Karl Marx: Selected writings (pp. 388-392). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1859)
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1976). The German ideology. In Marx/Engels collected works (Vol. 5, pp. 19-539). International Publishers. (Original work published 1846)
McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2020). Karl Marx and liberation theology: Dialectical materialism and Christian spirituality in, against, and beyond contemporary capitalism. In M. Pruyn, C. Malott, & L. Huerta-Charles (Eds.), Tracks to infinity, the long road to justice: The Peter McLaren reader (Vol. II, pp. 189-212). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350099982.0014
Puga-Gonzalez, I. (2025). The rise and fall of religion: An agent-based model of secularisation, security and prosociality. PLOS ONE, 20(11), e1635582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.1635582
Saunders, D. (2022). Ideology, fetishism, apophaticism: Marxist criticism and Christianity. New Blackfriars, 103(1104), 456-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbfr.12789
Sigurdson, O. (2012). Theology and Marxism in Eagleton and Žižek: A conspiracy of hope. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137103116
Thompson, G. (2022). Terry Eagleton's revolution. In The Palgrave handbook of literature and theology (pp. 101-118). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96741-3_5
Vaddiraju, A. K. (2024). Marxian critique of religion. In Reason, religion and modernity: Gadamer-Habermas debate (pp. 43-58). Springer Nature.
Vatter, M. (2020). Jürgen Habermas and public reason. In Divine democracy: Political theology after Carl Schmitt (pp. 189-240). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190942359.003.0005
Vizcaíno, R. (2024). Postsecular philosophy as metaphoric theology: On Dussel's reading of Marx. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 92(3), 510-523. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfaf001
Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press.
Žižek, S. (2012). Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. Verso.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
