TOPOGRAPHICAL PROMINENCE OF THE PEAKS FROM FĂGĂRAȘ MOUNTAINS (ROMANIA) WITH RELEVANCE TO THE MOUNTAIN ACTIVITIES. METHODOLOGICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeag.66(3).28Keywords:
mountain prominence, key-saddle, key col, line parent chain, parent-peak, mountain hierarchy, orometric dominance, mountaineering.Abstract
The peaks of the mountains have aroused the interest of people since ancient times. The route to get there, the difficulty of climbing, the view that was visible to the eyes there were challenges for everyone. And these turmoils, generated, over time, a special activity that targeted the mountain tops, mountaineering. From the moment Mont Blanc was conquered (Balmat, Paccard, 1786), then Everest (Hillary, Tenzing, 1953), mountain lovers are constantly looking to reach the peaks, to get drunk with ephemeral success, and become conquerors of useless (Terray, 1961). But the peaks, in addition to being bastions that need to be attacked, are also distinguished by geomorphometric approaches, and one of these approaches is the prominence, a parameter that represents the level difference by which a peak jumps over its base from the surrounding regions. Therefore, the higher this jump, the more important the tip is for mountaineers, and the more it should be included in the list. In this context, this paper aims to analyze and establish the prominence of the peaks of the most coveted mountain massif in the Romanian Carpathians, namely Făgăraș Mountains, highlighting a practical side of the problem, materialized by the methodological approach included in the research.
REZUMAT. Proeminența topografică a vârfurilor din Munții Făgărașului (România), cu relevanță pentru activitățile agrementale montane. Aspecte practice și metodologice. Vârfurile munților au stârnit interesul oamenilor din cele mai vechi timpuri. Drumul până acolo, dificultatea de a urca, priveliștea care se dezvăluia ochilor de acolo, erau provocări pentru oricine. Și aceste frământări, au generat, peste timp, o activitate aparte care viza vârfurile munților, muntenăria. Din momentul în care a fost cucerit Mont Blancul (Balmat, Paccard, 1786), apoi Everestul (Hillary, Tenzing, 1953), iubitorii muntelui își doresc neîncetat să ajungă pe vârfuri, pentru a se îmbăta cu un succes efemer și a deveni cuceritori ai inutilului (Lionel Terray, 1961). Dar vârfurile, pe lângă faptul că sunt bastioane care trebuie asaltate, se disting și prin abordări geomorfometrice, iar una dintre aceste abordări este proeminența, parametru care reprezintă diferența de nivel prin care un vârf saltă peste baza sa față de regiunile înconjurătoare. Prin urmare, cu cât acest salt este mai mare, cu atât vârful este mai important pentru muntenari și cu atât mai mult trebuie inclus în palmares. În acest context, lucrarea de față își propune să analizeze și să stabilească proeminența vârfurilor din cel mai râvnit masiv montan din Carpații Românești, respectiv Munții Făgărașului, scoțând în evidență și o latură practică a problemei, materializată prin demersul metodologic inclus în cercetare.
Cuvinte-cheie: proeminență montană, înșeuare-cheie, dominanță orometrică, turism montan.
References
Bîca, I., (2019). The prominence of the peaks from Rodnei Mountains with relevance for mountaineering. Studia UBB Educatio Artis Gymn, 64 (3), DOI: 10.24193/subbeag 64(3).25, pp.89-104.
Dawson, A., (1992). The Relative Hills of Britain. Cicerone Press. Retrieved 15 September 2020 from https://www.rhb.org.uk/marilyns/rhb199200.htm.
Dawson, A, (1997a), The Hewitts and Marilyns of Wales. TACit Press, Retrieved 15 September 2020 from https://www.rhb.org.uk/tables/hewittsengland1997.htm.
Dawson, A., (1997b). The Hewitts and Marilyns of England. TACit Press, Retrieved on 15 September 2020 from https://www.rhb.org.uk/tables/hewittsengland1997.htm.
Dewey, M., (1995). Mountain Tables: Tables of the mountain and hill summits of England and Wales, Constable.
Goedeke, R., (1991). The Alpine 4000 m Peaks by the Classic Routes. Baton Wicks Publication.
Goedeke, R., (2006). Giganten der Alpen: Die 20 prominentesten Berge der Alpen, Bruckmann Verlag.
Grimm, P, Mattmüller, C.R., (2004). Die Gebirgsgruppen der Alpen. Wissenschaftliche Alpenvereinshefte, Heft 39, Deutscher Alpenverein.
Helman, A., (2005). The Finest Peaks. Prominence and other Mountain Measures. Trafford Holdings Ltd., Retrieved 10 October 2020 from: https://books.google.ro/books.
Höhne, E., (1993). 1000 Gipfel der Alpen. Wanderziele und Paradeberge.Weltbild Verlag.
Jackson, M., (2009). More relative hills of Britain, Marilyn News Center. [PDF Book], Retrieved 10 October 2020 from: http://www.rhb.org.uk/humps/humps_1_1_0c.pdf.
Bearhop, D.A.,ed. (1997). Munro's Tables (Scottish Mountaineering Club District Guides). Scottish Mountaineering Club.
Nuttall, J., Nuttall, A., (1989, 1990, 2008, 2009). The Mountains of England and Wales. Cicerone.
Schmidt, A., Stumme, G., (2018). Prominence and dominance in Networks. 21st International Conference, EKAW, Nancy, France, Verlag: Springer International Publishing.
Stubbemann, M., Hanika, T., Stumme, G., (2019). Orometric Methods in Bounded Metric Data. [PDF document], Retrieved 20 October 2020 from arxiv.org.
Terray, L., (1961). Les Conquerants de l`inutile. Gallimard.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Educatio Artis Gymnasticae
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.