VARIATIONS ON TRANSGRESSION: A BATAILLEAN READING OF “LOTUS EATERS” AND “CIRCE” IN ULYSSES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2026.3.02

Keywords:

James Joyce, Ulysses, Georges Bataille, spirituality, insect motifs, metamorphosis

Abstract

Variations on Transgression: A Bataillean Reading of “Lotus Eaters” and “Circe” in Ulysses. James Joyce’s Ulysses (1922) is a novel celebrated for its detailed exploration of the everyday, and beneath its surface lies a rich interplay of sensory experience and various forms of excess. These dimensions of the text enable us to see it as resonating with the theories of Georges Bataille, a French philosopher and intellectual who was a contemporary of Joyce. By exploring possible intersections of Joycean and Bataillean thought, this article highlights some of the ways in which Ulysses asks its readers to reconsider their certainties about modern life. The analysis reads the narrative through the lens of Bataillean theories of sovereignty, eroticism, and economy, as well as the Bataillean conception of spirituality. A thematic close reading of the subdued, interiorised quality of transgression in “Lotus Eaters” and the chaotic, proliferating excess of “Circe” reveals that Joyce’s novel not only resonates with Bataille’s critique of utility but also stages the everyday as a space where sovereignty and eroticism emerge in muted and more explicit forms, respectively, thereby challenging the very boundaries between the sacred and the profane. This approach foregrounds Joyce’s sustained interrogation of social, religious, and moral norms that structured Irish life in the early twentieth century, revealing how the everyday becomes a privileged site of resistance to inherited forms of authority and power. Finally, the events of “Circe” can be interpreted as a sacrificial rite, in which insect imagery reinforces one of the episode’s chief motifs—the metamorphosis-assisted transgression of boundaries—providing the basis for my proposal of an “entomological Batailleanism”.

Article history: Received 18 November 2025; Revised 16 December 2025; Accepted 30 March 2026; Available online 30 September 2026;
Available print 30
September 2026.

Author Biography

  • Réka TÖRZSÖK, University of Debrecen

    University of Debrecen, Hungary. Email: t.reka33@gmail.com

References

Bataille, Georges. 1962. Death and Sensuality: A Study of Eroticism and the Taboo. Translated by Mary Dalwood. New York, NY: Walker and Company.

Bataille, Georges. 1986a. “Metamorphosis.” October 36: 22–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/778542.

Bataille, Georges. 1986b. Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927–1939. Edited by Allan Stoekl. Translated by Allan Stoekl, Carl. R. Lovitt, and Donald M. Leslie, Jr. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Bataille, Georges. 1987. Story of the Eye. Translated by Joachim Neugroschel. San Francisco: City Lights Books.

Bataille, Georges. 1988. Inner Experience. Translated by Leslie Anne Boldt. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Bataille, Georges. 1989. Theory of Religion. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York, NY: Zone Books.

Bataille, Georges. 1991. The Accursed Share. 3 vols. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York, NY: Zone Books.

Bényei, Tamás. 2013. Más alakban: A metamorfózis lehetséges poétikái és politikái [In Another Form: The Possible Poetics and Politics of Metamorphosis]. Pécs: Pro Pannonia.

Blake, Elizabeth. 2015. “Obscene Hungers: Eating and Enjoying Nightwood and Ulysses.” The Comparatist 39: 153–70. www.jstor. org/stable/26254724.

Bradbury, Malcolm, and James McFarlane, eds. 1986. Modernism: 1890–1930. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Brintnall, Kent L. 2015. “Erotic Ruination: Embracing the ‘Savage Spirituality’ of Barebacking.” In Negative Ecstasies: Georges Bataille and the Study of Religion, edited by Jeremy Biles and Kent L. Brintnall, 51–67. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.

Chevalier, Jean, and Alain Gheerbrant. 1996. A Dictionary of Symbols. 2nd ed. Translated by John Buchanan-Brown. London: Penguin Books.

Crowley, Ronan. 2017. “Looking at Animals without Seeing Them: Havelock Ellis in the ‘Circe’ Episode of Ulysses.” Humanities 6, no. 3 (special issue): 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/h6030073.

Ebury, Katherine, ed. 2017. “Joyce, Animals and the Nonhuman.” Humanities 6, no. 3 (special issue). www.mdpi.com/journal/humanities/special_issues/joyce.

Ellmann, Richard. 1982. James Joyce. Rev. ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Ellmann, Maud. 2006. “Ulysses: Changing into an Animal.” Field Day Review 2: 74–93. www.jstor.org/stable/30078637.

Eysteinsson, Ástráður. 2021. “Modernism—Borders and Crises.” Humanities 10, no. 2 (special issue): 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/h10020076.

Federici, Annalisa. 2020–2021. “From Animal Anthropomorphism to Human Animality in Ulysses: Joyce After Cervantes.” James Joyce Quarterly 58, no. 1–2 (Fall–Winter): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2020.0033.

Gibson, Andrew. 1996. “Introduction.” In Joyce’s “Ithaca”, edited by Andrew Gibson, 3–27. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Gordon, John. 1994. “Approaching Reality in ‘Circe.’” Joyce Studies Annual 5: 3–21. www.jstor.org/stable/26283620.

Gula, Marianna. 2024. “Prózapoétika—James Joyce: Ulysses” [Prose Poetics—James Joyce: Ulysses]. In Az angol irodalom története 5: A viktoriánus és a modernista időszak [The History of English Literature 5: The Victorian and Modernist Periods], edited by Tamás Bényei, Angelika Reichmann, and Nóra Séllei, 581–86. Budapest: Kijárat Kiadó.

Gula, Marianna. 2015. “‘The spirit has been well caught’: The Irish Dimension of the Canonical Hungarian Translation of Ulysses (1974) and Its Remake (2012).” Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies 21, no. 1 (Spring): 123–50. www.jstor.org/stable/44790634.

Hampson, Robert. 1996. “‘Allowing for Possible Error’: Education and Catechism in ‘Ithaca.’” In Joyce’s “Ithaca”, edited by Andrew Gibson, 229–67. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Harkness, Marguerite. 1975. “‘Circe’: The Mousetrap of Ulysses.” James Joyce Quarterly 12, no. 3 (Spring): 259–72. www.jstor.org/stable/25487185.

Hengel, Daniel. 2018. “Rewriting Empire and Nationhood: The Phantasmagorical Promise of James Joyce’s Ulysses.” Nordic Irish Studies 17, no. 2: 111–32. www.jstor.org/stable/26657344.

Hung, Hsin-yu. 2008. “‘They Like It Because No-One Can Hear’: A Derridean Reading of Joyce’s Floral Language in ‘Lotus Eaters.’” James Joyce Quarterly 45, no. 2 (Winter): 348–56. www.jstor.org/stable/30244362.

Irwin, Alexander C. 1993. “Ecstasy, Sacrifice, Communication: Bataille on Religion and Inner Experience.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 76, no. 1 (Spring): 105–28. www.jstor.org/stable/41178621.

Joyce, James. 1986. Ulysses. Edited by Hans Walter Gabler, Wolfhard Steppe, and Claus Melchior. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

Ko, Tung-Wei. 2024. “A Locus of Contradiction: On Georges Bataille’s Sovereignty.” Epoché Magazine, vol. 69. https://epochemagazine.org/69/a-locus-of-contradiction-on-georges-batailles-sovereignty.

Kripal, Jeffrey J. 2015. “The Traumatic Secret: Bataille and the Comparative Erotics of Mystical Literature.” In Negative Ecstasies: Georges Bataille and the Study of Religion, edited by Jeremy Biles and Kent L. Brintnall, 153–68. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.

McFadzean, Angus. 2022–2023. “The Aesthetic of Transgression: Love and Limits in the Early Work of James Joyce.” James Joyce Quarterly 60, no. 1–2 (Fall–Winter): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2022.a906674.

Mihálycsa, Erika. 2018. “‘Weighing the point’: A Few Points on the Writing of Finitude in Ulysses.” In Reading Joycean Temporalities, edited by Jolanta Wawrzycka, 51–66. Leiden: Brill Rodopi.

Murray, Rachel. 2017. “Beelines: Joyce’s Apian Aesthetics.” Humanities 6, no. 2 (special issue): 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/h6020042.

Naseri, Shataw, and Kian Soheil. 2014. “Georges Bataille and the Transgression of Taboos by Stephan [sic] Dedalus.” International Journal of Comparative Literature & Translation Studies 2, no. 3: 50–55. https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJCLTS/article/view/432.

Nicholls, Peter. 1995. Modernisms: A Literary Guide. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Norris, Margot. 2011. Virgin and Veteran Readings of Ulysses. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Olson, Liesl. 2009. Modernism and the Ordinary. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Papandreopoulos, George. 2016. “Bataille and Nietzsche on the Limits and Ambiguities of Sovereignty and Power.” Kritike 10, no. 1 (June): 99–123.

www.kritike.org/journal/issue_18/papandreopoulos_june2016.pdf.

Rando, David. 2009. “The Cat’s Meow: Ulysses, Animals, and the Veterinary Gaze.” James Joyce Quarterly 46, no. 3–4 (Spring–Summer): 529–43. www.jstor.org/stable/20789627.

Senn, Fritz. 1994. “‘Circe’ as Harking Back in Protective Arrangement.” In Reading Joyce’s “Circe”, edited by Andrew Gibson, 63–92. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.

Senn, Fritz. 1996. “‘Ithaca’: Portrait of the Chapter as a Long List.” In Joyce’s “Ithaca”, edited by Andrew Gibson, 31–76. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.

Singleton, Mark. 2007. “Lure of the Fallen Seraphim: Sovereignty and Sacrifice in James Joyce and Georges Bataille.” James Joyce Quarterly 44, no. 2 (Winter): 303–23. www.jstor.org/stable/25571022.

Spina, Kaitlyn. 2017. Connection, Chance, and the Cosmos in Ulysses. Honors thesis, Skidmore College. https://creativematter.skidmore.edu/eng_stu_schol/21.

Zhang, Cong, and Kelin Li. 2021. “‘Circe’: Joycean-Deleuzian Chaosmos.” James Joyce Journal 27, no. 2: 85–103. www.joycesociety.or.kr/data/thesis/12003594377491.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

TÖRZSÖK, R. (2026). VARIATIONS ON TRANSGRESSION: A BATAILLEAN READING OF “LOTUS EATERS” AND “CIRCE” IN ULYSSES. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia, 71(3), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2026.3.02